drm/i915: Set our shrinker->batch to 4096 (~16MiB)
Prefer to defer activating our GEM shrinker until we have a few megabytes to free; or we have accumulated sufficient mempressure by deferring the reclaim to force a shrink. The intent is that because our objects may typically be large, we are too effective at shrinking and are not rewarded for freeing more pages than the batch. It will also defer the initial shrinking to hopefully put it at a lower priority than say the buffer cache (although it will balance out over a number of reclaims, with GEM being more bursty). v2: Give it a feedback system to try and tune the batch size towards an effective size for the available objects. v3: Start keeping track of shrinker stats in debugfs v4: Protect against finding no shrinkable objects (div-by-zero) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171013202621.7276-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment