Commit e769ece3 authored by Heiko Carstens's avatar Heiko Carstens Committed by Paolo Bonzini

KVM: s390: fix pfmf non-quiescing control handling

Fix the test within handle_pfmf() if the host has the NQ key-setting
facility installed.
Right now the code would incorrectly generate a program check in the
guest if the NQ control bit for a pfmf request was set and if the host
has the NQ key-setting facility installed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarThomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
parent 2b29a9fd
......@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
#include <asm/facility.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/debug.h>
#include <asm/ebcdic.h>
......@@ -532,8 +533,7 @@ static int handle_pfmf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
/* Only provide non-quiescing support if the host supports it */
if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ &&
S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list & 0x00020000)
if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && !test_facility(14))
return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
/* No support for conditional-SSKE */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment