Commit f1191b50 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro

check_unsafe_exec() doesn't care about signal handlers sharing

... since we'll unshare sighand anyway
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 498052bb
......@@ -1060,23 +1060,20 @@ int check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
{
struct task_struct *p = current, *t;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned n_fs, n_sighand;
unsigned n_fs;
int res = 0;
bprm->unsafe = tracehook_unsafe_exec(p);
n_fs = 1;
n_sighand = 1;
write_lock(&p->fs->lock);
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
for (t = next_thread(p); t != p; t = next_thread(t)) {
if (t->fs == p->fs)
n_fs++;
n_sighand++;
}
if (p->fs->users > n_fs ||
atomic_read(&p->sighand->count) > n_sighand) {
if (p->fs->users > n_fs) {
bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE;
} else {
if (p->fs->in_exec)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment