Commit bfbacc11 authored by João Paulo Rechi Vita's avatar João Paulo Rechi Vita Committed by Marcel Holtmann

Bluetooth: Fix SREJ_QUEUE corruption in L2CAP

Since all TxSeq values are modulo, we shall not compare them directly. We
have to compare their offset inside the TxWindow instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoão Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@profusion.mobi>
Acked-by: default avatarGustavo F. Padovan <padovan@profusion.mobi>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
parent 6e2b6722
......@@ -3394,6 +3394,8 @@ static inline void l2cap_send_i_or_rr_or_rnr(struct sock *sk)
static int l2cap_add_to_srej_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 tx_seq, u8 sar)
{
struct sk_buff *next_skb;
struct l2cap_pinfo *pi = l2cap_pi(sk);
int tx_seq_offset, next_tx_seq_offset;
bt_cb(skb)->tx_seq = tx_seq;
bt_cb(skb)->sar = sar;
......@@ -3404,11 +3406,20 @@ static int l2cap_add_to_srej_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 tx_s
return 0;
}
tx_seq_offset = (tx_seq - pi->buffer_seq) % 64;
if (tx_seq_offset < 0)
tx_seq_offset += 64;
do {
if (bt_cb(next_skb)->tx_seq == tx_seq)
return -EINVAL;
if (bt_cb(next_skb)->tx_seq > tx_seq) {
next_tx_seq_offset = (bt_cb(next_skb)->tx_seq -
pi->buffer_seq) % 64;
if (next_tx_seq_offset < 0)
next_tx_seq_offset += 64;
if (next_tx_seq_offset > tx_seq_offset) {
__skb_queue_before(SREJ_QUEUE(sk), next_skb, skb);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment