Commit f8b703da authored by Fan Li's avatar Fan Li Committed by Jaegeuk Kim

f2fs: fix to update cached_en of extent tree properly

In f2fs_lookup_extent_tree, et->cached_en was read and updated with only
read lock held,
it could cause __lookup_extent_tree within return entirely wrong
extent_node, if other
thread update et->cached_en just before __lookup_extent_tree return.

However, there are two things about this patch that need to be noticed:
1. It does no good to arrange the order of concurrent read/write, the result
would still
be random in such case.
2. It's built on this assumption: the mix up of reads and writes on a single
pointer would
not make the pointer partially wrong at any time. Please let me know if I'm
wrong, thx.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFan li <fanofcode.li@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
parent 217940d4
...@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@ static struct extent_node *__lookup_extent_tree(struct extent_tree *et, ...@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@ static struct extent_node *__lookup_extent_tree(struct extent_tree *et,
unsigned int fofs) unsigned int fofs)
{ {
struct rb_node *node = et->root.rb_node; struct rb_node *node = et->root.rb_node;
struct extent_node *en; struct extent_node *en = et->cached_en;
if (et->cached_en) { if (en) {
struct extent_info *cei = &et->cached_en->ei; struct extent_info *cei = &en->ei;
if (cei->fofs <= fofs && cei->fofs + cei->len > fofs) if (cei->fofs <= fofs && cei->fofs + cei->len > fofs)
return et->cached_en; return en;
} }
while (node) { while (node) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment