- 11 Nov, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Ben Zhang authored
The firmware rt5677_elf_vad is an ELF binary obtained from request_firmware(). Sections of the ELF are loaded to the DSP via SPI. A model (e.g. en_us.mmap) can optionally be loaded to the DSP at RT5677_MODEL_ADDR to overwrite the baked-in model in rt5677_elf_vad. Then we switch to DSP mode, load firmware, and let DSP run. When a hotword is detected, an interrupt is fired and rt5677_irq() is called. When 'DSP VAD Switch' is turned off, the codec is set back to normal mode. The kcontrol 'DSP VAD Switch' is automatically enabled/disabled when the hotwording PCM stream is opened/closed. Signed-off-by:
Ben Zhang <benzh@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191106011335.223061-2-cujomalainey@chromium.orgSigned-off-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
-
Shengjiu Wang authored
Audmix support two substream, When two substream start to run, the trigger function may be called by two substream in same time, that the priv->tdms may be updated wrongly. The expected priv->tdms is 0x3, but sometimes the result is 0x2, or 0x1. Fixes: be1df61c ("ASoC: fsl: Add Audio Mixer CPU DAI driver") Signed-off-by:
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Acked-by:
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1e706afe53fdd1fbbbc79277c48a98f8416ba873.1573458378.git.shengjiu.wang@nxp.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 08 Nov, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Keyon Jie authored
Set L1SEN to make sure the system can enter S0ix, and restore it on resume. Signed-off-by:
Keyon Jie <yang.jie@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191101170916.26517-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Keyon Jie authored
Add check to avoid possible NULL pointer dereference issue. This issue was reported by static analysis tools, we didn't face this issue but we can't rule it out either as a false positive. Reported-by:
Keqiao Zhang <keqiao.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Takashi Iwai authored
Paper over a compile warning: sound/soc/soc-pcm.c:1185:8: warning: unused variable ‘name’ Fixes: 0632fa04 ("ASoC: core: Fix pcm code debugfs error") Signed-off-by:
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191107134833.1502-1-tiwai@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
- 07 Nov, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
This patch switches from .txt base to .yaml base Document for FSI. Signed-off-by:
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-by:
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/878sp4jaqy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 06 Nov, 2019 5 commits
-
-
Dragos Tarcatu authored
When using the example SOF amp widget topology, KASAN dumps this when the AMP bytes kcontrol gets loaded: [ 9.579548] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sof_control_load+0x8cc/0xac0 [snd_sof] [ 9.588194] Write of size 40 at addr ffff8882314559dc by task systemd-udevd/2411 Fix that by rejecting the topology if the bytes data size > max_size Fixes: 311ce4fe ("ASoC: SOF: Add support for loading topologies") Reviewed-by:
Jaska Uimonen <jaska.uimonen@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mark Brown authored
Merge branch 'for-5.4' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound into asoc-5.5
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling snd_soc_lookup_component() under mutex_lock(). But, snd_soc_lookup_component() itself is using mutex_lock(), thus it will be dead-lock. This patch adds _nolocked version of it, and avoid dead-lock issue. Fixes: ac6a4dd3("ASoC: soc-core: use snd_soc_lookup_component() at snd_soc_unregister_component()") Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org>" Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
SOF module load/unload tests show nasty recurring warnings: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1339 at sound/core/control.c:466 snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd] RIP: 0010:snd_ctl_remove+0xf0/0x100 [snd] This regression was introduced by the removal of the call to soc_remove_link_components() before soc_card_free() is invoked. Go back to the initial order but only call soc_remove_link_components() once. Reviewed-by:
-
Dragos Tarcatu authored
When using the example SOF amp widget topology, KASAN dumps this when the AMP bytes kcontrol gets loaded: [ 9.579548] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sof_control_load+0x8cc/0xac0 [snd_sof] [ 9.588194] Write of size 40 at addr ffff8882314559dc by task systemd-udevd/2411 Fix that by rejecting the topology if the bytes data size > max_size Fixes: 311ce4fe ("ASoC: SOF: Add support for loading topologies") Reviewed-by:
-
- 05 Nov, 2019 24 commits
-
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_dobj is used only when SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY was selected. Let's enable it under SND_SOC_TOPOLOGY. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
soc-core has some API which is used from topology, but it is doing topology specific operation at soc-core. soc-core should care about core things, and topology should care about topology things, otherwise, it is very confusable. For example topology type is not related to soc-core, it is topology side issue. This patch removes meaningless check from soc-core. This patch keeps extra initialization/destruction at snd_soc_add_dai_link() / snd_soc_remove_dai_link() which were for topology. From this patch, non-topology card can use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. This patch calls snd_soc_register_dai() from snd_soc_register_dais() Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology. But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too. Because of topology side specific reason, it is calling snd_soc_dapm_new_dai_widgets(), but it is not needed _dais() side. This patch factorizes snd_soc_register_dai() to topology / _dais() common part, and topology specific part. And do topology specific part at soc-topology. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
ALSA SoC has 2 functions. snd_soc_register_dai() is used from topology snd_soc_register_dais() is used from snd_soc_add_component() In general, people think like _dai() is called from _dais() with for loop. But in reality, these are very similar but different implementation. We shouldn't have duplicated and confusing implementation. snd_soc_register_dai() is now used from topology. But to reduce duplicated code, it should be used from _dais(), too. To prepare it, this patch adds missing parameter legacy_dai_naming to snd_soc_register_dai(). Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug. This patch adds missing soc_del_dai() and snd_soc_unregister_dai(). Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
This patch moves snd_soc_unregister_dais() next to snd_soc_register_dais(). This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
This patch moves snd_soc_register_dai() next to snd_soc_register_dais(). This is prepare for snd_soc_register_dais() cleanup. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_unregister_component() is now finding component manually, but we already have snd_soc_lookup_component() to find component; Let's use existing function. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
soc-core has snd_soc_add_component(), snd_soc_component_add(), snd_soc_del_component(), snd_soc_component_del(). These are very confusing naming. snd_soc_component_xxx() are called from snd_soc_xxx_component(), and these are very small. Let's merge these into snd_soc_xxx_component(), and remove snd_soc_component_xxx(). Reported-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and is difficult to debug. Now ALSA SoC has snd_soc_add_component(), but there is no paired snd_soc_del_component(). Thus, snd_soc_unregister_component() is calling cleanup function randomly. it is difficult to read. This patch adds missing snd_soc_del_component_unlocked() and balance up code. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_lookup_component() is using mix of continue and break in the same loop. It is odd. This patch cleanup it. Reported-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
This patch moves snd_soc_lookup_component() to upper side. This is prepare for snd_soc_unregister_component() Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
It is easy to read code if it is cleanly using paired function/naming, like start <-> stop, register <-> unregister, etc, etc. But, current ALSA SoC code is very random, unbalance, not paired, etc. It is easy to create bug at the such code, and it will be difficult to debug. ALSA SoC has soc_bind_dai_link(), but its paired soc_unbind_dai_link() is not implemented. More confusable is that soc_remove_pcm_runtimes() which should be soc_unbind_dai_link() is implemented without synchronised to soc_bind_dai_link(). This patch cleanup this unbalance. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
If we focus to soc_bind_dai_link() at snd_soc_instantiate_card(), we will notice very complex operation. static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...) { ... /* * (1) Bind dai_link via card pre-linked dai_link * * Bind dai_link via card pre-linked. * 1 dai_link will be 1 rtd, and connected to card. * for_each_card_prelinks() is for card pre-linked dai_link. * * Image * * card * - rtd(A) * - rtd(A) */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) { ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... /* * (2) Connect card pre-linked dai_link to card list * * Connect all card pre-linked dai_link to *card list*. * Here, (A) means from card pre-linked. * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... */ for_each_card_prelinks(card, i, dai_link) { ret = snd_soc_add_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... /* * (3) Probe binded component * * Each rtd has many components. * Here probes each rtd connected components. * rtd(A) in Image is the probe target. * * During this component probe, topology may add new dai_link to * *card list* by using snd_soc_add_dai_link() which is * used at (2). * Here, (B) means from topology * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... * - dai_link(B) * - dai_link(B) */ ret = soc_probe_link_components(card); ... /* * (4) Bind dai_link again * * Bind dai_link again for topology. * Note, (1) used for_each_card_prelinks(), * here is using for_each_card_links() * * This means from card list. * As Image indicating, it has dai_link(A) (from card pre-link) * and dai_link(B) (from topology). * main target here is dai_link(B). * soc_bind_dai_link() ignores already used * dai_link (= dai_link(A)) * * Image * * card card list * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - rtd(A) - dai_link(A) * - ... - ... * - rtd(B) - dai_link(B) * - rtd(B) - dai_link(B) */ for_each_card_links(card, dai_link) { ret = soc_bind_dai_link(card, dai_link); ... } ... } As you see above, it is doing very complex method. The problem is binding dai_link via "card pre-linked" (= (1)) and "topology added dai_link" (= (3)) are separated. The code can be simple if we can bind dai_link when dai_link is connected to *card list*. This patch do it. Signed-off-by: -
Kuninori Morimoto authored
soc_is_dai_link_bound() check will be called both *before* soc_bind_dai_link() (A), and *under* soc_bind_dai_link() (B). These are very verbose code. Let's remove one of them. * static int soc_bind_dai_link(...) { ... (B) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) { ... return 0; } ... } static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(...) { ... for_each_card_links(...) { (A) if (soc_is_dai_link_bound(...)) continue; * ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); if (ret) goto probe_end; } ... } Signed-off-by: -
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Reported-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
soc_init_dai_link() is needed to be called before soc_bind_dai_link(). int snd_soc_instantiate_card() { for_each_card_prelinks(...) { (1) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...); ... } ... for_each_card_prelinks(...) { (2) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); ... } ... for_each_card_links(...) { ... (A) ret = soc_init_dai_link(...); ... (B) ret = soc_bind_dai_link(...); } ... (1) is for (2), and (A) is for (B) (1) and (2) are for card prelink dai_link. (A) and (B) are for topology added dai_link. soc_init_dai_link() is sanity check for dai_link, not initializing today. Therefore, it is confusable naming. We can rename it as sanity_check. And this check is for soc_bind_dai_link(). It can be more simple code if we can call it from soc_bind_dai_link(). This patch renames it to soc_dai_link_sanity_check(), and call it from soc_bind_dai_link(). Signed-off-by: -
Kuninori Morimoto authored
This patch moves soc_init_dai_link() next to soc_bind_dai_link(). This is prepare for soc_bind_dai_link() cleanup. Signed-off-by:
-
Maxime Ripard authored
The ADAU7118 has an example where the codec has an i2c address of 14, and the unit address set to 14 as well. However, while the address is expressed in decimal, the unit-address is supposed to be in hexadecimal, which ends up with two different addresses that trigger a DTC warning. Fix this by setting the address to 0x14. Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> Fixes: 969d49b2 ("dt-bindings: asoc: Add ADAU7118 documentation") Signed-off-by:
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Acked-by:
-
Ranjani Sridharan authored
Set trigger order for FE DAI links to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST to trigger the BE DAI's before the FE DAI's. This prevents the xruns seen on playback pipelines using the link DMA. Signed-off-by:
-
Ranjani Sridharan authored
Currently, the trigger orders SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE/POST determine the order in which FE DAI and BE DAI are triggered. In the case of SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE, the FE DAI is triggered before the BE DAI and in the case of SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST, the BE DAI is triggered before the FE DAI. And this order remains the same irrespective of the trigger command. In the case of the SOF driver, during playback, the FW expects the BE DAI to be triggered before the FE DAI during the START trigger. The BE DAI trigger handles the starting of Link DMA and so it must be started before the FE DAI is started to prevent xruns during pause/release. This can be addressed by setting the trigger order for the FE dai link to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST. But during the STOP trigger, the FW expects the FE DAI to be triggered before the BE DAI. Retaining the same order during the START and STOP commands, results in FW error as the DAI component in the FW is still active. The issue can be fixed by mirroring the trigger order of FE and BE DAI's during the START and STOP trigger. So, with the trigger order set to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_PRE, the FE DAI will be trigger first during SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START/STOP/RESUME and the BE DAI will be triggered first during the STOP/SUSPEND/PAUSE commands. Conversely, with the trigger order set to SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST, the BE DAI will be triggered first during the SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START/STOP/RESUME commands and the FE DAI will be triggered first during the SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP/SUSPEND/PAUSE commands. Signed-off-by:
-
Yong Zhi authored
Use devm_gpio_request() to automatic unroll when fails and avoid resource leaks at error paths. Signed-off-by:
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1572905399-22402-1-git-send-email-yong.zhi@intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Olivier Moysan authored
Do not support mmap in S/PDIF mode. In S/PDIF mode the buffer has to be copied, to allow the channel status bits insertion. Signed-off-by:
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@st.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191104133654.28750-1-olivier.moysan@st.comSigned-off-by:
-
- 04 Nov, 2019 5 commits
-
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
The wrong dependency is used and the build can be broken Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
Geminilake machine drivers are only tested and recommended with SOF. Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
The same driver is reused for 3 different configurations, but the driver will only be build if ApolloLake is selected. Fix and make sure each device can work without dependencies on others (useful for minimal configurations). Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
This option is only required with the Skylake platform driver, there is no reason to have this option in machine drivers. This is e.g. useless for SOF-based solutions. Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
This option famously broke audio on Linus' laptop and the problem have not been fixed. Mark as DEPRECATED to avoid any ambiguity with distros. Use SOF if you need HDaudio support w/ the DSP enabled, e.g. for DMIC capture. Signed-off-by:
-
