1. 19 Oct, 2011 22 commits
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: set truncate block rsv's size · 4a338542
      Josef Bacik authored
      While debugging a different issue I noticed that we were always reserving space
      when we tried to use our truncate block rsv's.  This is because they didn't have
      a ->size value, so use_block_rsv just assumes there is nothing reserved and it
      does a reserve_metadata_bytes.  This is because btrfs_check_block_rsv() doesn't
      actually add to the size of the block rsv.  That seems to be the right thing to
      do so set ->size to the minimum truncate size we need, since we will always only
      refill to that size anyway, and this way everything works out correctly.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      4a338542
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: don't increase the block_rsv's size when emergency allocating space · 7f701508
      Josef Bacik authored
      If we have to emergency reserve space we need to not increase the block_rsv
      size, otherwise we'll leak space.  Take for instance delalloc, say we reserve
      4k, and we use that 4k, and then we have to emergency allocate another 4k, we
      bump the size up to 8k, however we've only accounted for 4k in reservations in
      all of our supporting logic, so we'll go to free the 4k and end up having a size
      of 4k, which will cause us to later not free as much space.  I saw this doing
      testing where I wasn't reserving enough space for something but was still
      leaking space, very frustrating.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      7f701508
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: fix space leak when we fail to make an allocation · 7ed49f18
      Josef Bacik authored
      When changing back to using a spin_lock to protect the extent counters I decided
      that since we would only be dropping our original extent, it was ok to just drop
      the extent and return.  However since somebody else could have come in and done
      a reservation, we need to do the normal song and dance to clear the reservation
      out properly.  So calculate how much space we need to free, and then subtract
      what we just attempted to reserve.  If it's more then we know we need to drop
      those bytes from the delalloc block rsv.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      7ed49f18
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: fix call to btrfs_search_slot in free space cache · a9b5fcdd
      Josef Bacik authored
      We are setting ins_len to 1 even tho we are just modifying an item that should
      be there already.  This may cause the search stuff to split nodes on the way
      down needelessly.  Set this to 0 since we aren't inserting anything.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      a9b5fcdd
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: allow callers to specify if flushing can occur for btrfs_block_rsv_check · 482e6dc5
      Josef Bacik authored
      If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to
      delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount.  This is because
      btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to
      flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed.  But in truncate and
      evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our
      work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to
      reserve_metadata_bytes.  Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those
      complaints.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      482e6dc5
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: reduce the amount of space needed for truncates · 07127184
      Josef Bacik authored
      With btrfs_truncate_inode_items we always return if we have to go to another
      leaf, which makes us do our reservation again.  This means we will only ever
      modify one leaf at a time, so we only need 1 items worth of slack space.  Also,
      since we are deleting we will not be creating nodes as we go down, if anything
      we'll be free'ing them as we merge them together, so make a different
      calculation for truncate which will only have the worst case useage of COW'ing
      the entire path down to the leaf.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      07127184
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: only reserve space in fallocate if we have to do a preallocate · 1b9c332b
      Josef Bacik authored
      Lukas found a problem where if he tries to fallocate over the same region twice
      and the first fallocate took up all the space we would fail with ENOSPC.  This
      is because we reserve the total space we want to use for fallocate, regardless
      of wether or not we will have to actually preallocate.  So instead move the
      check into the loop where we actually have to do the preallocate.  Thanks,
      Tested-by: default avatarLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      1b9c332b
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: kill btrfs_truncate_reserve_metadata · 5e962c78
      Josef Bacik authored
      Since we've optimized the truncate path, we no longer require this function.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      5e962c78
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: optimize how we account for space in truncate · 907cbceb
      Josef Bacik authored
      Currently we're starting and stopping a transaction for no real reason, so kill
      that and just reserve enough space as if we can truncate all in one transaction.
      Also use btrfs_block_rsv_check() for our reserve to minimize the amount of space
      we may have to allocate for our slack space.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      907cbceb
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: don't try to commit in btrfs_block_rsv_check · 13553e52
      Josef Bacik authored
      We will try and reserve metadata bytes in btrfs_block_rsv_check and if we cannot
      because we have a transaction open it will return EAGAIN, so we do not need to
      try and commit the transaction again.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      13553e52
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: kill unused parts of block_rsv · dabdb640
      Josef Bacik authored
      The priority and refill_used flags are not used anymore, and neither is the
      usage counter, so just remove them from btrfs_block_rsv.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      dabdb640
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: ratelimit the generation printk for the free space cache · 6ab60601
      Josef Bacik authored
      A user reported getting spammed when moving to 3.0 by this message.  Since we
      switched to the normal checksumming infrastructure all old free space caches
      will be wrong and need to be regenerated so people are likely to see this
      message a lot, so ratelimit it so it doesn't fill up their logs and freak them
      out.  Thanks,
      Reported-by: default avatarAndrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      6ab60601
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: fix how we reserve space for deleting inodes · 4289a667
      Josef Bacik authored
      I converted btrfs_truncate to do sane reservations for truncate, but didn't
      convert btrfs_evict_inode.  Basically we need to save the orphan_rsv for
      deleting the orphan item, and do normal reservations for our truncate.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      4289a667
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: kill the durable block rsv stuff · 37be25bc
      Josef Bacik authored
      This is confusing code and isn't used by anything anymore, so delete it.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      37be25bc
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: kill the orphan space calculation for snapshots · dba68306
      Josef Bacik authored
      This patch kills off the calculation for the amount of space needed for the
      orphan operations during a snapshot.  The thing is we only do snapshots on
      commit, so any space that is in the block_rsv->freed[] isn't going to be in the
      new snapshot anyway, so there isn't any reason to require that space to be
      reserved for the snapshot to occur.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      dba68306
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: calculate checksum space correctly · 7709cde3
      Josef Bacik authored
      We have not been reserving enough space for checksums.  We were just reserving
      bytes for the checksum items themselves, we were not taking into account having
      to cow the tree and such.  This patch adds a csum_bytes counter to the inode for
      keeping track of the number of bytes outstanding we have for checksums.  Then we
      calculate how many leaves would be required for the checksums we are given and
      use that to reserve space.  This adds a significant amount of bytes to our
      reservations, but we will handle this later.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      7709cde3
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: skip looking for delalloc if we don't have ->fill_delalloc · 9e487107
      Josef Bacik authored
      We always look for delalloc bytes in our io_tree so we can fill in delalloc.
      This is fine in most cases, but if we're writing out the btree_inode this is
      just a superfluous tree search on the io_tree, and if we have a lot of metadata
      dirty this could be an expensive check.  So instead check to see if our io_tree
      has a ->fill_delalloc op, and if not don't even bother doing the lookup.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      9e487107
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: use bytes_may_use for all ENOSPC reservations · fb25e914
      Josef Bacik authored
      We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong
      since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator.
      This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don't allocate a
      bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was
      actually in use by metadata.
      
      This passes Arne's enospc test and xfstests as well as my own enospc tests.
      Hopefully this will get us moving in the right direction.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      fb25e914
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: fix how we mount subvol=<whatever> · 830c4adb
      Josef Bacik authored
      We've only been able to mount with subvol=<whatever> where whatever was a subvol
      within whatever root we had as the default.  This allows us to mount -o
      subvol=path/to/subvol/you/want relative from the normal fs_tree root.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      830c4adb
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: use d_obtain_alias when mounting subvol/subvolid · ba5b8958
      Josef Bacik authored
      Currently what we do is just wrong.  We either
      
      1) Alloc a new "root" dentry with sb->s_root as it's parent which is just wrong
      as we could walk into this subvol later on via another path and hilarity could
      ensue.  Also we don't check the return value of d_splice_alias which isn't good
      either.
      
      or
      
      2) Do a d_find_alias() which we could have lost our dentry from cache at this
      point and found nothing.
      
      So use d_obtain_alias().  In the case that we already have the inode/dentry in
      cache we will get the correct dentry.  If not we will get a disconnected dentry
      tree so if we walk into it later on everything will be connected up properly.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      ba5b8958
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: kill reserved_bytes in inode · 0cbbdf7c
      Josef Bacik authored
      reserved_bytes is not used for anything in the inode, remove it.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      0cbbdf7c
    • Josef Bacik's avatar
      Btrfs: move stuff around in btrfs_inode to get better packing · f1bdcc0a
      Josef Bacik authored
      Moving things around to give us better packing in the btrfs_inode.  This reduces
      the size of our inode by 8 bytes.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      f1bdcc0a
  2. 05 Oct, 2011 1 commit
  3. 04 Oct, 2011 12 commits
  4. 03 Oct, 2011 5 commits