Commit fc129a43 authored by Douglas Anderson's avatar Douglas Anderson Committed by Mark Brown

spi: spi-geni-qcom: Use the FIFO even more

In commit 902481a7 ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Actually use our FIFO") I
explained that the maximum size we could program the FIFO was
"mas->tx_fifo_depth - 3" but that I chose "mas->tx_fifo_depth()"
because I was worried about decreased bandwidth.

Since that time:
* All the interconnect patches have landed, making things run at the
  proper speed.
* I've done more measurements.

This lets me confirm that there's really no downside of using the FIFO
more.  Specifically I did "flashrom -p ec -r /tmp/foo.bin" on a
Chromebook and averaged over several runs.

Before: It took 6.66 seconds and 59669 interrupts fired.
After:  It took 6.66 seconds and 47992 interrupts fired.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200912140730.1.Ie67fa32009b94702d56232c064f1d89065ee8836@changeidSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent bfc430ca
......@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static int spi_geni_init(struct spi_geni_master *mas)
* Hardware programming guide suggests to configure
* RX FIFO RFR level to fifo_depth-2.
*/
geni_se_init(se, mas->tx_fifo_depth / 2, mas->tx_fifo_depth - 2);
geni_se_init(se, mas->tx_fifo_depth - 3, mas->tx_fifo_depth - 2);
/* Transmit an entire FIFO worth of data per IRQ */
mas->tx_wm = 1;
ver = geni_se_get_qup_hw_version(se);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment