Commit ea0ee339 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds

Revert "x86: CPU: Fix up "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo"

This reverts commit 941f5f0f.

Sadly, it turns out that we really can't just do the cross-CPU IPI to
all CPU's to get their proper frequencies, because it's much too
expensive on systems with lots of cores.

So we'll have to revert this for now, and revisit it using a smarter
model (probably doing one system-wide IPI at open time, and doing all
the frequency calculations in parallel).
Reported-by: default avatarWANG Chao <chao.wang@ucloud.cn>
Reported-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 3e81277a
...@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ obj-y += common.o ...@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ obj-y += common.o
obj-y += rdrand.o obj-y += rdrand.o
obj-y += match.o obj-y += match.o
obj-y += bugs.o obj-y += bugs.o
obj-y += aperfmperf.o obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += aperfmperf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES) += capflags.o powerflags.o obj-$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES) += capflags.o powerflags.o
......
...@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) ...@@ -42,6 +42,10 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy)
s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time); s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
unsigned long flags; unsigned long flags;
/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
return;
local_irq_save(flags); local_irq_save(flags);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf); rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
...@@ -70,7 +74,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy) ...@@ -70,7 +74,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void *dummy)
unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
{ {
s64 time_delta;
unsigned int khz; unsigned int khz;
if (!cpu_khz) if (!cpu_khz)
...@@ -79,12 +82,6 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu) ...@@ -79,12 +82,6 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF)) if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
return 0; return 0;
/* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
return khz;
smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1); smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu); khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
if (khz) if (khz)
......
...@@ -78,10 +78,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) ...@@ -78,10 +78,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode); seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) { if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu); unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
if (!freq)
freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
if (!freq) if (!freq)
freq = cpu_khz; freq = cpu_khz;
seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n", seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment