Commit bf4237a1 authored by Heiko Stuebner's avatar Heiko Stuebner Committed by Heiko Stuebner

clk: rockchip: convert rk3399 pll type to use readl_relaxed_poll_timeout

Instead of open coding the polling of the lock status, use the handy
readl_relaxed_poll_timeout for this. As the pll locking is normally
blazingly fast and we don't want to incur additional delays, we're
not doing any sleeps similar to for example the imx clk-pllv4
and define a very safe but still short timeout of 1ms.
Suggested-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200129163821.1547295-1-heiko@sntech.de
parent b3a9e3b9
......@@ -589,19 +589,20 @@ static const struct clk_ops rockchip_rk3066_pll_clk_ops = {
static int rockchip_rk3399_pll_wait_lock(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll)
{
u32 pllcon;
int delay = 24000000;
int ret;
/* poll check the lock status in rk3399 xPLLCON2 */
while (delay > 0) {
pllcon = readl_relaxed(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2));
if (pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS)
return 0;
/*
* Lock time typical 250, max 500 input clock cycles @24MHz
* So define a very safe maximum of 1000us, meaning 24000 cycles.
*/
ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(pll->reg_base + RK3399_PLLCON(2),
pllcon,
pllcon & RK3399_PLLCON2_LOCK_STATUS,
0, 1000);
if (ret)
pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
delay--;
}
pr_err("%s: timeout waiting for pll to lock\n", __func__);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
return ret;
}
static void rockchip_rk3399_pll_get_params(struct rockchip_clk_pll *pll,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment