The dapm field of the snd_soc_codec struct will eventually be removed
(replaced with the DAPM context from the component embedded inside the
CODEC). Replace its usage with the card's DAPM context. The idea is that
DAPM is hierarchical and with the card at the root it is possible to access
widgets from other contexts through the card context.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

There are no users of snd_soc_jack_new() left and new users should use
snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead. So remove the function.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The jacks are card level elements so use snd_soc_card_jack_new() instead of
snd_soc_jack_new() to register them.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Jacks are typically card level elements, but are currently registered with a
CODEC. When it was originally introduced snd_soc_jack_new() took a
snd_soc_card as its parameter, but at that time DAPM was only implemented at
the CODEC level and there was only one CODEC per card. This made it clear
which CODEC to use for the jack DAPM operations. But the multi-component
patchset added support for having multiple CODECs per card and with it the
API was updated to register jacks with a specific CODEC instance instead.
Subsequently DAPM support at the card level has been introduced, but the
snd_soc_jack_new() API has so remained unchanged.

This leaves us with the issue that the DAPM pins that are managed by the
jack detection logic usually are part of the card DAPM context but are
accessed through a CODEC DAPM context. Currently this works fine, but might
break in the future if we take a more hierarchical approach to DAPM
contexts.

Furthermore with componentization progressing systems that do not register
a snd_soc_codec might appear, while these system may still want to able to
register a jack.

This patch addresses these issues by adding a new function called
snd_soc_card_jack_new() that can be used to register jacks with the card
rather than a CODEC.

This new function is mostly identical to snd_soc_jack_new() except that it
additionally allows to directly specify the DAPM pins associated with the
jack. This was done since most users of snd_soc_jack_new() typically call
snd_soc_jack_add_pins() right after it, which is not necessary with the new
API and allows to reduce the amount of boiler plate code.

The old snd_soc_jack_new() is re-implemented as a wrapper around
snd_soc_card_jack_new().
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

The sn95031 driver currently gets the CODEC implicitly from the jack that is
passed to sn95031_jack_detection(). But the codec field is going to be
removed from the snd_soc_jack struct, so refactor things to pass the CODEC
explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

.. after extensive statistical analysis of my G+ polling, I've come to
the inescapable conclusion that internet polls are bad.

Big surprise.

But "Hurr durr I'ma sheep" trounced "I like online polls" by a 62-to-38%
margin, in a poll that people weren't even supposed to participate in.
Who can argue with solid numbers like that? 5,796 votes from people who
can't even follow the most basic directions?

In contrast, "v4.0" beat out "v3.20" by a slimmer margin of 56-to-44%,
but with a total of 29,110 votes right now.

Now, arguably, that vote spread is only about 3,200 votes, which is less
than the almost six thousand votes that the "please ignore" poll got, so
it could be considered noise.

But hey, I asked, so I'll honor the votes.

Pull ext4 fixes from Ted Ts'o:
 "Ext4 bug fixes.

  We also reserved code points for encryption and read-only images (for
  which the implementation is mostly just the reserved code point for a
  read-only feature :-)"

* tag 'ext4_for_linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
  ext4: fix indirect punch hole corruption
  ext4: ignore journal checksum on remount; don't fail
  ext4: remove duplicate remount check for JOURNAL_CHECKSUM change
  ext4: fix mmap data corruption in nodelalloc mode when blocksize < pagesize
  ext4: support read-only images
  ext4: change to use setup_timer() instead of init_timer()
  ext4: reserve codepoints used by the ext4 encryption feature
  jbd2: complain about descriptor block checksum errors

Pull more vfs updates from Al Viro:
 "Assorted stuff from this cycle.  The big ones here are multilayer
  overlayfs from Miklos and beginning of sorting ->d_inode accesses out
  from David"

* 'for-linus-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs: (51 commits)
  autofs4 copy_dev_ioctl(): keep the value of ->size we'd used for allocation
  procfs: fix race between symlink removals and traversals
  debugfs: leave freeing a symlink body until inode eviction
  Documentation/filesystems/Locking: ->get_sb() is long gone
  trylock_super(): replacement for grab_super_passive()
  fanotify: Fix up scripted S_ISDIR/S_ISREG/S_ISLNK conversions
  Cachefiles: Fix up scripted S_ISDIR/S_ISREG/S_ISLNK conversions
  VFS: (Scripted) Convert S_ISLNK/DIR/REG(dentry->d_inode) to d_is_*(dentry)
  SELinux: Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode
  Smack: Use d_is_positive() rather than testing dentry->d_inode
  TOMOYO: Use d_is_dir() rather than d_inode and S_ISDIR()
  Apparmor: Use d_is_positive/negative() rather than testing dentry->d_inode
  Apparmor: mediated_filesystem() should use dentry->d_sb not inode->i_sb
  VFS: Split DCACHE_FILE_TYPE into regular and special types
  VFS: Add a fallthrough flag for marking virtual dentries
  VFS: Add a whiteout dentry type
  VFS: Introduce inode-getting helpers for layered/unioned fs environments
  Infiniband: Fix potential NULL d_inode dereference
  posix_acl: fix reference leaks in posix_acl_create
  autofs4: Wrong format for printing dentry
  ...

Pull ARM fix from Russell King:
 "Just one fix this time around.  __iommu_alloc_buffer() can cause a
  BUG() if dma_alloc_coherent() is called with either __GFP_DMA32 or
  __GFP_HIGHMEM set.  The patch from Alexandre addresses this"

* 'fixes' of git://ftp.arm.linux.org.uk/~rmk/linux-arm:
  ARM: 8305/1: DMA: Fix kzalloc flags in __iommu_alloc_buffer()

X-Coverup: just ask spender
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

use_pde()/unuse_pde() in ->follow_link()/->put_link() resp.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

As it is, we have debugfs_remove() racing with symlink traversals.
Supply ->evict_inode() and do freeing there - inode will remain
pinned until we are done with the symlink body.

And rip the idiocy with checking if dentry is positive right after
we'd verified debugfs_positive(), which is a stronger check...

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

I've noticed significant locking contention in memory reclaimer around
sb_lock inside grab_super_passive(). Grab_super_passive() is called from
two places: in icache/dcache shrinkers (function super_cache_scan) and
from writeback (function __writeback_inodes_wb). Both are required for
progress in memory allocator.

Grab_super_passive() acquires sb_lock to increment sb->s_count and check
sb->s_instances. It seems sb->s_umount locked for read is enough here:
super-block deactivation always runs under sb->s_umount locked for write.
Protecting super-block itself isn't a problem: in super_cache_scan() sb
is protected by shrinker_rwsem: it cannot be freed if its slab shrinkers
are still active. Inside writeback super-block comes from inode from bdi
writeback list under wb->list_lock.

This patch removes locking sb_lock and checks s_instances under s_umount:
generic_shutdown_super() unlinks it under sb->s_umount locked for write.
New variant is called trylock_super() and since it only locks semaphore,
callers must call up_read(&sb->s_umount) instead of drop_super(sb) when
they're done.
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>