Commit b7158553 authored by Alan Cox's avatar Alan Cox Committed by Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] more typo fixes

(Steven Cole)
parent cffba320
...@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ DEBUG(printk(KERN_DEBUG " %d: clip(%d,%d,%d,%d)\n", i,vp->x,vp->y,vp->widt ...@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ DEBUG(printk(KERN_DEBUG " %d: clip(%d,%d,%d,%d)\n", i,vp->x,vp->y,vp->widt
vcp->width < 0 || (uint)(vcp->x+vcp->width) > ztv->overinfo.w || vcp->width < 0 || (uint)(vcp->x+vcp->width) > ztv->overinfo.w ||
vcp->height < 0 || (vcp->y+vcp->height) > ztv->overinfo.h) vcp->height < 0 || (vcp->y+vcp->height) > ztv->overinfo.h)
{ {
DEBUG(printk(CARD_DEBUG "illegal clipzone (%d,%d,%d,%d) not in (0,0,%d,%d), adapting\n",CARD,vcp->x,vcp->y,vcp->width,vcp->height,ztv->overinfo.w,ztv->overinfo.h)); DEBUG(printk(CARD_DEBUG "invalid clipzone (%d,%d,%d,%d) not in (0,0,%d,%d), adapting\n",CARD,vcp->x,vcp->y,vcp->width,vcp->height,ztv->overinfo.w,ztv->overinfo.h));
if (vcp->x < 0) vcp->x = 0; if (vcp->x < 0) vcp->x = 0;
if ((uint)vcp->x > ztv->overinfo.w) vcp->x = ztv->overinfo.w; if ((uint)vcp->x > ztv->overinfo.w) vcp->x = ztv->overinfo.w;
if (vcp->y < 0) vcp->y = 0; if (vcp->y < 0) vcp->y = 0;
......
...@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ The flash is accessed as follows: ...@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ The flash is accessed as follows:
16 bit I/O port (0x22) for some sort of paging. 16 bit I/O port (0x22) for some sort of paging.
The single flash device is divided into 3 partition which appear as seperate The single flash device is divided into 3 partition which appear as separate
MTD devices. MTD devices.
Linux thinks that the I/O port is used by the PIC and hence check_region() will Linux thinks that the I/O port is used by the PIC and hence check_region() will
......
...@@ -31,17 +31,17 @@ ...@@ -31,17 +31,17 @@
* *
* The actual BIOS layout has been mostly reverse engineered. Intel BIOS * The actual BIOS layout has been mostly reverse engineered. Intel BIOS
* updates for this board include 10 related (*.bio - &.bi9) binary files and * updates for this board include 10 related (*.bio - &.bi9) binary files and
* another seperate (*.bbo) binary file. The 10 files are 64k of data + a * another separate (*.bbo) binary file. The 10 files are 64k of data + a
* small header. If the headers are stripped off, the 10 64k files can be * small header. If the headers are stripped off, the 10 64k files can be
* concatenated into a 640k image. This is your BIOS image, proper. The * concatenated into a 640k image. This is your BIOS image, proper. The
* seperate .bbo file also has a small header. It is the 'Boot Block' * separate .bbo file also has a small header. It is the 'Boot Block'
* recovery BIOS. Once the header is stripped, no further prep is needed. * recovery BIOS. Once the header is stripped, no further prep is needed.
* As best I can tell, the BIOS is arranged as such: * As best I can tell, the BIOS is arranged as such:
* offset 0x00000 to 0x4ffff (320k): unknown - SCSI BIOS, etc? * offset 0x00000 to 0x4ffff (320k): unknown - SCSI BIOS, etc?
* offset 0x50000 to 0xeffff (640k): BIOS proper * offset 0x50000 to 0xeffff (640k): BIOS proper
* offset 0xf0000 ty 0xfffff (64k): Boot Block region * offset 0xf0000 ty 0xfffff (64k): Boot Block region
* *
* Intel's BIOS update program flashes the BIOS and Boot Block in seperate * Intel's BIOS update program flashes the BIOS and Boot Block in separate
* steps. Probably a wise thing to do. * steps. Probably a wise thing to do.
*/ */
......
...@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int __init eepro_probe1(struct net_device *dev, short ioaddr) ...@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int __init eepro_probe1(struct net_device *dev, short ioaddr)
} }
} }
if (dev->irq < 2) { if (dev->irq < 2) {
printk(KERN_ERR " Duh! illegal interrupt vector stored in EEPROM.\n"); printk(KERN_ERR " Duh! invalid interrupt vector stored in EEPROM.\n");
retval = -ENODEV; retval = -ENODEV;
goto freeall; goto freeall;
} else } else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment