PCMCIA / PM: Avoid noirq suspend aborts during suspend-to-idle
There is a problem with PCMCIA system resume callbacks with respect to suspend-to-idle in which the ->suspend_noirq() callback may be invoked after the ->resume_noirq() one without resuming the system entirely in some cases. This doesn't work for PCMCIA because of the lack of symmetry between its system suspend and system resume "noirq" callbacks. The system resume handling in PCMCIA is split between socket_early_resume() and socket_late_resume() which are called in different phases of system resume and both need to run for socket_suspend() (invoked by the system suspend "noirq" callback) to work. Specifically, socket_suspend() returns an error when called after socket_early_resume() without socket_late_resume(), so if the suspend-to-idle core detects a spurious wakeup event and attempts to put the system back to sleep, that is aborted by the error coming from socket_suspend(). Avoid that by using a new socket state flag, SOCKET_IN_RESUME, to indicate that socket_early_resume() has already run for the socket in which case socket_suspend() will do minimum handling and return 0. This change has been tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500 (which is where the problem has been discovered in the first place), but admittedly I have no PCMCIA cards to test along with the socket itself. Fixes: 33e4f80e (ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> [linux@dominikbrodowski.net: follow same codepaths for both suspend variants; call ->suspend()] Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment