Commit c16c4ba7 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson

drm/i915: Move irqs enabled assertion deeper for mock breadcrumbs

In order to allow the mock breadcrumbs tests to run without device irqs
being enabled, move the intel_irqs_enabled() assert deeper to just
before we commit to enabling the HW irq.

v2: Add a FIXME explaining that placing the assertion so deep is not
ideal, but a compromise for mock breadcrumbs.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171107102003.1802-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: default avatarJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
parent b1a1e5d2
......@@ -145,6 +145,14 @@ static void intel_breadcrumbs_fake_irq(struct timer_list *t)
static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
/*
* FIXME: Ideally we want this on the API boundary, but for the
* sake of testing with mock breadcrumbs (no HW so unable to
* enable irqs) we place it deep within the bowels, at the point
* of no return.
*/
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(engine->i915));
/* Enabling the IRQ may miss the generation of the interrupt, but
* we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
* just in case.
......@@ -266,8 +274,6 @@ static bool __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = engine->i915;
bool enabled;
GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_irqs_enabled(i915));
lockdep_assert_held(&b->irq_lock);
if (b->irq_armed)
return false;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment