- 20 Jan, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Enhance btrfs_check_super_valid() function by the following points: 1) Restrict sector/node size check Not the old max/min valid check, but also check if it's a power of 2. So some bogus number like 12K node size won't pass now. 2) Super flag check For now, there is still some inconsistency between kernel and btrfs-progs super flags. And considering btrfs-progs may add new flags for super block, this check will only output warning. 3) Better root alignment check Now root bytenr is checked against sector size. 4) Move some check into btrfs_check_super_valid(). Like node size vs leaf size check, and PAGESIZE vs sectorsize check. And magic number check. Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
While running a stress test I ran into a deadlock when running the delayed iputs at transaction time, which produced the following report and trace: [ 886.399989] ============================================= [ 886.400871] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 886.401663] 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 Not tainted [ 886.402384] --------------------------------------------- [ 886.403182] fio/8277 is trying to acquire lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] but task is already holding lock: [ 886.403568] (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] other info that might help us debug this: [ 886.403568] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] CPU0 [ 886.403568] ---- [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] lock(&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem); [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] 3 locks held by fio/8277: [ 886.403568] #0: (sb_writers#11){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff81174c4c>] __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 886.403568] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa054620d>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x73/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.403568] #2: (&fs_info->delayed_iput_sem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.403568] [ 886.403568] stack backtrace: [ 886.403568] CPU: 6 PID: 8277 Comm: fio Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 886.403568] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffff88009f80f770 ffffffff8125d4fd ffffffff82af1fc0 [ 886.403568] ffff88009f80f830 ffffffff8108e5f9 0000000200000000 ffff88009fd92290 [ 886.403568] 0000000000000000 ffffffff82af1fc0 ffffffff829cfb01 00042b216d008804 [ 886.403568] Call Trace: [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8125d4fd>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108e5f9>] __lock_acquire+0xd42/0xf0b [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff810c22db>] ? __module_address+0xdf/0x108 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffff8108eb77>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194 [ 886.403568] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8148556b>] down_read+0x3e/0x4d [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] ? btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0538823>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x36/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521d7a>] flush_space+0x435/0x44a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052218b>] ? reserve_metadata_bytes+0x26a/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05221ae>] reserve_metadata_bytes+0x28d/0x384 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa052256c>] ? btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x58/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0522584>] btrfs_block_rsv_refill+0x70/0x96 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053d747>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x394/0x55a [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81188e31>] evict+0xa7/0x15c [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81189878>] iput+0x1d3/0x266 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053887c>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x8f/0xbf [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0533953>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x8f5/0x96e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81085096>] ? signal_pending_state+0x31/0x31 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521191>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1d7/0x288 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 886.489542] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.852335] INFO: task fio:8244 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.854348] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.857560] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.863227] fio D ffff880213f9bb28 0 8244 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.868719] ffff880213f9bb28 00ffffff810fc6b0 ffffffff0000000a ffff88023ed55240 [ 1081.872499] ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9c000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff880206b5d400 [ 1081.876834] ffffffff00000001 ffff880206b5d400 ffff880213f9bb40 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.880782] Call Trace: [ 1081.881793] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.883340] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.895525] [<ffffffff8108d48d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x1ab [ 1081.897419] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.899251] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1081.901063] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1081.902365] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1081.903846] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.906078] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1081.908846] [<ffffffff8108d461>] ? mark_held_locks+0x56/0x6c [ 1081.910409] [<ffffffffa0521282>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x40/0x59 [btrfs] [ 1081.912482] [<ffffffffa05228f5>] btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space+0x1e/0x4e [btrfs] [ 1081.914597] [<ffffffffa053620a>] btrfs_direct_IO+0x10c/0x27e [btrfs] [ 1081.919037] [<ffffffff8111d9a1>] generic_file_direct_write+0xb3/0x128 [ 1081.920754] [<ffffffffa05463c3>] btrfs_file_write_iter+0x229/0x408 [btrfs] [ 1081.922496] [<ffffffff8108ae38>] ? __lock_is_held+0x38/0x50 [ 1081.923922] [<ffffffff8117279e>] __vfs_write+0x7c/0xa5 [ 1081.925275] [<ffffffff81172cda>] vfs_write+0xa0/0xe4 [ 1081.926584] [<ffffffff811734cc>] SyS_write+0x50/0x7e [ 1081.927968] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f [ 1081.985293] INFO: lockdep is turned off. [ 1081.986132] INFO: task fio:8249 blocked for more than 120 seconds. [ 1081.987434] Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-18+ #1 [ 1081.988534] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. [ 1081.990147] fio D ffff880218febbb8 0 8249 8240 0x00000000 [ 1081.991626] ffff880218febbb8 00ffffff81486b8e ffff88020000000b ffff88023ed75240 [ 1081.993258] ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218fec000 ffff88020a4d5318 ffff8802120a9a00 [ 1081.994850] ffffffff00000001 ffff8802120a9a00 ffff880218febbd0 ffffffff81482ba4 [ 1081.996485] Call Trace: [ 1081.997037] [<ffffffff81482ba4>] schedule+0x7f/0x97 [ 1081.998017] [<ffffffff81485eb5>] rwsem_down_write_failed+0x2d5/0x325 [ 1081.999241] [<ffffffff810852a5>] ? finish_wait+0x6d/0x76 [ 1082.000306] [<ffffffff81269723>] call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.001533] [<ffffffff81269723>] ? call_rwsem_down_write_failed+0x13/0x20 [ 1082.002776] [<ffffffff81089fae>] ? __down_write_nested.isra.0+0x1f/0x21 [ 1082.003995] [<ffffffff814855bd>] down_write+0x43/0x57 [ 1082.005000] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] ? btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.007403] [<ffffffffa05211b0>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x1f6/0x288 [btrfs] [ 1082.008988] [<ffffffffa0545064>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c1/0xc2f [btrfs] [ 1082.010193] [<ffffffff8108a1ba>] ? percpu_down_read+0x4e/0x77 [ 1082.011280] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.012265] [<ffffffff81174c4c>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0 [ 1082.013021] [<ffffffff811712e4>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff [ 1082.013738] [<ffffffff81181ebb>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b [ 1082.014778] [<ffffffff811822d7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x40a/0x4ea [ 1082.015778] [<ffffffff81176ea7>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e [ 1082.016806] [<ffffffff8118b4de>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71 [ 1082.017789] [<ffffffff8118240e>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [ 1082.018706] [<ffffffff814872d7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f This happens because we can recursively acquire the semaphore fs_info->delayed_iput_sem when attempting to allocate space to satisfy a file write request as shown in the first trace above - when committing a transaction we acquire (down_read) the semaphore before running the delayed iputs, and when running a delayed iput() we can end up calling an inode's eviction handler, which in turn commits another transaction and attempts to acquire (down_read) again the semaphore to run more delayed iput operations. This results in a deadlock because if a task acquires multiple times a semaphore it should invoke down_read_nested() with a different lockdep class for each level of recursion. Fix this by simplifying the implementation and use a mutex instead that is acquired by the cleaner kthread before it runs the delayed iputs instead of always acquiring a semaphore before delayed references are run from anywhere. Fixes: d7c15171 (btrfs: Fix NO_SPACE bug caused by delayed-iput) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
The recent change titled "Btrfs: Check metadata redundancy on balance" (already in linux-next) left a typo in a message for users: metatdata -> metadata. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
-
- 19 Jan, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Colin Ian King authored
duplicate const is redundant so remove it Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 15 Jan, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
I managed to trigger this: | INFO: trying to register non-static key. | the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. | turning off the locking correctness validator. | CPU: 1 PID: 781 Comm: systemd-gpt-aut Not tainted 4.4.0-rt2+ #14 | Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express | [<80307cec>] (dump_stack) | [<80070e98>] (__lock_acquire) | [<8007184c>] (lock_acquire) | [<80287800>] (btrfs_ioctl) | [<8012a8d4>] (do_vfs_ioctl) | [<8012ac14>] (SyS_ioctl) so I think that btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is not invoked behind a macro somewhere. Fixes: 7cc8e58d ("Btrfs: fix unprotected device's variants on 32bits machine") Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Dan Carpenter authored
If we return 1 here, then the caller treats it as an error and returns -EINVAL. It causes a static checker warning to treat positive returns as an error. Fixes: 1aba86d6 ('Btrfs: fix easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case') Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Geliang Tang authored
Fix the following error: fs/btrfs/backref.c:565:1-20: iterator with update on line 577 Fixes: a7ca4225('btrfs: use list_for_each_entry* in backref.c') Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
The compression message might not be correctly output. Fix it. [[before fix]] # mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 996.874264] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled [ 996.874268] BTRFS: has skinny extents # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) # mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 1035.075017] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression [ 1035.075021] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) # mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 1053.679092] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) [[after fix]] # mount -o compress /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 401.021753] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression [ 401.021758] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled [ 401.021760] BTRFS: has skinny extents # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) # mount -o remount,compress-force /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 439.824624] BTRFS info (device sdb3): force zlib compression [ 439.824629] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress-force=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) # mount -o remount,compress /dev/sdb3 /test3 [ 459.918430] BTRFS info (device sdb3): use zlib compression [ 459.918434] BTRFS info (device sdb3): disk space caching is enabled # mount | grep /test3 /dev/sdb3 on /test3 type btrfs (rw,relatime,compress=zlib,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/) Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Chandan Rajendra authored
The following call trace is seen when btrfs/031 test is executed in a loop, [ 158.661848] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 158.662634] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 890 at /home/chandan/repos/linux/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:558 create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea() [ 158.664102] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2) [ 158.664774] Modules linked in: [ 158.665266] CPU: 2 PID: 890 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 4.4.0-rc6-g511711af #2 [ 158.666251] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 158.667392] ffffffff81c0a6b0 ffff8806c7c4f8e8 ffffffff81431fc8 ffff8806c7c4f930 [ 158.668515] ffff8806c7c4f920 ffffffff81051aa1 ffff880c85aff000 ffff8800bb44d000 [ 158.669647] ffff8808863b5c98 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe ffff8806c7c4f980 [ 158.670769] Call Trace: [ 158.671153] [<ffffffff81431fc8>] dump_stack+0x44/0x5c [ 158.671884] [<ffffffff81051aa1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xc0 [ 158.672769] [<ffffffff81051b27>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x47/0x50 [ 158.673620] [<ffffffff813bc98d>] create_subvol+0x3d1/0x6ea [ 158.674440] [<ffffffff813777c9>] btrfs_mksubvol.isra.30+0x369/0x520 [ 158.675376] [<ffffffff8108a4aa>] ? percpu_down_read+0x1a/0x50 [ 158.676235] [<ffffffff81377a81>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_transid+0x101/0x180 [ 158.677268] [<ffffffff81377b52>] btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x52/0x70 [ 158.678183] [<ffffffff8137afb4>] btrfs_ioctl+0x474/0x2f90 [ 158.678975] [<ffffffff81144b8e>] ? vma_merge+0xee/0x300 [ 158.679751] [<ffffffff8115be31>] ? alloc_pages_vma+0x91/0x170 [ 158.680599] [<ffffffff81123f62>] ? lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable+0x22/0x70 [ 158.681686] [<ffffffff813d99cf>] ? selinux_file_ioctl+0xff/0x1d0 [ 158.682581] [<ffffffff8117b791>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x2c1/0x490 [ 158.683399] [<ffffffff813d3cde>] ? security_file_ioctl+0x3e/0x60 [ 158.684297] [<ffffffff8117b9d4>] SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x80 [ 158.685051] [<ffffffff819b2bd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6a [ 158.685958] ---[ end trace 4b63312de5a2cb76 ]--- [ 158.686647] BTRFS: error (device loop0) in create_subvol:558: errno=-2 No such entry [ 158.709508] BTRFS info (device loop0): forced readonly [ 158.737113] BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled [ 158.738096] BTRFS error (device loop0): Remounting read-write after error is not allowed [ 158.851303] BTRFS error (device loop0): cleaner transaction attach returned -30 This occurs because, Mount filesystem Create subvol with ID 257 Unmount filesystem Mount filesystem Delete subvol with ID 257 btrfs_drop_snapshot() Add root corresponding to subvol 257 into btrfs_transaction->dropped_roots list Create new subvol (i.e. create_subvol()) 257 is returned as the next free objectid btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name() Finds the btrfs_root instance corresponding to the old subvol with ID 257 in btrfs_fs_info->fs_roots_radix. Returns error since btrfs_root_item->refs has the value of 0. To fix the issue the commit initializes tree root's and subvolume root's highest_objectid when loading the roots from disk. Signed-off-by: Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
Overloading extent_map->bdev to struct map_lookup * might have started out as a means to an end, but it's a pattern that's used all over the place now. Let's get rid of the casting and just add a union instead. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 Jan, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'for-chris-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fdmanana/linux into for-linus-4.5 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'misc-cleanups-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5 Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'misc-for-4.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux into for-linus-4.5
-
- 07 Jan, 2016 25 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
As of the 4.3 kernel release, the fitrim ioctl can now discard any region of a disk that is not allocated to any chunk/block group, including the first megabyte which is used for our primary superblock and by the boot loader (grub for example). Fix this by not allowing to trim/discard any region in the device starting with an offset not greater than min(alloc_start_mount_option, 1Mb), just as it was not possible before 4.3. A reproducer test case for xfstests follows. seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { cd / rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch rm -f $seqres.full _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 # Write to the [0, 64Kb[ and [68Kb, 1Mb[ ranges of the device. These ranges are # reserved for a boot loader to use (GRUB for example) and btrfs should never # use them - neither for allocating metadata/data nor should trim/discard them. # The range [64Kb, 68Kb[ is used for the primary superblock of the filesystem. $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 0 64K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xfd 68K 956K" $SCRATCH_DEV | _filter_xfs_io # Now mount the filesystem and perform a fitrim against it. _scratch_mount _require_batched_discard $SCRATCH_MNT $FSTRIM_PROG $SCRATCH_MNT # Now unmount the filesystem and verify the content of the ranges was not # modified (no trim/discard happened on them). _scratch_unmount echo "Content of the ranges [0, 64Kb] and [68Kb, 1Mb[ after fitrim:" od -t x1 -N $((64 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV od -t x1 -j $((68 * 1024)) -N $((956 * 1024)) $SCRATCH_DEV status=0 exit Reported-by: Vincent Petry <PVince81@yahoo.fr> Reported-by: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109341 Fixes: 499f377f (btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.3+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
Sam Tygier authored
When converting a filesystem via balance check that metadata mode is at least as redundant as the data mode. For example give warning when: -dconvert=raid1 -mconvert=single Signed-off-by: Sam Tygier <samtygier@yahoo.co.uk> [ minor message reformatting ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
There is one ENOSPC case that's very confusing. There's Available greater than zero but no file operation succeds (besides removing files). This happens when the metadata are exhausted and there's no possibility to allocate another chunk. In this scenario it's normal that there's still some space in the data chunk and the calculation in df reflects that in the Avail value. To at least give some clue about the ENOSPC situation, let statfs report zero value in Avail, even if there's still data space available. Current: /dev/sdb1 4.0G 3.3G 719M 83% /mnt/test New: /dev/sdb1 4.0G 3.3G 0 100% /mnt/test We calculate the remaining metadata space minus global reserve. If this is (supposedly) smaller than zero, there's no space. But this does not hold in practice, the exhausted state happens where's still some positive delta. So we apply some guesswork and compare the delta to a 4M threshold. (Practically observed delta was 2M.) We probably cannot calculate the exact threshold value because this depends on the internal reservations requested by various operations, so some operations that consume a few metadata will succeed even if the Avail is zero. But this is better than the other way around. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
We can also preallocate btrfs_path that's used during pending snapshot creation and avoid another late ENOMEM failure. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The actual snapshot creation is delayed until transaction commit. If we cannot get enough memory for the root item there, we have to fail the whole transaction commit which is bad. So we'll allocate the memory at the ioctl call and pass it along with the pending_snapshot struct. The potential ENOMEM will be returned to the caller of snapshot ioctl. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
We can allocate pending_snapshot earlier and do not have to do cleanup in case of failure. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The values of btrfs_path::locks are 0 to 4, fit into a u8. Let's see: * overall size of btrfs_path drops down from 136 to 112 (-24 bytes), * better packing in a slab page +6 objects * the whole structure now fits to 2 cachelines * slight decrease in code size: text data bss dec hex filename 938731 43670 23144 1005545 f57e9 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.before 938203 43670 23144 1005017 f55d9 fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko.after (and the generated assembly does not change much) The main purpose is to decrease the size of the structure without affecting performance. The byte access is usually well behaving accross arches, the locks are not accessed frequently and sometimes just compared to zero. Note for further size reduction attempts: the slots could be made u16 but this might generate worse code on some arches (non-byte and non-int access). Also the range of operations on slots is wider compared to locks and the potential performance drop should be evaluated first. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The level is 0..7, we can use smaller type. The size of btrfs_path is now 136 bytes from 144, which is +2 objects that fit into a 4k slab. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The possible values for reada are all positive and bounded, we can later save some bytes by storing it in u8. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Replace the integers by enums for better readability. The value 2 does not have any meaning since a7175319 "Btrfs: do less aggressive btree readahead" (2009-01-22). Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
There are a few statically initialized arrays that can be made const. The remaining (like file_system_type, sysfs attributes or prop handlers) do not allow that due to type mismatch when passed to the APIs or because the structures are modified through other members. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
* struct extent_io_ops * struct btrfs_free_space_op Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Preparatory work for making btrfs_free_space_op constant. In test_steal_space_from_bitmap_to_extent, we substitute use_bitmap with own version thus preventing constification. We can rework it so we replace the whole structure with the correct function pointers. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Geliang Tang authored
Use list_for_each_entry*() to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Geliang Tang authored
Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of list_for_each_safe() to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Geliang Tang authored
Use list_for_each_entry*() instead of list_for_each*() to simplify the code. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Byongho Lee authored
We use many constants to represent size and offset value. And to make code readable we use '256 * 1024 * 1024' instead of '268435456' to represent '256MB'. However we can make far more readable with 'SZ_256MB' which is defined in the 'linux/sizes.h'. So this patch replaces 'xxx * 1024 * 1024' kind of expression with single 'SZ_xxxMB' if 'xxx' is a power of 2 then 'xxx * SZ_1M' if 'xxx' is not a power of 2. And I haven't touched to '4096' & '8192' because it's more intuitive than 'SZ_4KB' & 'SZ_8KB'. Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Alexandru Moise authored
It's slightly cleaner to zero-out the delayed node upon allocation than to do it by hand in btrfs_init_delayed_node() for a few members Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Alexandru Moise authored
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Alexandru Moise authored
Conform to __btrfs_fs_incompat() cast-to-bool (!!) by explicitly returning boolean not int. Signed-off-by: Alexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Byongho Lee authored
The inode argument is never used from the beginning, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Byongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Although we prefer to use separate caches for various structs, it seems better not to do that for struct btrfs_delalloc_work. Objects of this type are allocated rarely, when transaction commit calls btrfs_start_delalloc_roots, requesting delayed iputs. The objects are temporary (with some IO involved) but still allocated and freed within __start_delalloc_inodes. Memory allocation failure is handled. The slab cache is empty most of the time (observed on several systems), so if we need to allocate a new slab object, the first one has to allocate a full page. In a potential case of low memory conditions this might fail with higher probability compared to using the generic slab caches. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
The helper btrfs_alloc_workqueue will add the "btrfs-" prefix. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-