In the extent_same ioctl, we were grabbing the pages (locked) and
attempting to read them without bothering about any concurrent IO
against them. That is, we were not checking for any ongoing ordered
extents nor waiting for them to complete, which leads to a race where
the extent_same() code gets a checksum verification error when it
reads the pages, producing a message like the following in dmesg
and making the operation fail to user space with -ENOMEM:

[18990.161265] BTRFS warning (device sdc): csum failed ino 259 off 495616 csum 685204116 expected csum 1515870868

Fix this by using btrfs_readpage() for reading the pages instead of
extent_read_full_page_nolock(), which waits for any concurrent ordered
extents to complete and locks the io range. Also do better error handling
and don't treat all failures as -ENOMEM, as that's clearly misleasing,
becoming identical to the checks and operation of prepare_uptodate_page().

The use of extent_read_full_page_nolock() was required before
commit f4414602 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with extent-same and readpage"),
as we had the range locked in an inode's io tree before attempting to
read the pages.

Fixes: f4414602 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with extent-same and readpage")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

In the extent_same ioctl we are getting the pages for the source and
target ranges and unlocking them immediately after, which is incorrect
because later we attempt to map them (with kmap_atomic) and access their
contents at btrfs_cmp_data(). When we do such access the pages might have
been relocated or removed from memory, which leads to an invalid memory
access. This issue is detected on a kernel with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
which produces a trace like the following:

186736.677437] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[186736.680382] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod ppdev xor raid6_pq sha256_generic hmac drbg ansi_cprng acpi_cpufreq evdev sg aesni_intel aes_x86_64
parport_pc ablk_helper tpm_tis psmouse parport i2c_piix4 tpm cryptd i2c_core lrw processor button serio_raw pcspkr gf128mul glue_helper loop autofs4 ext4
crc16 mbcache jbd2 sd_mod sr_mod cdrom ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring crc32c_intel scsi_mod e1000 virtio floppy [last
unloaded: btrfs]
[186736.681319] CPU: 13 PID: 10222 Comm: duperemove Tainted: G        W       4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[186736.681319] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[186736.681319] task: ffff880132600400 ti: ffff880362284000 task.ti: ffff880362284000
[186736.681319] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81264d00>]  [<ffffffff81264d00>] memcmp+0xb/0x22
[186736.681319] RSP: 0018:ffff880362287d70  EFLAGS: 00010287
[186736.681319] RAX: 000002c002468acf RBX: 0000000012345678 RCX: 0000000000000000
[186736.681319] RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 0005d129c5cf9000 RDI: 0005d129c5cf9000
[186736.681319] RBP: ffff880362287d70 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000001000
[186736.681319] R10: ffff880000000000 R11: 0000000000000476 R12: 0000000000001000
[186736.681319] R13: ffff8802f91d4c88 R14: ffff8801f2a77830 R15: ffff880352e83e40
[186736.681319] FS:  00007f27b37fe700(0000) GS:ffff88043dda0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[186736.681319] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[186736.681319] CR2: 00007f27a406a000 CR3: 0000000217421000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[186736.681319] Stack:
[186736.681319]  ffff880362287ea0 ffffffffa048d0bd 000000000009f000 0000000000001000
[186736.681319]  0100000000000000 ffff8801f2a77850 ffff8802f91d49b0 ffff880132600400
[186736.681319]  00000000000004f8 ffff8801c1efbe41 0000000000000000 0000000000000038
[186736.681319] Call Trace:
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffffa048d0bd>] btrfs_ioctl+0x24cb/0x2731 [btrfs]
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8108a8b0>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118b3d4>] ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3e/0x5d
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff811822f8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x42b/0x4ea
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118b4f3>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[186736.681319]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[186736.681319] Code: 0a 3c 6e 74 0d 3c 79 74 04 3c 59 75 0c c6 06 01 eb 03 c6 06 00 31 c0 eb 05 b8 ea ff ff ff 5d c3 55 31 c9 48 89 e5 48 39 d1 74 13 <0f> b6
04 0f 44 0f b6 04 0e 48 ff c1 44 29 c0 74 ea eb 02 31 c0

(gdb) list *(btrfs_ioctl+0x24cb)
0x5e0e1 is in btrfs_ioctl (fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2972).
2967                    dst_addr = kmap_atomic(dst_page);
2968
2969                    flush_dcache_page(src_page);
2970                    flush_dcache_page(dst_page);
2971
2972                    if (memcmp(addr, dst_addr, cmp_len))
2973                            ret = BTRFS_SAME_DATA_DIFFERS;
2974
2975                    kunmap_atomic(addr);
2976                    kunmap_atomic(dst_addr);

So fix this by making sure we keep the pages locked and respect the same
locking order as everywhere else: get and lock the pages first and then
lock the range in the inode's io tree (like for example at
__btrfs_buffered_write() and extent_readpages()). If an ordered extent
is found after locking the range in the io tree, unlock the range,
unlock the pages, wait for the ordered extent to complete and repeat the
entire locking process until no overlapping ordered extents are found.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

This reverts commit 14e46e04.

This ends up doing sysfs operations from deep in balance (where we
should be GFP_NOFS) and under heavy balance load, we're making races
against sysfs internals.

Revert it for now while we figure things out.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This was copied incorrectly from the __vmalloc call.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Merge branch 'dev/fst-followup' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5

If the mount phase is not finished, we can't update the sysfs files.
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

This reverts commit 69624913. The
cleaner thread can block freezing when there's a snapshot cleaning in
progress and the other threads get suspended first. From the logs
provided by Martin we're waiting for reading extent pages:

kernel: PM: Syncing filesystems ... done.
kernel: Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.015 seconds) done.
kernel: Freezing remaining freezable tasks ...
kernel: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.003 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0):
kernel: btrfs-cleaner   D ffff88033dd13bc0     0   152      2 0x00000000
kernel: ffff88032ebc2e00 ffff88032e750000 ffff88032e74fa50 7fffffffffffffff
kernel: ffffffff814a58df 0000000000000002 ffffea000934d580 ffffffff814a5451
kernel: 7fffffffffffffff ffffffff814a6e8f 0000000000000000 0000000000000020
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: [<ffffffff814a58df>] ? bit_wait+0x2c/0x2c
kernel: [<ffffffff814a5451>] ? schedule+0x6f/0x7c
kernel: [<ffffffff814a6e8f>] ? schedule_timeout+0x2f/0xd8
kernel: [<ffffffff81076f94>] ? timekeeping_get_ns+0xa/0x2e
kernel: [<ffffffff81077603>] ? ktime_get+0x36/0x44
kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
kernel: [<ffffffff814a4f6c>] ? io_schedule_timeout+0x94/0xf2
kernel: [<ffffffff814a590b>] ? bit_wait_io+0x2c/0x30
kernel: [<ffffffff814a5694>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x41/0x73
kernel: [<ffffffff8109eba8>] ? wait_on_page_bit+0x6d/0x72
kernel: [<ffffffff8105d718>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x2a/0x2a
kernel: [<ffffffff811a02d7>] ? read_extent_buffer_pages+0x1bd/0x203
kernel: [<ffffffff8117d9e9>] ? free_root_pointers+0x4c/0x4c
kernel: [<ffffffff8117e831>] ? btree_read_extent_buffer_pages.constprop.57+0x5a/0xe9
kernel: [<ffffffff8117f4f3>] ? read_tree_block+0x2d/0x45
kernel: [<ffffffff8116782a>] ? read_block_for_search.isra.34+0x22a/0x26b
kernel: [<ffffffff811656c3>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x1e/0x4a
kernel: [<ffffffff8116919b>] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x648/0x736
kernel: [<ffffffff81170559>] ? btrfs_lookup_extent_info+0xb7/0x2c7
kernel: [<ffffffff81170ee5>] ? walk_down_proc+0x9c/0x1ae
kernel: [<ffffffff81171c9d>] ? walk_down_tree+0x40/0xa4
kernel: [<ffffffff8117375f>] ? btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x2da/0x664
kernel: [<ffffffff8104ff21>] ? finish_task_switch+0x126/0x167
kernel: [<ffffffff811850f8>] ? btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xa6/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff8117eaba>] ? cleaner_kthread+0x13e/0x17b
kernel: [<ffffffff8117e97c>] ? btrfs_item_end+0x33/0x33
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d256>] ? kthread+0x95/0x9d
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16
kernel: [<ffffffff814a7b5f>] ? ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70
kernel: [<ffffffff8104d1c1>] ? kthread_parkme+0x16/0x16

As this affects a released kernel (4.4) we need a minimal fix for
stable kernels.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108361Reported-by: Martin Ziegler <ziegler@uni-freiburg.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4
CC: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Parameter of trace_btrfs_work_queued() can be freed in its workqueue.
So no one use use that pointer after queue_work().

Fix the user-after-free bug by move the trace line before queue_work().
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

An fsync, using the fast path, can race with a concurrent lockless direct
IO write and end up logging a file extent item that points to an extent
that wasn't written to yet. This is because the fast fsync path collects
ordered extents into a local list and then collects all the new extent
maps to log file extent items based on them, while the direct IO write
path creates the new extent map before it creates the corresponding
ordered extent (and submitting the respective bio(s)).

So fix this by making the direct IO write path create ordered extents
before the extent maps and make the fast fsync path collect any new
ordered extents after it collects the extent maps.
Note that making the fsync handler call inode_dio_wait() (after acquiring
the inode's i_mutex) would not work and lead to a deadlock when doing
AIO, as through AIO we end up in a path where the fsync handler is called
(through dio_aio_complete_work() -> dio_complete() -> vfs_fsync_range())
before the inode's dio counter is decremented (inode_dio_wait() waits
for this counter to have a value of zero).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Merge branch 'fix/fst-sysfs' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The requested bitmap size varies, observed numbers were < 4K up to 16K.
Using vmalloc unconditionally would be too heavy, we'll try contiguous
allocations first and fall back to vmalloc if there's no contig memory.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There's no reason to do GFP_NOFS in tests, it's not data-heavy and
memory allocation failures would affect only developers or testers.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The files under /sys/fs/UUID/features get out of sync with the actual
incompat bits set for the filesystem if they change after mount (eg. the
LZO compression).

Synchronize the feature bits with the sysfs files representing them
right after we set/clear them.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The files under /sys/fs/UUID/features get out of sync with the actual
incompat bits set for the filesystem if they change after mount. We're
going to sync them and need a helper to do that.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The incompat bit representing the newly added free space tree feature is
missing. Right now it will be listed only among features supported by
the module, not per-fs.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

No need to create additional end_io function for scrub, it increased
code size and introduced some un-unified lines, as:
raid_write_parity_end_io():
        int err = bio->bi_error;
        if (bio->bi_error)
raid_write_end_io():
        int err = bio->bi_error;
        if (err)

This patch combines them.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

PageUptodate flag already initialized to 0 for new page,
no need to set it again.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We can use rbio->stripe_npages to reduce unnecessary calculation in
many code place.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We are using different index calculation method for stripe_page in
current code:
1: (rbio->stripe_len / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
2: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) * stripe_index + page_index
3: DIV_ROUND_UP(rbio->stripe_len * stripe_index, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) + page_index
...

They can get same result when stripe_len align to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE,
this is why current code can work, intruduce and use a common function
for calculation is a better choose.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Current code is trying to calculate rbio->dbitmap's size to make it
align to sizeof(long), but implement haven't achived this object,
it is align to sizeof(char) instead.
This patch fixed above calculation, and use sizeof(long) instead of
fixed "8" to increate compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

I see no_space in v4.4-rc1 again in xfstests generic/102.
It happened randomly in some node only.
(one of 4 phy-node, and a kvm with non-virtio block driver)

By bisect, we can found the first-bad is:
 commit bdced438 ("block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting")'
But above patch only triggered the bug by making bio operation
faster(or slower).

Main reason is in our space_allocating code, we need to commit
page writeback before wait it complish, this patch fixed above
bug.

BTW, there is another reason for generic/102 fail, caused by
disable default mixed-blockgroup, I'll fix it in xfstests.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

wait_for_snapshot_creation() is in same group with oher two:
 btrfs_start_write_no_snapshoting()
 btrfs_end_write_no_snapshoting()

Rename wait_for_snapshot_creation() and move it into same place
with other two.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

size_t write_bytes is not necessary for btrfs_copy_from_user(),
delete it.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old code used bbio->raid_map to determine whether in raid56
write/recover operation, because we didn't't have bbio->map_type.

Now we have direct way for this condition, rid of using
the function-relative data, and make the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

1: Adjust condition in loop to make less TAB
2: Move btrfs_put_bbio()'s line for combine, and makes logic clean.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Enhance chunk validation:
1) Num_stripes
   We already have such check but it's only in super block sys chunk
   array.
   Now check all on-disk chunks.

2) Chunk logical
   It should be aligned to sector size.
   This behavior should be *DOUBLE CHECKED* for 64K sector size like
   PPC64 or AArch64.
   Maybe we can found some hidden bugs.

3) Chunk length
   Same as chunk logical, should be aligned to sector size.

4) Stripe length
   It should be power of 2.

5) Chunk type
   Any bit out of TYPE_MAS | PROFILE_MASK is invalid.

With all these much restrict rules, several fuzzed image reported in
mail list should no longer cause kernel panic.
Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points:
1) Restrict sector/node size check
   Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2.
   So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now.

2) Super flag check
   For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and
   btrfs-progs super flags.
   And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this
   check will only output warning.

3) Better root alignment check
   Now root bytenr is checked against sector size.

4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid().
   Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check.
   And magic number check.
Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed
iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace:

[  886.399989] =============================================
[  886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted
[  886.402384] ---------------------------------------------
[  886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] but task is already holding lock:
[  886.403568]  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] other info that might help us debug this:
[  886.403568]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]        CPU0
[  886.403568]        ----
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]   lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem);
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277:
[  886.403568]  #0:  (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[  886.403568]  #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.403568]  #2:  (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.403568]
[  886.403568] stack backtrace:
[  886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[  886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0
[  886.403568]  ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290
[  886.403568]  0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804
[  886.403568] Call Trace:
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[  886.403568]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[  886.489542]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.854348]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.863227] fio        D ffff880213f9bb28     0  8244   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.868719]  ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240
[ 1081.872499]  ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400
[ 1081.876834]  ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.880782] Call Trace:
[ 1081.881793]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.883340]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.895525]  [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab
[ 1081.897419]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.899251]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1081.901063]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1081.902365]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1081.903846]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.906078]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1081.908846]  [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c
[ 1081.910409]  [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs]
[ 1081.912482]  [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs]
[ 1081.914597]  [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs]
[ 1081.919037]  [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128
[ 1081.920754]  [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs]
[ 1081.922496]  [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50
[ 1081.923922]  [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5
[ 1081.925275]  [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4
[ 1081.926584]  [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e
[ 1081.927968]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[ 1081.987434]       Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1
[ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[ 1081.990147] fio        D ffff880218febbb8     0  8249   8240 0x00000000
[ 1081.991626]  ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240
[ 1081.993258]  ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00
[ 1081.994850]  ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4
[ 1081.996485] Call Trace:
[ 1081.997037]  [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97
[ 1081.998017]  [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325
[ 1081.999241]  [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76
[ 1082.000306]  [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.001533]  [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20
[ 1082.002776]  [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21
[ 1082.003995]  [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57
[ 1082.005000]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.007403]  [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs]
[ 1082.008988]  [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs]
[ 1082.010193]  [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77
[ 1082.011280]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.012265]  [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[ 1082.013021]  [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[ 1082.013738]  [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[ 1082.014778]  [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea
[ 1082.015778]  [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[ 1082.016806]  [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[ 1082.017789]  [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[ 1082.018706]  [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore
fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy
a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing
a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the
delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling
an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction
and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more
delayed iput operations.
This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a
semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep
class for each level of recursion.

Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that
is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs
instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are
run from anywhere.

Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org   # 4.1+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance"
(already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users:
metatdata -> metadata.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5

Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5

duplicate const is redundant so remove it
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

I managed to trigger this:
| INFO: trying to register non-static key.
| the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
| turning off the locking correctness validator.
| CPU: 1 PID: 781 Comm: systemd-gpt-aut Not tainted 4.4.0-rt2+ #14
| Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
| [<80307cec>] (dump_stack)
| [<80070e98>] (__lock_acquire)
| [<8007184c>] (lock_acquire)
| [<80287800>] (btrfs_ioctl)
| [<8012a8d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl)
| [<8012ac14>] (SyS_ioctl)

so I think that btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is not invoked behind
a macro somewhere.

Fixes: 7cc8e58d ("Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we return 1 here, then the caller treats it as an error and returns
-EINVAL.  It causes a static checker warning to treat positive returns
as an error.

Fixes: 1aba86d6 ('Btrfs: fix easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case')
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Fix the following error:

fs/btrfs/backref.c:565:1-20: iterator with update on line 577

Fixes: a7ca4225('btrfs: use list_for_each_entry* in backref.c')
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The compression message might not be correctly output.
Fix it.

[[before fix]]

# mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  996.874264] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
[  996.874268] BTRFS: has skinny extents
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3
[ 1035.075017] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression
[ 1035.075021] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[ 1053.679092] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

[[after fix]]

# mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  401.021753] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression
[  401.021758] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
[  401.021760] BTRFS: has skinny extents
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  439.824624] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression
[  439.824629] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)

# mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3
[  459.918430] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression
[  459.918434] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled
# mount | grep /test3
/dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/)
Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop,

[  158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea()
[  158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[  158.664774] Modules linked in:
[  158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2
[  158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
[  158.667392]  ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930
[  158.668515]  ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000
[  158.669647]  ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980
[  158.670769] Call Trace:
[  158.671153]  [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c
[  158.671884]  [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0
[  158.672769]  [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50
[  158.673620]  [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea
[  158.674440]  [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520
[  158.675376]  [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50
[  158.676235]  [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180
[  158.677268]  [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70
[  158.678183]  [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90
[  158.678975]  [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300
[  158.679751]  [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170
[  158.680599]  [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70
[  158.681686]  [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0
[  158.682581]  [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490
[  158.683399]  [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60
[  158.684297]  [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80
[  158.685051]  [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a
[  158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]---
[  158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry
[  158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly
[  158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
[  158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed
[  158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30

This occurs because,

Mount filesystem
Create subvol with ID 257
Unmount filesystem
Mount filesystem
Delete subvol with ID 257
  btrfs_drop_snapshot()
    Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into
    btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list
Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol())
  257 is returned as the next free objectid
  btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name()
    Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257
    in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix.
    Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0.

To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's
highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk.
Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>