Commit eecbad7d authored by Andreea-Cristina Bernat's avatar Andreea-Cristina Bernat Committed by Joerg Roedel

iommu: Replace rcu_assign_pointer() with RCU_INIT_POINTER()

The use of "rcu_assign_pointer()" is NULLing out the pointer.
According to RCU_INIT_POINTER()'s block comment:
"1.   This use of RCU_INIT_POINTER() is NULLing out the pointer"
it is better to use it instead of rcu_assign_pointer() because it has a
smaller overhead.

The following Coccinelle semantic patch was used:
@@
@@

- rcu_assign_pointer
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER
  (..., NULL)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndreea-Cristina Bernat <bernat.ada@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJoerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
parent f63ef690
...@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ int dmar_remove_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info, u16 segment, ...@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ int dmar_remove_dev_scope(struct dmar_pci_notify_info *info, u16 segment,
for_each_active_dev_scope(devices, count, index, tmp) for_each_active_dev_scope(devices, count, index, tmp)
if (tmp == &info->dev->dev) { if (tmp == &info->dev->dev) {
rcu_assign_pointer(devices[index].dev, NULL); RCU_INIT_POINTER(devices[index].dev, NULL);
synchronize_rcu(); synchronize_rcu();
put_device(tmp); put_device(tmp);
return 1; return 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment