- 23 Feb, 2012 4 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
If btrfs reads a block and finds a parent transid mismatch, it clears the uptodate flags on the extent buffer, and the pages inside it. But we only clear the uptodate bits in the state tree if the block straddles more than one page. This is from an old optimization from to reduce contention on the extent state tree. But it is buggy because the code that retries a read from a different copy of the block is going to find the uptodate state bits set and skip the IO. The end result of the bug is that we'll never actually read the good copy (if there is one). The fix here is to always clear the uptodate state bits, which is safe because this code is only called when the parent transid fails. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
When we are setting up the mount, we close all the devices that were not actually part of the metadata we found. But, we don't make sure that one of those devices wasn't fs_devices->latest_bdev, which means we can do a use after free on the one we closed. This updates latest_bdev as it goes. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
This allows us to gracefully continue if we aren't able to insert directory items, both for normal files/dirs and snapshots. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 21 Feb, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Liu Bo authored
In clear_extent_bit, it is enough that next node is adjacent in tree level. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
- 16 Feb, 2012 7 commits
-
-
Liu Bo authored
When overcommitting, we should check the sum of pinned space and bytes for delayed item. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
clear_state_bit will do merge_state for us, so kick out the redundant one. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Clearing a range's bits is different with setting them, since we don't need to touch them when states do not contain bits we want. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
This patch corrects error checking of lookup_extent_mapping(). Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Miao Xie authored
When I ran xfstests circularly on a auto-defragment btrfs, the deadlock happened. Steps to reproduce: [tty0] # export MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o autodefrag" # export TEST_DEV=<partition1> # export TEST_DIR=<mountpoint1> # export SCRATCH_DEV=<partition2> # export SCRATCH_MNT=<mountpoint2> # while [ 1 ] > do > ./check 091 127 263 > sleep 1 > done [tty1] # while [ 1 ] > do > echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches > done Several hours later, the test processes will hang on, and the deadlock will happen on page lock. The reason is that: Auto defrag task Flush thread Test task btrfs_writepages() add ordered extent (including page 1, 2) set page 1 writeback set page 2 writeback endio_fn() end page 2 writeback release page 2 lock page 1 alloc and lock page 2 page 2 is not uptodate btrfs_readpage() start ordered extent() btrfs_writepages() try to lock page 1 so deadlock happens. Fix this bug by unlocking the page which is in writeback, and re-locking it after the writeback end. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miax@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
This patch adds the check on the return value of extent_io_ops. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Florian Albrechtskirchinger authored
Set the subvol root inode permissions based on the current umask.
-
- 15 Feb, 2012 9 commits
-
-
David Sterba authored
Raid array setup code creates an extent buffer in an usual way. When the PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is > super block size, the extent pages are not marked up-to-date, which triggers a WARN_ON in the following write_extent_buffer call. Add an explicit up-to-date call to silence the warning. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
David Sterba authored
On ia64, powerpc64 and sparc64 the bitfield is modified through a RMW cycle and current gcc rewrites the adjacent 4B word, which in case of a spinlock or atomic has disaterous effect. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/1/220Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
We encountered an issue that was easily observable on s/390 systems but could really happen anywhere. The timing just seemed to hit reliably on s/390 with limited memory. The gist is that when an unexpected set_page_dirty() happened, we'd run into the BUG() in btrfs_writepage_fixup_worker since it wasn't properly set up for delalloc. This patch does the following: - Performs the missing delalloc in the fixup worker - Allow the start hook to return -EBUSY which informs __extent_writepage that it should mark the page skipped and not to redirty it. This is required since the fixup worker can fail with -ENOSPC and the page will have already been redirtied. That causes an Oops in drop_outstanding_extents later. Retrying the fixup worker could lead to an infinite loop. Deferring the page redirty also saves us some cycles since the page would be stuck in a resubmit-redirty loop until the fixup worker completes. It's not harmful, just wasteful. - If the fixup worker fails, we mark the page and mapping as errored, and end the writeback, similar to what we would do had the page actually been submitted to writeback. Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
load_free_space_cache() has forgotten to free path. Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
Arne Jansen authored
Because scrub enumerates the dev extent tree to find the chunks to scrub, it currently finds each DUP chunk twice and also scrubs it twice. This patch makes sure that scrub_chunk only checks that part of the chunk the dev extent has been found for. This only changes the behaviour for DUP chunks. Reported-and-tested-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
Liu Bo authored
A user reported a bug of btrfs's trim, that is we will trim 0 bytes after a device delete. The reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs disk1 $ mkfs.btrfs disk2 $ mount disk1 /mnt $ fstrim -v /mnt $ btrfs device add disk2 /mnt $ btrfs device del disk1 /mnt $ fstrim -v /mnt This is because after we delete the device, the block group may start from a non-zero place, which will confuse trim to discard nothing. Reported-by: Lutz Euler <lutz.euler@freenet.de> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Jeff Liu authored
Btrfs: return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE inquiry Given that ENXIO only means "offset beyond EOF" for either SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE inquiry in a desired file range, so we should return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed, rather than ENXIO. Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
-
Jan Schmidt authored
inode_ref_info() returns 1 when the element wasn't found and < 0 on error, just like btrfs_search_slot(). In iref_to_path() it's an error when the inode ref can't be found, thus we return ERR_PTR(ret) in that case. In order to avoid ERR_PTR(1), we now set ret to -ENOENT in that case. Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
Keith Mannthey authored
Gracefully fail when trying to mount a BTRFS file system that has a sectorsize smaller than PAGE_SIZE. On PPC it is possible to build a FS while using a 4k PAGE_SIZE kernel then boot into a 64K PAGE_SIZE kernel. Presently open_ctree fails in an endless loop and hangs the machine in this situation. My debugging has show this Sector size < Page size to be a non trivial situation and a graceful exit from the situation would be nice for the time being. Signed-off-by: Keith Mannthey <kmannth@us.ibm.com>
-
- 01 Feb, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
btrfs_fallocate tries to allocate space only if ranges in the file don't already exist. But the enospc checks it does are not allowed with extents locked. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 27 Jan, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Josef fixed btrfs_page_mkwrite to properly release reserved extents if there was an error. But if we fail to get a reservation and we fail to dirty the inode (for ENOSPC reasons), we'll end up trying to release a reservation we never had. This makes sure we only release if we were able to reserve. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 26 Jan, 2012 10 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
If we span a long area in a bitmap we could end up taking a lot of time searching to the next free area if we're searching from the original window_start, so advance window_start in order to make sure we don't do any superficial searching. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
David Sterba authored
btree_releasepage is a callback and can be passed unknown gfp flags and then they may end up in kmem_cache_alloc called from alloc_extent_state, slab allocator will BUG_ON when there is HIGHMEM or DMA32 flag set. This may happen when btrfs is mounted from a loop device, which masks out __GFP_IO flag. The check in try_release_extent_state 3399 if ((mask & GFP_NOFS) == GFP_NOFS) 3400 mask = GFP_NOFS; will not work and passes unfiltered flags further resulting in crash at mm/slab.c:2963 [<000000000024ae4c>] cache_alloc_refill+0x3b4/0x5c8 [<000000000024c810>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x204/0x294 [<00000000001fd3c2>] mempool_alloc+0x52/0x170 [<000003c000ced0b0>] alloc_extent_state+0x40/0xd4 [btrfs] [<000003c000cee5ae>] __clear_extent_bit+0x38a/0x4cc [btrfs] [<000003c000cee78c>] try_release_extent_state+0x9c/0xd4 [btrfs] [<000003c000cc4c66>] btree_releasepage+0x7e/0xd0 [btrfs] [<0000000000210d84>] shrink_page_list+0x6a0/0x724 [<0000000000211394>] shrink_inactive_list+0x230/0x578 [<0000000000211bb8>] shrink_list+0x6c/0x120 [<0000000000211e4e>] shrink_zone+0x1e2/0x228 [<0000000000211f24>] shrink_zones+0x90/0x254 [<0000000000213410>] do_try_to_free_pages+0xac/0x420 [<0000000000213ae0>] try_to_free_pages+0x13c/0x1b0 [<0000000000204e6c>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5b4/0x9a8 [<00000000001fb04a>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x7e/0xe8 Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Miao Xie authored
When we did sysbench test for inline files, enospc error happened easily though there was lots of free disk space which could be allocated for new chunks. Reproduce steps: # mkfs.btrfs -b $((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) <test partition> # mount <test partition> /mnt # ulimit -n 102400 # cd /mnt # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \ > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \ > --file-test-mode=seqwr prepare # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \ > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \ > --file-test-mode=seqwr run <soon later, BUG_ON() was triggered by enospc error> The reason of this bug is: Now, we can reserve space which is larger than the free space in the chunks if we have enough free disk space which can be used for new chunks. By this way, the space allocator should allocate a new chunk by force if there is no free space in the free space cache. But there are two wrong checks which break this operation. One is if (ret == -ENOSPC && num_bytes > min_alloc_size) in btrfs_reserve_extent(), it is wrong, we should try to allocate a new chunk even we fail to allocate free space by minimum allocable size. The other is if (space_info->force_alloc) force = space_info->force_alloc; in do_chunk_alloc(). It makes the allocator ignore CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE If someone sets ->force_alloc to CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED, and makes the enospc error happen. Fix these two wrong checks. Especially the second one, we fix it by changing the value of CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED and CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE, and make CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE greater than CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED since CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE has higher priority. And if the value which is passed in by the caller is greater than ->force_alloc, use the passed value. Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
xfstests 218 complains that btrfs defrags a file partially: After: 1 Write backwards sync, but contiguous - should defrag to 1 extent Before: 10 -After: 1 +After: 2 To fix this, we need to set max_to_defrag count properly. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Stefan Behrens authored
There have been 4 warnings on 32-bit build, they are herewith fixed. Signed-off-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We specifically set window_start in the cluster struct to indicate where the cluster starts in a bitmap, but we've been using min_start to indicate where we're searching from. This is usually the start of the blockgroup, so essentially means we're constantly searching from the start of any bitmap we find, which completely negates all the trouble we go to in order to setup a cluster. So start using window_start to make sure we actually use the area we found. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Mitch Harder authored
A user has encountered a NULL pointer kernel oops in btrfs when encountering media errors. The problem has been identified as an unhandled NULL pointer returned from find_get_page(). This modification simply checks for a NULL page, and returns with an error if found (the extent_range_uptodate() function returns 1 on errors). After testing this patch, the user reported that the error with the NULL pointer oops was solved. However, there is still a remaining problem with a thread becoming stuck in wait_on_page_locked(page) in the read_extent_buffer_pages(...) function in extent_io.c for (i = start_i; i < num_pages; i++) { page = extent_buffer_page(eb, i); wait_on_page_locked(page); if (!PageUptodate(page)) ret = -EIO; } This patch leaves the issue with the locked page yet to be resolved. Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Jan Kara authored
wait_log_commit() and wait_for_writer() were using slightly different conditions for deciding whether they should call schedule() and whether they should continue in the wait loop. Thus it could happen that we busylooped when the first condition was not true while the second one was. That is burning CPU cycles needlessly and is deadly on UP machines... Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have only been checking for min_bytes available in bitmap entries, but we won't successfully setup a bitmap cluster unless it has at least bytes in the bitmap, so in the common case min_bytes is 4k and we want something like 2MB, so if there are a bunch of bitmap entries with less than 2mb's in them, we'll search all them anyway, which is suboptimal. Fix this check. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Jan Schmidt authored
Added initialization with the declaration of ret. It isn't set later on the switch-default branch (which should never be taken). Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 Jan, 2012 7 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
system chunks by default are very small. This makes them slightly larger and also fixes the conditional checks to make sure we don't allocate a billion of them at once. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
I was using i_mutex for this, but we're getting bogus lockdep warnings by doing that and theres no real way to get rid of those, so just stop using i_mutex to protect delalloc metadata reservations and use a delalloc mutex instead. This shouldn't be contended often at all, only if you are writing and mmap writing to the file at the same time. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
We've been seeing warnings coming out of the orphan commit stuff forever from ceph. Turns out it's because we're racing with checking if the orphan block reserve is set, because we clear it outside of the spin_lock. So leave the normal fastpath checks where they are, but take the spin_lock and _recheck_ to make sure we haven't had an orphan block rsv added in the meantime. Then clear the root's orphan block rsv and release the lock. With this patch a user said the warnings went away and they usually showed up pretty soon after he started ceph. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
I used these tracepoints when figuring out what the cluster stuff was doing, so add them to mainline in case we need to profile this stuff again. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
Btrfs_throttle will make us wait if there is a currently committing transaction until we can open new transactions, which is ridiculous since we don't actually start any transactions within the file write path anyway, so all this does is introduce big latencies if we have a sync/fsync heavy workload going on while somebody else is trying to do work. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
If updating the inode gave us an ENOSPC we were just returning in page_mkwrite, which is a problem since we make our reservation right before trying to update the inode, so fix the out label so that we actually free our reservation. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-