Commit d248953a authored by Martin Habets's avatar Martin Habets Committed by David S. Miller

sfc: Take mac_lock before calling efx_ef10_filter_table_probe

When trying to enslave an SFC interface to a bond the following BUG_ON was
hit:

 kernel BUG [in ef10.c]!
 CPU: 0 PID: 4383 Comm: ifenslave Tainted: G
...
 Call Trace:
  efx_ef10_filter_add_vlan+0x121/0x180 [sfc]
  efx_ef10_filter_table_probe+0x2a2/0x4f0 [sfc]
  efx_ef10_set_mac_address+0x370/0x6d0 [sfc]
  efx_set_mac_address+0x7d/0x120 [sfc]
  dev_set_mac_address+0x43/0xa0
  bond_enslave+0x337/0xea0 [bonding]
This comes from function efx_ef10_filter_vlan_sync_rx_mode.

To solve the bug we ensure the mac_lock is taken before calling
efx_ef10_filter_add_vlan. But to avoid a priority inversion mac_lock must
be taken before filter_sem.
To satisfy these requirements we end up taking mac_lock in
efx_ef10_vport_set_mac_address, efx_ef10_set_mac_address,
efx_ef10_sriov_set_vf_vlan and efx_probe_filters.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4a53ea8a
......@@ -4666,6 +4666,8 @@ static int efx_ef10_set_mac_address(struct efx_nic *efx)
efx_device_detach_sync(efx);
efx_net_stop(efx->net_dev);
mutex_lock(&efx->mac_lock);
down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
efx_ef10_filter_table_remove(efx);
......@@ -4678,6 +4680,8 @@ static int efx_ef10_set_mac_address(struct efx_nic *efx)
efx_ef10_filter_table_probe(efx);
up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
mutex_unlock(&efx->mac_lock);
if (was_enabled)
efx_net_open(efx->net_dev);
netif_device_attach(efx->net_dev);
......
......@@ -554,6 +554,7 @@ int efx_ef10_sriov_set_vf_vlan(struct efx_nic *efx, int vf_i, u16 vlan,
efx_device_detach_sync(vf->efx);
efx_net_stop(vf->efx->net_dev);
mutex_lock(&vf->efx->mac_lock);
down_write(&vf->efx->filter_sem);
vf->efx->type->filter_table_remove(vf->efx);
......@@ -630,6 +631,7 @@ int efx_ef10_sriov_set_vf_vlan(struct efx_nic *efx, int vf_i, u16 vlan,
goto reset_nic_up_write;
up_write(&vf->efx->filter_sem);
mutex_unlock(&vf->efx->mac_lock);
up_write(&vf->efx->filter_sem);
......@@ -642,9 +644,10 @@ int efx_ef10_sriov_set_vf_vlan(struct efx_nic *efx, int vf_i, u16 vlan,
return rc;
reset_nic_up_write:
if (vf->efx)
if (vf->efx) {
up_write(&vf->efx->filter_sem);
mutex_unlock(&vf->efx->mac_lock);
}
reset_nic:
if (vf->efx) {
netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
......
......@@ -1729,6 +1729,7 @@ static int efx_probe_filters(struct efx_nic *efx)
spin_lock_init(&efx->filter_lock);
init_rwsem(&efx->filter_sem);
mutex_lock(&efx->mac_lock);
down_write(&efx->filter_sem);
rc = efx->type->filter_table_probe(efx);
if (rc)
......@@ -1767,6 +1768,7 @@ static int efx_probe_filters(struct efx_nic *efx)
#endif
out_unlock:
up_write(&efx->filter_sem);
mutex_unlock(&efx->mac_lock);
return rc;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment