Commit f3dc74c0 authored by John Harrison's avatar John Harrison Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Rename 'do_execbuf' to 'execbuf_submit'

The submission portion of the execbuffer code path was abstracted into a
function pointer indirection as part of the legacy vs execlist work. The two
implementation functions are called 'i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission' and
'intel_execlists_submission' but the pointer was called 'do_execbuf'. There is
already a 'i915_gem_do_execbuffer' function (which is what calls the pointer
indirection). The name of the pointer is therefore considered to be backwards
and should be changed.

This patch renames it to 'execbuf_submit' which is hopefully a bit clearer.

For: VIZ-5115
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 1652d19e
...@@ -1814,13 +1814,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private { ...@@ -1814,13 +1814,13 @@ struct drm_i915_private {
/* Abstract the submission mechanism (legacy ringbuffer or execlists) away */ /* Abstract the submission mechanism (legacy ringbuffer or execlists) away */
struct { struct {
int (*do_execbuf)(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file, int (*execbuf_submit)(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file,
struct intel_engine_cs *ring, struct intel_engine_cs *ring,
struct intel_context *ctx, struct intel_context *ctx,
struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args, struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *args,
struct list_head *vmas, struct list_head *vmas,
struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj, struct drm_i915_gem_object *batch_obj,
u64 exec_start, u32 flags); u64 exec_start, u32 flags);
int (*init_rings)(struct drm_device *dev); int (*init_rings)(struct drm_device *dev);
void (*cleanup_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); void (*cleanup_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
void (*stop_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring); void (*stop_ring)(struct intel_engine_cs *ring);
......
...@@ -4859,12 +4859,12 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev) ...@@ -4859,12 +4859,12 @@ int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
} }
if (!i915.enable_execlists) { if (!i915.enable_execlists) {
dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission; dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = i915_gem_ringbuffer_submission;
dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings; dev_priv->gt.init_rings = i915_gem_init_rings;
dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer; dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_cleanup_ring_buffer;
dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_stop_ring_buffer; dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_stop_ring_buffer;
} else { } else {
dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf = intel_execlists_submission; dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit = intel_execlists_submission;
dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init; dev_priv->gt.init_rings = intel_logical_rings_init;
dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup; dev_priv->gt.cleanup_ring = intel_logical_ring_cleanup;
dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_logical_ring_stop; dev_priv->gt.stop_ring = intel_logical_ring_stop;
......
...@@ -1601,9 +1601,9 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, ...@@ -1601,9 +1601,9 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
} else } else
exec_start += i915_gem_obj_offset(batch_obj, vm); exec_start += i915_gem_obj_offset(batch_obj, vm);
ret = dev_priv->gt.do_execbuf(dev, file, ring, ctx, args, ret = dev_priv->gt.execbuf_submit(dev, file, ring, ctx, args,
&eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start, &eb->vmas, batch_obj, exec_start,
dispatch_flags); dispatch_flags);
/* /*
* FIXME: We crucially rely upon the active tracking for the (ppgtt) * FIXME: We crucially rely upon the active tracking for the (ppgtt)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment