Commit c7784b1c authored by Maor Gottlieb's avatar Maor Gottlieb Committed by Saeed Mahameed

net/mlx5: Replace fs_node mutex with reader/writer semaphore

Currently, steering object is protected by mutex lock, replace
the mutex lock with reader/writer semaphore .
In this patch we still use only write semaphore. In downstream
patches we will switch part of the write locks to read locks.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaor Gottlieb <maorg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSaeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
parent 19f100fe
......@@ -145,10 +145,10 @@ static struct init_tree_node {
}
};
enum fs_i_mutex_lock_class {
FS_MUTEX_GRANDPARENT,
FS_MUTEX_PARENT,
FS_MUTEX_CHILD
enum fs_i_lock_class {
FS_LOCK_GRANDPARENT,
FS_LOCK_PARENT,
FS_LOCK_CHILD
};
static const struct rhashtable_params rhash_fte = {
......@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void tree_init_node(struct fs_node *node,
atomic_set(&node->refcount, 1);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&node->children);
mutex_init(&node->lock);
init_rwsem(&node->lock);
node->remove_func = remove_func;
node->active = false;
}
......@@ -208,10 +208,10 @@ static void tree_get_node(struct fs_node *node)
}
static void nested_lock_ref_node(struct fs_node *node,
enum fs_i_mutex_lock_class class)
enum fs_i_lock_class class)
{
if (node) {
mutex_lock_nested(&node->lock, class);
down_write_nested(&node->lock, class);
atomic_inc(&node->refcount);
}
}
......@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static void nested_lock_ref_node(struct fs_node *node,
static void lock_ref_node(struct fs_node *node)
{
if (node) {
mutex_lock(&node->lock);
down_write(&node->lock);
atomic_inc(&node->refcount);
}
}
......@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void unlock_ref_node(struct fs_node *node)
{
if (node) {
atomic_dec(&node->refcount);
mutex_unlock(&node->lock);
up_write(&node->lock);
}
}
......@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ static struct mlx5_flow_handle *add_rule_fg(struct mlx5_flow_group *fg,
int old_action;
int ret;
nested_lock_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_MUTEX_CHILD);
nested_lock_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_LOCK_CHILD);
ret = check_conflicting_ftes(fte, flow_act);
if (ret) {
handle = ERR_PTR(ret);
......@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ static struct mlx5_flow_handle *add_rule_fg(struct mlx5_flow_group *fg,
fte = alloc_insert_fte(fg, match_value, flow_act);
if (IS_ERR(fte))
return (void *)fte;
nested_lock_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_MUTEX_CHILD);
nested_lock_ref_node(&fte->node, FS_LOCK_CHILD);
handle = add_rule_fte(fte, fg, dest, dest_num, false);
if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
unlock_ref_node(&fte->node);
......@@ -1548,7 +1548,7 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
struct fs_fte *fte;
g = iter->g;
nested_lock_ref_node(&g->node, FS_MUTEX_PARENT);
nested_lock_ref_node(&g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
fte = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&g->ftes_hash, spec->match_value,
rhash_fte);
if (fte) {
......@@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ try_add_to_existing_fg(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
list_for_each_entry(iter, &match_head.list, list) {
g = iter->g;
nested_lock_ref_node(&g->node, FS_MUTEX_PARENT);
nested_lock_ref_node(&g->node, FS_LOCK_PARENT);
rule = add_rule_fg(g, spec->match_value,
flow_act, dest, dest_num, NULL);
if (!IS_ERR(rule) || PTR_ERR(rule) != -ENOSPC) {
......@@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ _mlx5_add_flow_rules(struct mlx5_flow_table *ft,
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
nested_lock_ref_node(&ft->node, FS_MUTEX_GRANDPARENT);
nested_lock_ref_node(&ft->node, FS_LOCK_GRANDPARENT);
rule = try_add_to_existing_fg(ft, spec, flow_act, dest, dest_num);
if (!IS_ERR(rule) || PTR_ERR(rule) != -ENOENT)
goto unlock;
......
......@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ struct fs_node {
struct fs_node *parent;
struct fs_node *root;
/* lock the node for writing and traversing */
struct mutex lock;
struct rw_semaphore lock;
atomic_t refcount;
bool active;
void (*remove_func)(struct fs_node *);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment