Commit e5bc3af7 authored by Paul E. McKenney's avatar Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Consolidate PREEMPT and !PREEMPT synchronize_rcu()

Now that rcu_blocking_is_gp() makes the correct immediate-return
decision for both PREEMPT and !PREEMPT, a single implementation of
synchronize_rcu() will work correctly under both configurations.
This commit therefore eliminates a few lines of code by consolidating
the two implementations of synchronize_rcu().
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
parent 3cd4ca47
......@@ -2950,6 +2950,79 @@ void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, rcu_callback_t func)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
/*
* During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
* implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPT.
*
* Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPT, any
* blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
* there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
* either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
* occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
* when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds some
* overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
*/
static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
{
int ret;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
return rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE;
might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
preempt_disable();
ret = num_online_cpus() <= 1;
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
/**
* synchronize_rcu - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
*
* Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
* period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
* read-side critical sections have completed. Note, however, that
* upon return from synchronize_rcu(), the caller might well be executing
* concurrently with new RCU read-side critical sections that began while
* synchronize_rcu() was waiting. RCU read-side critical sections are
* delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.
* In addition, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption, or
* softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
* sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
* and NMI handlers.
*
* Note that this guarantee implies further memory-ordering guarantees.
* On systems with more than one CPU, when synchronize_rcu() returns,
* each CPU is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since
* the end of its last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning
* preceded the call to synchronize_rcu(). In addition, each CPU having
* an RCU read-side critical section that extends beyond the return from
* synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier
* after the beginning of synchronize_rcu() and before the beginning of
* that RCU read-side critical section. Note that these guarantees include
* CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as well as CPUs
* that are executing in the kernel.
*
* Furthermore, if CPU A invoked synchronize_rcu(), which returned
* to its caller on CPU B, then both CPU A and CPU B are guaranteed
* to have executed a full memory barrier during the execution of
* synchronize_rcu() -- even if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but
* again only if the system has more than one CPU).
*/
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
"Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
else
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
/**
* get_state_synchronize_rcu - Snapshot current RCU state
*
......
......@@ -643,33 +643,6 @@ static void _synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
mutex_unlock(&rcu_state.exp_mutex);
}
/*
* During early boot, any blocking grace-period wait automatically
* implies a grace period. Later on, this is never the case for PREEMPT.
*
* Howevr, because a context switch is a grace period for !PREEMPT, any
* blocking grace-period wait automatically implies a grace period if
* there is only one CPU online at any point time during execution of
* either synchronize_rcu() or synchronize_rcu_expedited(). It is OK to
* occasionally incorrectly indicate that there are multiple CPUs online
* when there was in fact only one the whole time, as this just adds some
* overhead: RCU still operates correctly.
*/
static int rcu_blocking_is_gp(void)
{
int ret;
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
return true;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT))
return false;
might_sleep(); /* Check for RCU read-side critical section. */
preempt_disable();
ret = num_online_cpus() <= 1;
preempt_enable();
return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
/*
......
......@@ -825,54 +825,6 @@ static void rcu_flavor_check_callbacks(int user)
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = true;
}
/**
* synchronize_rcu - wait until a grace period has elapsed.
*
* Control will return to the caller some time after a full grace
* period has elapsed, in other words after all currently executing RCU
* read-side critical sections have completed. Note, however, that
* upon return from synchronize_rcu(), the caller might well be executing
* concurrently with new RCU read-side critical sections that began while
* synchronize_rcu() was waiting. RCU read-side critical sections are
* delimited by rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(), and may be nested.
* In addition, regions of code across which interrupts, preemption, or
* softirqs have been disabled also serve as RCU read-side critical
* sections. This includes hardware interrupt handlers, softirq handlers,
* and NMI handlers.
*
* Note that this guarantee implies further memory-ordering guarantees.
* On systems with more than one CPU, when synchronize_rcu() returns,
* each CPU is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier since
* the end of its last RCU read-side critical section whose beginning
* preceded the call to synchronize_rcu(). In addition, each CPU having
* an RCU read-side critical section that extends beyond the return from
* synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed to have executed a full memory barrier
* after the beginning of synchronize_rcu() and before the beginning of
* that RCU read-side critical section. Note that these guarantees include
* CPUs that are offline, idle, or executing in user mode, as well as CPUs
* that are executing in the kernel.
*
* Furthermore, if CPU A invoked synchronize_rcu(), which returned
* to its caller on CPU B, then both CPU A and CPU B are guaranteed
* to have executed a full memory barrier during the execution of
* synchronize_rcu() -- even if CPU A and CPU B are the same CPU (but
* again only if the system has more than one CPU).
*/
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
"Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_INACTIVE)
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
else
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
/*
* Check for a task exiting while in a preemptible-RCU read-side
* critical section, clean up if so. No need to issue warnings,
......@@ -1115,22 +1067,6 @@ static void rcu_flavor_check_callbacks(int user)
}
}
/* PREEMPT=n implementation of synchronize_rcu(). */
void synchronize_rcu(void)
{
RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(lock_is_held(&rcu_bh_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_lock_map) ||
lock_is_held(&rcu_sched_lock_map),
"Illegal synchronize_rcu() in RCU read-side critical section");
if (rcu_blocking_is_gp())
return;
if (rcu_gp_is_expedited())
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
else
wait_rcu_gp(call_rcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu);
/*
* Because preemptible RCU does not exist, tasks cannot possibly exit
* while in preemptible RCU read-side critical sections.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment