Commit d6ff44d6 authored by Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar Rafael J. Wysocki

cpufreq: governor: CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS never fails

None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail
an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument
equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS (unless invoked with incorrect arguments
which doesn't matter anyway) and had it ever failed, the result of
it wouldn't have been very clean.

For this reason, rearrange the code in the core to ignore the return
value of cpufreq_governor() when called with event equal to
CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
parent 1a695a90
......@@ -2054,7 +2054,11 @@ static int cpufreq_start_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
cpufreq_update_current_freq(policy);
ret = cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
return ret ? ret : cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
if (ret)
return ret;
cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
return 0;
}
int cpufreq_register_governor(struct cpufreq_governor *governor)
......@@ -2195,7 +2199,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if (new_policy->governor == policy->governor) {
pr_debug("cpufreq: governor limits update\n");
return cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
return 0;
}
pr_debug("governor switch\n");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment