Commit e488ca9f authored by Brian Norris's avatar Brian Norris

doc: dt: mtd: partitions: add compatible property to "partitions" node

As noted here [1], there are potentially future conflicts if we try to
use MTD's "partitions" subnode to describe anything besides just the
fixed-in-the-device-tree partitions currently described in this
document. Particularly, there was a proposal to use this node for the
AFS parser too.

It can pose a (small) problem to try to differentiate the following
nodes:

	// using binding as currently specified
	partitions {
		#address-cells = <x>;
		#size-cells = <y>;
		partition@0 {
			...;
		};
	};

and

	// proposed future binding
	partitions {
		compatible = "arm,arm-flash-structure";
	};

It's especially difficult if other uses of this node start having
subnodes.

So, since the "partitions" node is new in v4.4, let's fixup the binding
before release so that it requires a compatible property, so it's much
clearer to distinguish. e.g.:

	// proposed
	partitions {
		compatible = "fixed-partitions";
		#address-cells = <x>;
		#size-cells = <y>;
		partition@0 {
			...;
		};
	};

[1] Subject: "mtd: create a partition type device tree binding"
    http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20151113220039.GA74382@google.com
    http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063355.html
    http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-November/063364.html

Cc: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
parent 8c62b4e1
......@@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ used for what purposes, but which don't use an on-flash partition table such
as RedBoot.
The partition table should be a subnode of the mtd node and should be named
'partitions'. Partitions are defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
'partitions'. This node should have the following property:
- compatible : (required) must be "fixed-partitions"
Partitions are then defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
For backwards compatibility partitions as direct subnodes of the mtd device are
supported. This use is discouraged.
......@@ -36,6 +38,7 @@ Examples:
flash@0 {
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
......@@ -53,6 +56,7 @@ flash@0 {
flash@1 {
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <2>;
......@@ -66,6 +70,7 @@ flash@1 {
flash@2 {
partitions {
compatible = "fixed-partitions";
#address-cells = <2>;
#size-cells = <2>;
......
......@@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ static int parse_ofpart_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
master->name, mtd_node->full_name);
ofpart_node = mtd_node;
dedicated = false;
} else if (!of_device_is_compatible(ofpart_node, "fixed-partitions")) {
/* The 'partitions' subnode might be used by another parser */
return 0;
}
/* First count the subnodes */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment