userns,pidns: Verify the userns for new pid namespaces
It is pointless and confusing to allow a pid namespace hierarchy and the user namespace hierarchy to get out of sync. The owner of a child pid namespace should be the owner of the parent pid namespace or a descendant of the owner of the parent pid namespace. Otherwise it is possible to construct scenarios where a process has a capability over a parent pid namespace but does not have the capability over a child pid namespace. Which confusingly makes permission checks non-transitive. It requires use of setns into a pid namespace (but not into a user namespace) to create such a scenario. Add the function in_userns to help in making this determination. v2: Optimized in_userns by using level as suggested by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Ref: 49f4d8b9 ("pidns: Capture the user namespace and filter ns_last_pid") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment