Commit bfba223d authored by Justin Chen's avatar Justin Chen Committed by Linus Walleij

gpio: brcmstb: allow 0 width GPIO banks

Sometimes we have empty banks within the GPIO block. This commit allows
proper handling of 0 width GPIO banks. We handle 0 width GPIO banks by
incrementing the bank and number of GPIOs, but not initializing them.
This will mean a call into the non-existent GPIOs will return an error.

Also remove "GPIO registered" dev print. This information is misleading
since the incremented banks and gpio_base do not reflect the actual GPIOs
that get initialized. We leave this information out since it is already
printed with dev_dbg.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJustin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent 36f3f19a
......@@ -664,6 +664,18 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
/*
* If bank_width is 0, then there is an empty bank in the
* register block. Special handling for this case.
*/
if (bank_width == 0) {
dev_dbg(dev, "Width 0 found: Empty bank @ %d\n",
num_banks);
num_banks++;
gpio_base += MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
continue;
}
bank = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bank), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bank) {
err = -ENOMEM;
......@@ -740,9 +752,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto fail;
}
dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n",
num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1);
if (priv->parent_wake_irq && need_wakeup_event)
pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment