Commit ff6c6fed authored by Jaswinder Singh Rajput's avatar Jaswinder Singh Rajput Committed by Ingo Molnar

x86: pci-swiotlb.c swiotlb_dma_ops should be static

Impact: reduce kernel size a bit, address sparse warning

Addresses the problem pointed out by this sparse warning:

  arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:53:20: warning: symbol 'swiotlb_dma_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?

For x86: swiotlb_dma_ops can be static, because it's not used outside
of pci-swiotlb.c
Signed-off-by: default avatarJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarFUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
LKML-Reference: <1239558861.3938.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 0c3c8a18
...@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size, ...@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags); return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
} }
struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = { static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
.mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error, .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
.alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent, .alloc_coherent = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
.free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent, .free_coherent = swiotlb_free_coherent,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment