Commit a89fcca8 authored by Guilherme G. Piccoli's avatar Guilherme G. Piccoli Committed by Jens Axboe

nvme: Fix cntlid validation when not using NVMEoF

Commit 1b1031ca ("nvme: validate cntlid during controller initialisation")
introduced a validation for controllers with duplicate cntlid that runs
on nvme_init_subsystem(). The problem is that the validation relies on
ctrl->cntlid, and this value is assigned (from id_ctrl value) after the
call for nvme_init_subsystem() in nvme_init_identify() for non-fabrics
scenario. That leads to ctrl->cntlid always being 0 in case we have a
physical set of controllers in the same subsystem.

This patch fixes that by loading the discovered cntlid id_ctrl value into
ctrl->cntlid before the subsystem initialization, only for the non-fabrics
case. The patch was tested with emulated nvme devices (qemu) having two
controllers in a single subsystem. Without the patch, we couldn't make
it work failing in the duplicate check; when running with the patch, we
could see the subsystem holding both controllers.

For the fabrics case we see ctrl->cntlid has a more intricate relation
with the admin connect, so we didn't change that.

Fixes: 1b1031ca ("nvme: validate cntlid during controller initialisation")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 504db087
......@@ -2597,6 +2597,9 @@ int nvme_init_identify(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
goto out_free;
}
if (!(ctrl->ops->flags & NVME_F_FABRICS))
ctrl->cntlid = le16_to_cpu(id->cntlid);
if (!ctrl->identified) {
int i;
......@@ -2697,7 +2700,6 @@ int nvme_init_identify(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
goto out_free;
}
} else {
ctrl->cntlid = le16_to_cpu(id->cntlid);
ctrl->hmpre = le32_to_cpu(id->hmpre);
ctrl->hmmin = le32_to_cpu(id->hmmin);
ctrl->hmminds = le32_to_cpu(id->hmminds);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment