- 26 Jul, 2019 40 commits
-
-
Pascal van Leeuwen authored
This patch recognises the fact that the hardware cannot ever process more than 2,199,023,386,111 bytes of hash or HMAC payload, so there is no point in maintaining 128 bit wide byte counters, 64 bits is more than sufficient Signed-off-by:
Pascal van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@verimatrix.com> Signed-off-by:
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
-
Pascal van Leeuwen authored
This patch adds support for the following AEAD ciphersuites: - authenc(hmac(sha1),rfc3686(ctr(aes))) - authenc(hmac(sha224),rfc3686(ctr(aes))) - authenc(hmac(sha256),rfc3686(ctr(aes))) - authenc(hmac(sha384),rfc3686(ctr(aes))) - authenc(hmac(sha512),rfc3686(ctr(aes))) Signed-off-by:
-
Pascal van Leeuwen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Pascal van Leeuwen authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored
For spinlocks the type spinlock_t should be used instead of "struct spinlock". Use spinlock_t for spinlock's definition. Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Fuqian Huang authored
kmemdup is introduced to duplicate a region of memory in a neat way. Rather than kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy, which the programmer needs to write the size twice (sometimes lead to mistakes), kmemdup improves readability, leads to smaller code and also reduce the chances of mistakes. Suggestion to use kmemdup rather than using kmalloc/kzalloc + memcpy. Signed-off-by:
Fuqian Huang <huangfq.daxian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com> Acked-by:
Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Reviewed-by:
Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Provide an accelerated implementation of aegis128 by wiring up the SIMD hooks in the generic driver to an implementation based on NEON intrinsics, which can be compiled to both ARM and arm64 code. This results in a performance of 2.2 cycles per byte on Cortex-A53, which is a performance increase of ~11x compared to the generic code. Reviewed-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Add some plumbing to allow the AEGIS128 code to be built with SIMD routines for acceleration. Reviewed-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The generic AES code provides four sets of lookup tables, where each set consists of four tables containing the same 32-bit values, but rotated by 0, 8, 16 and 24 bits, respectively. This makes sense for CISC architectures such as x86 which support memory operands, but for other architectures, the rotates are quite cheap, and using all four tables needlessly thrashes the D-cache, and actually hurts rather than helps performance. Since x86 already has its own implementation of AEGIS based on AES-NI instructions, let's tweak the generic implementation towards other architectures, and avoid the prerotated tables, and perform the rotations inline. On ARM Cortex-A53, this results in a ~8% speedup. Acked-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
TFM init/exit routines are optional, so no need to provide empty ones. Reviewed-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Three variants of AEGIS were proposed for the CAESAR competition, and only one was selected for the final portfolio: AEGIS128. The other variants, AEGIS128L and AEGIS256, are not likely to ever turn up in networking protocols or other places where interoperability between Linux and other systems is a concern, nor are they likely to be subjected to further cryptanalysis. However, uninformed users may think that AEGIS128L (which is faster) is equally fit for use. So let's remove them now, before anyone starts using them and we are forced to support them forever. Note that there are no known flaws in the algorithms or in any of these implementations, but they have simply outlived their usefulness. Reviewed-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
MORUS was not selected as a winner in the CAESAR competition, which is not surprising since it is considered to be cryptographically broken [0]. (Note that this is not an implementation defect, but a flaw in the underlying algorithm). Since it is unlikely to be in use currently, let's remove it before we're stuck with it. [0] https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/172.pdfReviewed-by:
-
Hannah Pan authored
Add self-tests for the lzo-rle algorithm. Signed-off-by:
Hannah Pan <hannahpan@google.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The scalar table based AES routines are not used by other drivers, so let's keep it that way and unexport the symbols. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
There are a few copies of the AES S-boxes floating around, so export the ones from the AES library so that we can reuse them in other modules. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The versions of the AES lookup tables that are only used during the last round are never used outside of the driver, so there is no need to export their symbols. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Replace a couple of occurrences where the "aes-generic" cipher is instantiated explicitly and only used for encryption of a single block. Use AES library calls instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Use the AES library instead of the cipher interface to perform the single block of AES processing involved in updating the key of the cmac(aes) hash. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The AMCC code for GCM key derivation allocates a AES cipher to perform a single block encryption. So let's switch to the new and more lightweight AES library instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The bluetooth code uses a bare AES cipher for the encryption operations. Given that it carries out a set_key() operation right before every encryption operation, this is clearly not a hot path, and so the use of the cipher interface (which provides the best implementation available on the system) is not really required. In fact, when using a cipher like AES-NI or AES-CE, both the set_key() and the encrypt() operations involve en/disabling preemption as well as stacking and unstacking the SIMD context, and this is most certainly not worth it for encrypting 16 bytes of data. So let's switch to the new lightweight library interface instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
GHASH is used by the GCM mode, which is often used in contexts where only synchronous ciphers are permitted. So provide a synchronous version of GHASH based on the existing code. This requires a non-SIMD fallback to deal with invocations occurring from a context where SIMD instructions may not be used. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
AES in CTR mode is used by modes such as GCM and CCM, which are often used in contexts where only synchronous ciphers are permitted. So provide a synchronous version of ctr(aes) based on the existing code. This requires a non-SIMD fallback to deal with invocations occurring from a context where SIMD instructions may not be used. We have a helper for this now in the AES library, so wire that up. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
AES in CTR mode is used by modes such as GCM and CCM, which are often used in contexts where only synchronous ciphers are permitted. So provide a synchronous version of ctr(aes) based on the existing code. This requires a non-SIMD fallback to deal with invocations occurring from a context where SIMD instructions may not be used. We have a helper for this now in the AES library, so wire that up. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Align ARM's hw instruction based AES implementation with other versions that keep the key schedule in native endianness. This will allow us to merge the various implementations going forward. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Instead of calling into the table based scalar AES code in situations where the SIMD unit may not be used, use the generic AES code, which is more appropriate since it is less likely to be susceptible to timing attacks. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
In preparation of duplicating the sync ctr(aes) functionality to modules under arch/arm, move the helper function from a inline .h file to the AES library, which is already depended upon by the drivers that use this fallback. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Add a static inline helper modeled after crypto_cbc_encrypt_walk() that can be reused for SIMD algorithms that need to implement a non-SIMD fallback for performing CTR encryption. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Drop aes-generic's version of crypto_aes_expand_key(), and switch to the key expansion routine provided by the AES library. AES key expansion is not performance critical, and it is better to have a single version shared by all AES implementations. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. While at it, remove some references to the table based arm64 version of AES and replace them with AES library calls as well. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The CCM code calls directly into the scalar table based AES cipher for arm64 from the fallback path, and since this implementation is known to be non-time invariant, doing so from a time invariant SIMD cipher is a bit nasty. So let's switch to the AES library - this makes the code more robust, and drops the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing us to omit it entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
The GHASH code uses the generic AES key expansion routines, and calls directly into the scalar table based AES cipher for arm64 from the fallback path, and since this implementation is known to be non-time invariant, doing so from a time invariant SIMD cipher is a bit nasty. So let's switch to the AES library - this makes the code more robust, and drops the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing us to omit it entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
Ard Biesheuvel authored
Switch to the new AES library that also provides an implementation of the AES key expansion routine. This removes the dependency on the generic AES cipher, allowing it to be omitted entirely in the future. Signed-off-by:
-
