Commit c8d317aa authored by Hao Xu's avatar Hao Xu Committed by Jens Axboe

io_uring: fix async buffered reads when readahead is disabled

The async buffered reads feature is not working when readahead is
turned off. There are two things to concern:

- when doing retry in io_read, not only the IOCB_WAITQ flag but also
  the IOCB_NOWAIT flag is still set, which makes it goes to would_block
  phase in generic_file_buffered_read() and then return -EAGAIN. After
  that, the io-wq thread work is queued, and later doing the async
  reads in the old way.

- even if we remove IOCB_NOWAIT when doing retry, the feature is still
  not running properly, since in generic_file_buffered_read() it goes to
  lock_page_killable() after calling mapping->a_ops->readpage() to do
  IO, and thus causing process to sleep.

Fixes: 1a0a7853 ("mm: support async buffered reads in generic_file_buffered_read()")
Fixes: 3b2a4439 ("io_uring: get rid of kiocb_wait_page_queue_init()")
Signed-off-by: default avatarHao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent fad8e0de
......@@ -3049,6 +3049,7 @@ static int io_async_buf_func(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode,
if (!wake_page_match(wpq, key))
return 0;
req->rw.kiocb.ki_flags &= ~IOCB_WAITQ;
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
init_task_work(&req->task_work, io_req_task_submit);
......@@ -3106,6 +3107,7 @@ static bool io_rw_should_retry(struct io_kiocb *req)
wait->wait.flags = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wait->wait.entry);
kiocb->ki_flags |= IOCB_WAITQ;
kiocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_NOWAIT;
kiocb->ki_waitq = wait;
io_get_req_task(req);
......
......@@ -2267,7 +2267,11 @@ ssize_t generic_file_buffered_read(struct kiocb *iocb,
}
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
error = lock_page_killable(page);
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_WAITQ)
error = lock_page_async(page, iocb->ki_waitq);
else
error = lock_page_killable(page);
if (unlikely(error))
goto readpage_error;
if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment