Commit ed0ee8e1 authored by Julia Lawall's avatar Julia Lawall Committed by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

V4L/DVB (13948): radio: Correct use after free

It is not clear how to share the unlock in the case where the structure
containing the lock has to be freed.  So the unlock is now duplicated, with
one copy moved before the free.  The unlock label furthermore is no longer
useful and is thus deleted.

A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression x,e;
identifier f;
iterator I;
statement S;
@@

*kfree(x);
... when != &x
    when != x = e
    when != I(x,...) S
*x->f
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
parent e0572325
......@@ -590,8 +590,9 @@ int si470x_fops_release(struct file *file)
video_unregister_device(radio->videodev);
kfree(radio->int_in_buffer);
kfree(radio->buffer);
mutex_unlock(&radio->disconnect_lock);
kfree(radio);
goto unlock;
goto done;
}
/* cancel read processes */
......@@ -601,7 +602,6 @@ int si470x_fops_release(struct file *file)
retval = si470x_stop(radio);
usb_autopm_put_interface(radio->intf);
}
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&radio->disconnect_lock);
done:
return retval;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment