Commit fa1d113a authored by David Howells's avatar David Howells

rxrpc: Fix some missing _bh annotations on locking conn->state_lock

conn->state_lock may be taken in softirq mode, but a previous patch
replaced an outer lock in the response-packet event handling code, and lost
the _bh from that when doing so.

Fix this by applying the _bh annotation to the state_lock locking.

Fixes: a1399f8b ("rxrpc: Call channels should have separate call number spaces")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
parent 9a059cd5
......@@ -340,18 +340,18 @@ static int rxrpc_process_event(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
return ret;
spin_lock(&conn->channel_lock);
spin_lock(&conn->state_lock);
spin_lock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
if (conn->state == RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE_CHALLENGING) {
conn->state = RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE;
spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
for (loop = 0; loop < RXRPC_MAXCALLS; loop++)
rxrpc_call_is_secure(
rcu_dereference_protected(
conn->channels[loop].call,
lockdep_is_held(&conn->channel_lock)));
} else {
spin_unlock(&conn->state_lock);
spin_unlock_bh(&conn->state_lock);
}
spin_unlock(&conn->channel_lock);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment