mm, memcg: Try charging a page before setting page up to date
Historically memcg overhead was high even if memcg was unused. This has improved a lot but it still showed up in a profile summary as being a problem. /usr/src/linux-4.0-vanilla/mm/memcontrol.c 6.6441 395842 mem_cgroup_try_charge 2.950% 175781 __mem_cgroup_count_vm_event 1.431% 85239 mem_cgroup_page_lruvec 0.456% 27156 mem_cgroup_commit_charge 0.392% 23342 uncharge_list 0.323% 19256 mem_cgroup_update_lru_size 0.278% 16538 memcg_check_events 0.216% 12858 mem_cgroup_charge_statistics.isra.22 0.188% 11172 try_charge 0.150% 8928 commit_charge 0.141% 8388 get_mem_cgroup_from_mm 0.121% 7184 That is showing that 6.64% of system CPU cycles were in memcontrol.c and dominated by mem_cgroup_try_charge. The annotation shows that the bulk of the cost was checking PageSwapCache which is expected to be cache hot but is very expensive. The problem appears to be that __SetPageUptodate is called just before the check which is a write barrier. It is required to make sure struct page and page data is written before the PTE is updated and the data visible to userspace. memcg charging does not require or need the barrier but gets unfairly hit with the cost so this patch attempts the charging before the barrier. Aside from the accidental cost to memcg there is the added benefit that the barrier is avoided if the page cannot be charged. When applied the relevant profile summary is as follows. /usr/src/linux-4.0-chargefirst-v2r1/mm/memcontrol.c 3.7907 223277 __mem_cgroup_count_vm_event 1.143% 67312 mem_cgroup_page_lruvec 0.465% 27403 mem_cgroup_commit_charge 0.381% 22452 uncharge_list 0.332% 19543 mem_cgroup_update_lru_size 0.284% 16704 get_mem_cgroup_from_mm 0.271% 15952 mem_cgroup_try_charge 0.237% 13982 memcg_check_events 0.222% 13058 mem_cgroup_charge_statistics.isra.22 0.185% 10920 commit_charge 0.140% 8235 try_charge 0.131% 7716 That brings the overhead down to 3.79% and leaves the memcg fault accounting to the root cgroup but it's an improvement. The difference in headline performance of the page fault microbench is marginal as memcg is such a small component of it. pft faults 4.0.0 4.0.0 vanilla chargefirst Hmean faults/cpu-1 1443258.1051 ( 0.00%) 1509075.7561 ( 4.56%) Hmean faults/cpu-3 1340385.9270 ( 0.00%) 1339160.7113 ( -0.09%) Hmean faults/cpu-5 875599.0222 ( 0.00%) 874174.1255 ( -0.16%) Hmean faults/cpu-7 601146.6726 ( 0.00%) 601370.9977 ( 0.04%) Hmean faults/cpu-8 510728.2754 ( 0.00%) 510598.8214 ( -0.03%) Hmean faults/sec-1 1432084.7845 ( 0.00%) 1497935.5274 ( 4.60%) Hmean faults/sec-3 3943818.1437 ( 0.00%) 3941920.1520 ( -0.05%) Hmean faults/sec-5 3877573.5867 ( 0.00%) 3869385.7553 ( -0.21%) Hmean faults/sec-7 3991832.0418 ( 0.00%) 3992181.4189 ( 0.01%) Hmean faults/sec-8 3987189.8167 ( 0.00%) 3986452.2204 ( -0.02%) It's only visible at single threaded. The overhead is there for higher threads but other factors dominate. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment