Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 04 Nov, 2019 2 commits
  3. 02 Nov, 2019 4 commits
  5. 24 Oct, 2019 1 commit
  7. 10 Oct, 2019 8 commits
  9. 07 Oct, 2019 22 commits
  11. 06 Oct, 2019 3 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Linux 5.4-rc2 · da0c9ea1
      Linus Torvalds authored
      da0c9ea1
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      elf: don't use MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE for elf executable mappings · b212921b
      Linus Torvalds authored 
      In commit 4ed28639 ("fs, elf: drop MAP_FIXED usage from elf_map") we
changed elf to use MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE instead of MAP_FIXED for the
executable mappings.

Then, people reported that it broke some binaries that had overlapping
segments from the same file, and commit ad55eac7 ("elf: enforce
MAP_FIXED on overlaying elf segments") re-instated MAP_FIXED for some
overlaying elf segment cases.  But only some - despite the summary line
of that commit, it only did it when it also does a temporary brk vma for
one obvious overlapping case.

Now Russell King reports another overlapping case with old 32-bit x86
binaries, which doesn't trigger that limited case.  End result: we had
better just drop MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE entirely, and go back to MAP_FIXED.

Yes, it's a sign of old binaries generated with old tool-chains, but we
do pride ourselves on not breaking existing setups.

This still leaves MAP_FIXED_NOREPLACE in place for the load_elf_interp()
and the old load_elf_library() use-cases, because nobody has reported
breakage for those. Yet.

Note that in all the cases seen so far, the overlapping elf sections
seem to be just re-mapping of the same executable with different section
attributes.  We could possibly introduce a new MAP_FIXED_NOFILECHANGE
flag or similar, which acts like NOREPLACE, but allows just remapping
the same executable file using different protection flags.

It's not clear that would make a huge difference to anything, but if
people really hate that "elf remaps over previous maps" behavior, maybe
at least a more limited form of remapping would alleviate some concerns.

Alternatively, we should take a look at our elf_map() logic to see if we
end up not mapping things properly the first time.

In the meantime, this is the minimal "don't do that then" patch while
people hopefully think about it more.
Reported-by: default avatarRussell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Fixes: 4ed28639 ("fs, elf: drop MAP_FIXED usage from elf_map")
Fixes: ad55eac7 ("elf: enforce  MAP_FIXED on overlaying elf segments")
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b212921b
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge tag 'dma-mapping-5.4-1' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping · 7cdb85df
      Linus Torvalds authored 
      Pull dma-mapping regression fix from Christoph Hellwig:
 "Revert an incorret hunk from a patch that caused problems on various
  arm boards (Andrey Smirnov)"

* tag 'dma-mapping-5.4-1' of git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping:
  dma-mapping: fix false positive warnings in dma_common_free_remap()
      7cdb85df
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7