Commit ed9571f0 authored by Joe Thornber's avatar Joe Thornber Committed by Mike Snitzer

dm array: fix a reference counting bug in shadow_ablock

An old array block could have its reference count decremented below
zero when it is being replaced in the btree by a new array block.

The fix is to increment the old ablock's reference count just before
inserting a new ablock into the btree.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoe Thornber <ejt@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.9+
parent 5b564d80
...@@ -317,8 +317,16 @@ static int shadow_ablock(struct dm_array_info *info, dm_block_t *root, ...@@ -317,8 +317,16 @@ static int shadow_ablock(struct dm_array_info *info, dm_block_t *root,
* The shadow op will often be a noop. Only insert if it really * The shadow op will often be a noop. Only insert if it really
* copied data. * copied data.
*/ */
if (dm_block_location(*block) != b) if (dm_block_location(*block) != b) {
/*
* dm_tm_shadow_block will have already decremented the old
* block, but it is still referenced by the btree. We
* increment to stop the insert decrementing it below zero
* when overwriting the old value.
*/
dm_tm_inc(info->btree_info.tm, b);
r = insert_ablock(info, index, *block, root); r = insert_ablock(info, index, *block, root);
}
return r; return r;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment