Commit b339088d authored by Ville Syrjälä's avatar Ville Syrjälä Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Don't write IVB_FBC_RT_BASE

We use nuking instead of render tracking on IVB+, so there's
no point in writing IVB_FBC_RT_BASE.

v2: Drop the IVB_FBC_RT_BASE write too
v3: Move the SNB stuff elsewhere, leaving only IVB+ here
Signed-off-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 0e5539b9
......@@ -283,8 +283,6 @@ static void gen7_enable_fbc(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = intel_fb->obj;
struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);
I915_WRITE(IVB_FBC_RT_BASE, i915_gem_obj_ggtt_offset(obj));
I915_WRITE(ILK_DPFC_CONTROL, DPFC_CTL_EN | DPFC_CTL_LIMIT_1X |
IVB_DPFC_CTL_FENCE_EN |
intel_crtc->plane << IVB_DPFC_CTL_PLANE_SHIFT);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment