This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-24-jic23@kernel.org

This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannanece23@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-23-jic23@kernel.org

This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Tancerel <ludovic.tancerel@maplehightech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-22-jic23@kernel.org

This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregor Boirie <gregor.boirie@parrot.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-21-jic23@kernel.org

This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and is
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Ludovic Tancerel <ludovic.tancerel@maplehightech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-20-jic23@kernel.org

These prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomasz Duszynski <tduszyns@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-19-jic23@kernel.org

These prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@invensense.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-18-jic23@kernel.org

This change allows use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and removes
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-17-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent the use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-16-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent the use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-15-jic23@kernel.org

This enables use of ACPI PRP0001 and removes an antipattern I am
trying to stop people copying in IIO.

This particular case is more complex than most because it allowed
probing via sysfs with out a fwnode but would presumably always
have then failed.   Now the code will assume that properties are
the defaults if not specified or the firmware node is not present.
This relaxation of the constraints should not break any existing
cases and may enable some new ones.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-14-jic23@kernel.org

This prevents use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.

Also add mod_devicetable.h include given struct of_device_id is
declared there.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-13-jic23@kernel.org

These result in a very small reduction in driver size, but at the
cost of more complex build and slightly harder to read code.
In the case of of_match_ptr it also prevents use of PRP0001
ACPI based identification.  In this particular case we have
a valid ACPI/PNP ID that I am assuming was issued by Analog
Devices.  That should be used in preference to PRP0001 but doesn't
mean we should prevent that route.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-12-jic23@kernel.org

These result in a very small reduction in driver size, but at the
cost of more complex build and slightly harder to read code.
In the case of of_match_ptr it also prevents use of PRP0001
ACPI based identification.  In this particular case we have
a valid ACPI/PNP ID that I am assuming was issued by Analog
Devices.  That should be used in preference to PRP0001 but doesn't
mean we should prevent that route.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-11-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-10-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Hence drop them from this driver.

Also switch to device_get_match_data() from of_ variant and adjust
headers to reflect the change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-9-jic23@kernel.org

This change allows the use of the driver with ACPI via PRP0001
and remove an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Also adjust includes to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-8-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Also use device_get_match_data() rather than devicetree only version.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-7-jic23@kernel.org

Given that an ACPI binding must start with 3 or 4 capitals,
this cannot represent a valid binding.

It seems unlikely anything out there is using it.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Maury Anderson <maury.anderson@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-6-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Whilst this driver has an ACPI binding, it is not of a form
that is valid under ACPI so will be dropped shortly.

Also switch to device_get_match_data() and switch headers.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Maury Anderson <maury.anderson@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Matthew Weber <matthew.weber@rockwellcollins.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-5-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Drop them to remove this restriction.

Also switch headers to reflect this change.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kaiser <martin@kaiser.cx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-4-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Drop them to remove this restriction.

Also switch of.h for mod_devicetable.h include given use of
struct of_device_id which is defined in that header.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Slawomir Stepien <sst@poczta.fm>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-3-jic23@kernel.org

These prevent use of this driver with ACPI via PRP0001 and are
an example of an anti pattern I'm trying to remove from IIO.
Drop them to remove this restriction.

Also added mod_devicetable.h include given use of struct of_device_id
which is defined in that header.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Reid <preid@eletromag.com.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200910173242.621168-2-jic23@kernel.org

I'd like to be enable W=1 for all IIO builds as it catches real issues as well
as more minor documentation issues such as this (also good to fix though!)

drivers/iio/imu/adis16400.c:183: warning: Function parameter or member 'avail_scan_mask' not described in 'adis16400_state'
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200913132115.800131-2-jic23@kernel.org

Currently the iio_buffer_{alloc,free}_sysfs_and_mask() take 'indio_dev' as
primary argument. This change splits the main logic into a private function
that takes an IIO buffer as primary argument.

That way, the functions can be extended to configure the sysfs for multiple
buffers.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200917125951.861-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use only one line for the closing bracket of the last entry and the
opening bracket for the next one to keep the style across the whole
array consistent. Also add a "sentinel" comment to the last entry and
remove the comma to ensure that there won't be any entry after it.
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915192621.13202-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

The proper error code should be ENODEV (vs EINVAL) in case the chip ID
isn't recognized.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916082221.72851-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

We should probably print what the expected chip-ID is. We already have
that information available, based on the device specified via
device-tree.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916083128.73729-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

These docs are both suffering from being out of date, and from being
superceeded by the documentation in Documentation/driver-api/iio

Note the inkern.txt drop is left for now as this is an area not
well covered by the more recent documentation outside staging.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200905174721.216452-5-jic23@kernel.org

There are no remaining light drivers in staging/iio.
The content of this file are either included in the non staging
ABI docs, or don't seem to be used in any current driver.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200905174721.216452-4-jic23@kernel.org

These seem to be up to date but never moved out of staging when the driver
did. Hence let us move them out now.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Cc: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200905174721.216452-3-jic23@kernel.org

Whilst there is some useful info in here, it can be easily
obtained from datasheets. Some of the info should perhaps
be incorporated into a device tree bindings doc.
As this didn't move out of staging with the driver, I'm suggesting
we just drop it.  We don't generally carry per driver documentation
with the exception of non standard ABI which is not the case here.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200905174721.216452-2-jic23@kernel.org

module_platform_driver() makes the code simpler by eliminating
boilerplate code.
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914065401.3726354-1-liushixin2@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Drop `adis_setup_buffer_and_trigger()`. All users were updated to use
the devm version of this function. This avoids having almost the same
code repeated.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-11-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-10-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-9-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-8-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-7-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-6-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>

Use the adis managed device functions to setup the buffer and the trigger.
The ultimate goal will be to completely drop the non devm version from
the lib.

Since we are here, drop the `.remove` callback by further using devm
functions.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200915120258.161587-5-nuno.sa@analog.comSigned-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>