- 16 Oct, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Laurent Dufour authored
At boot time, or when doing memory hot-add operations, if the links in sysfs can't be created, the system is still able to run, so just report the error in the kernel log rather than BUG_ON and potentially make system unusable because the callpath can be called with locks held. Since the number of memory blocks managed could be high, the messages are rate limited. As a consequence, link_mem_sections() has no status to report anymore. Signed-off-by:
Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by:
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915094143.79181-4-ldufour@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
David Hildenbrand authored
"mem" in the name already indicates the root, similar to release_mem_region() and devm_request_mem_region(). Make it implicit. The only single caller always passes iomem_resource, other parents are not applicable. Suggested-by:
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's try to merge system ram resources we add, to minimize the number of resources in /proc/iomem. We don't care about the boundaries of individual chunks we added. Signed-off-by:
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com> Cc: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200911103459.10306-9-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Let's try to merge system ram resources we add, to minimize the number of resources in /proc/iomem. We don't care about the boundaries of individual chunks we added. Signed-off-by:
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com> Cc: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200911103459.10306-8-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
virtio-mem adds memory in memory block granularity, to be able to remove it in the same granularity again later, and to grow slowly on demand. This, however, results in quite a lot of resources when adding a lot of memory. Resources are effectively stored in a list-based tree. Having a lot of resources not only wastes memory, it also makes traversing that tree more expensive, and makes /proc/iomem explode in size (e.g., requiring kexec-tools to manually merge resources later when e.g., trying to create a kdump header). Before this patch, we get (/proc/iomem) when hotplugging 2G via virtio-mem on x86-64: [...] 100000000-13fffffff : System RAM 140000000-33fffffff : virtio0 140000000-147ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 148000000-14fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 150000000-157ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 158000000-15fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 160000000-167ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 168000000-16fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 170000000-177ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 178000000-17fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 180000000-187ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 188000000-18fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 190000000-197ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 198000000-19fffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1a0000000-1a7ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1a8000000-1afffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1b0000000-1b7ffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 1b8000000-1bfffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 3280000000-32ffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00 With this patch, we get (/proc/iomem): [...] fffc0000-ffffffff : Reserved 100000000-13fffffff : System RAM 140000000-33fffffff : virtio0 140000000-1bfffffff : System RAM (virtio_mem) 3280000000-32ffffffff : PCI Bus 0000:00 Of course, with more hotplugged memory, it gets worse. When unplugging memory blocks again, try_remove_memory() (via offline_and_remove_memory()) will properly split the resource up again. Signed-off-by:Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Julien Grall <julien@xen.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@gmail.com> Cc: Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Cc: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200911103459.10306-7-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where possible. Let's provide a flag (MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE) to specify that a resource either created within add_memory*() or passed via add_memory_resource() shall be marked mergeable and merged with applicable siblings. To implement that, we need a kernel/resource interface to mark selected System RAM resources mergeable (IORESOURCE_SYSRAM_MERGEABLE) and trigger merging. Note: We really want to merge after the whole operation succeeded, not directly when adding a resource to the resource tree (it would break add_memory_resource() and require splitting resources again when the operation failed - e.g., due to -ENOMEM). Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We soon want to pass flags, e.g., to mark added System RAM resources. mergeable. Prepare for that. This patch is based on a similar patch by Oscar Salvador: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625075227.15193-3-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We soon want to pass flags via a new type to add_memory() and friends. That revealed that we currently don't guard some declarations by CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. While some definitions could be moved to different places, let's keep it minimal for now and use CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG for all functions only compiled with CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG. Wrap sparse_decode_mem_map() into CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG, it's only called from CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG code. While at it, remove allow_online_pfn_range(), which is no longer around, and mhp_notimplemented(), which is unused. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
IORESOURCE_MEM_DRIVER_MANAGED currently uses an unused PnP bit, which is always set to 0 by hardware. This is far from beautiful (and confusing), and the bit only applies to SYSRAM. So let's move it out of the bus-specific (PnP) defined bits. We'll add another SYSRAM specific bit soon. If we ever need more bits for other purposes, we can steal some from "desc", or reshuffle/regroup what we have. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Patch series "selective merging of system ram resources", v4. Some add_memory*() users add memory in small, contiguous memory blocks. Examples include virtio-mem, hyper-v balloon, and the XEN balloon. This can quickly result in a lot of memory resources, whereby the actual resource boundaries are not of interest (e.g., it might be relevant for DIMMs, exposed via /proc/iomem to user space). We really want to merge added resources in this scenario where possible. Resources are effectively stored in a list-based tree. Having a lot of resources not only wastes memory, it also makes traversing that tree more expensive, and makes /proc/iomem explode in size (e.g., requiring kexec-tools to manually merge resources when creating a kdump header. The current kexec-tools resource count limit does not allow for more than ~100GB of memory with a memory block size of 128MB on x86-64). Let's allow to selectively merge system ram resources by specifying a new flag for add_memory*(). Patch #5 contains a /proc/iomem example. Only tested with virtio-mem. This patch (of 8): Let's make sure splitting a resource on memory hotunplug will never fail. This will become more relevant once we merge selected System RAM resources - then, we'll trigger that case more often on memory hotunplug. In general, this function is already unlikely to fail. When we remove memory, we free up quite a lot of metadata (memmap, page tables, memory block device, etc.). The only reason it could really fail would be when injecting allocation errors. All other error cases inside release_mem_region_adjustable() seem to be sanity checks if the function would be abused in different context - let's add WARN_ON_ONCE() in these cases so we can catch them. [natechancellor@gmail.com: fix use of ternary condition in release_mem_region_adjustable] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922060748.2452056-1-natechancellor@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1159Signed-off-by:
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Currently, it can happen that pages are allocated (and freed) via the buddy before we finished basic memory onlining. For example, pages are exposed to the buddy and can be allocated before we actually mark the sections online. Allocated pages could suddenly fail pfn_to_online_page() checks. We had similar issues with pcp handling, when pages are allocated+freed before we reach zone_pcp_update() in online_pages() [1]. Instead, mark all pageblocks MIGRATE_ISOLATE, such that allocations are impossible. Once done with the heavy lifting, use undo_isolate_page_range() to move the pages to the MIGRATE_MOVABLE freelist, marking them ready for allocation. Similar to offline_pages(), we have to manually adjust zone->nr_isolate_pageblock. [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1597150703-19003-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
On the memory onlining path, we want to start with MIGRATE_ISOLATE, to un-isolate the pages after memory onlining is complete. Let's allow passing in the migratetype. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Commit ac5d2539 ("mm: meminit: reduce number of times pageblocks are set during struct page init") moved the actual zone range check, leaving only the alignment check for pageblocks. Let's drop the stale comment and make the pageblock check easier to read. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We don't allow to offline memory with holes, all boot memory is online, and all hotplugged memory cannot have holes. We can now simplify onlining of pages. As we only allow to online/offline full sections and sections always span full MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES, we can just process MAX_ORDER - 1 pages without further special handling. The number of onlined pages simply corresponds to the number of pages we were requested to online. While at it, refine the comment regarding the callback not exposing all pages to the buddy. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Callers no longer need the number of isolated pageblocks. Let's simplify. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We make sure that we cannot have any memory holes right at the beginning of offline_pages() and we only support to online/offline full sections. Both, sections and pageblocks are a power of two in size, and sections always span full pageblocks. We can directly calculate the number of isolated pageblocks from nr_pages. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
offline_pages() is the only user. __offline_isolated_pages() never gets called with ranges that contain memory holes and we no longer care about the return value. Drop the return value handling and all pfn_valid() checks. Update the documentation. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
We make sure that we cannot have any memory holes right at the beginning of offline_pages(). We no longer need walk_system_ram_range() and can call test_pages_isolated() and __offline_isolated_pages() directly. offlined_pages always corresponds to nr_pages, so we can simplify that. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: patch conflict resolution] Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Already two people (including me) tried to offline subsections, because the function looks like it can deal with it. But we really can only online/offline full sections that are properly aligned (e.g., we can only mark full sections online/offline via SECTION_IS_ONLINE). Add a simple safety net to document the restriction now. Current users (core and powernv/memtrace) respect these restrictions. Signed-off-by:
-
David Hildenbrand authored
Patch series "mm/memory_hotplug: online_pages()/offline_pages() cleanups", v2. These are a bunch of cleanups for online_pages()/offline_pages() and related code, mostly getting rid of memory hole handling that is no longer necessary. There is only a single walk_system_ram_range() call left in offline_pages(), to make sure we don't have any memory holes. I had some of these patches lying around for a longer time but didn't have time to polish them. In addition, the last patch marks all pageblocks of memory to get onlined MIGRATE_ISOLATE, so pages that have just been exposed to the buddy cannot get allocated before onlining is complete. Once heavy lifting is done, the pageblocks are set to MIGRATE_MOVABLE, such that allocations are possible. I played with DIMMs and virtio-mem on x86-64 and didn't spot any surprises. I verified that the numer of isolated pageblocks is correctly handled when onlining/offlining. This patch (of 10): There is only a single user, offline_pages(). Let's inline, to make it look more similar to online_pages(). Signed-off-by:
-
Jann Horn authored
The comment talks about having to hold mmget() (which means mm_users), but the actual check is on mm_count (which would be mmgrab()). Given that MMU notifiers are torn down in mmput() -> __mmput() -> exit_mmap() -> mmu_notifier_release(), I believe that the comment is correct and the check should be on mm->mm_users. Fix it up accordingly. Fixes: 99cb252f ("mm/mmu_notifier: add an interval tree notifier") Signed-off-by:
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by:
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200901000143.207585-1-jannh@google.comSigned-off-by:
-
Bartosz Golaszewski authored
Memory allocated with kstrdup_const() must not be passed to regular krealloc() as it is not aware of the possibility of the chunk residing in .rodata. Since there are no potential users of krealloc_const() at the moment, let's just update the doc to make it explicit. Signed-off-by:
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miaohe Lin authored
Use helper macro abs() to simplify the "x > t || x < -t" cmp. Signed-off-by:
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Mateusz Nosek authored
Variable 'want_page_poisoning' is a switch deciding if page poisoning should be enabled. This patch changes it to be static key. Signed-off-by:
Mateusz Nosek <mateusznosek0@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Aristeu Rozanski reported that a customer test case started to report -EBUSY after the hwpoison rework patchset. There is a race window between spotting a free page and taking it off its buddy freelist, so it might be that by the time we try to take it off, the page has been already allocated. This patch tries to handle such race window by trying to handle the new type of page again if the page was allocated under us. Reported-by:
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@ruivo.org> Signed-off-by:
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922135650.1634-15-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
Naoya Horiguchi authored
Soft offlining could fail with EIO due to the race condition with hugepage migration. This issuse became visible due to the change by previous patch that makes soft offline handler take page refcount by its own. We have no way to directly pin zero refcount page, and the page considered as a zero refcount page could be allocated just after the first check. This patch adds the second check to find the race and gives us chance to handle it more reliably. Reported-by:
Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by:
-
Naoya Horiguchi authored
memory_failure() is supposed to call action_result() when it handles a memory error event, but there's one missing case. So let's add it. I find that include/ras/ras_event.h has some other MF_MSG_* undefined, so this patch also adds them. Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Currently, there is an inconsistency when calling soft-offline from different paths on a page that is already poisoned. 1) madvise: madvise_inject_error skips any poisoned page and continues the loop. If that was the only page to madvise, it returns 0. 2) /sys/devices/system/memory/: When calling soft_offline_page_store()->soft_offline_page(), we return -EBUSY in case the page is already poisoned. This is inconsistent with a) the above example and b) memory_failure, where we return 0 if the page was poisoned. Fix this by dropping the PageHWPoison() check in madvise_inject_error, and let soft_offline_page return 0 if it finds the page already poisoned. Please, note that this represents a user-api change, since now the return error when calling soft_offline_page_store()->soft_offline_page() will be different. Signed-off-by: -
Oscar Salvador authored
Merging soft_offline_huge_page and __soft_offline_page let us get rid of quite some duplicated code, and makes the code much easier to follow. Now, __soft_offline_page will handle both normal and hugetlb pages. Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
This patch changes the way we set and handle in-use poisoned pages. Until now, poisoned pages were released to the buddy allocator, trusting that the checks that take place at allocation time would act as a safe net and would skip that page. This has proved to be wrong, as we got some pfn walkers out there, like compaction, that all they care is the page to be in a buddy freelist. Although this might not be the only user, having poisoned pages in the buddy allocator seems a bad idea as we should only have free pages that are ready and meant to be used as such. Before explaining the taken approach, let us break down the kind of pages we can soft offline. - Anonymous THP (after the split, they end up being 4K pages) - Hugetlb - Order-0 pages (that can be either migrated or invalited) * Normal pages (order-0 and anon-THP) - If they are clean and unmapped page cache pages, we invalidate then by means of invalidate_inode_page(). - If they are mapped/dirty, we do the isolate-and-migrate dance. Either way, do not call put_page directly from those paths. Instead, we keep the page and send it to page_handle_poison to perform the right handling. page_handle_poison sets the HWPoison flag and does the last put_page. Down the chain, we placed a check for HWPoison page in free_pages_prepare, that just skips any poisoned page, so those pages do not end up in any pcplist/freelist. After that, we set the refcount on the page to 1 and we increment the poisoned pages counter. If we see that the check in free_pages_prepare creates trouble, we can always do what we do for free pages: - wait until the page hits buddy's freelists - take it off, and flag it The downside of the above approach is that we could race with an allocation, so by the time we want to take the page off the buddy, the page has been already allocated so we cannot soft offline it. But the user could always retry it. * Hugetlb pages - We isolate-and-migrate them After the migration has been successful, we call dissolve_free_huge_page, and we set HWPoison on the page if we succeed. Hugetlb has a slightly different handling though. While for non-hugetlb pages we cared about closing the race with an allocation, doing so for hugetlb pages requires quite some additional and intrusive code (we would need to hook in free_huge_page and some other places). So I decided to not make the code overly complicated and just fail normally if the page we allocated in the meantime. We can always build on top of this. As a bonus, because of the way we handle now in-use pages, we no longer need the put-as-isolation-migratetype dance, that was guarding for poisoned pages to end up in pcplists. Signed-off-by: -
Oscar Salvador authored
When trying to soft-offline a free page, we need to first take it off the buddy allocator. Once we know is out of reach, we can safely flag it as poisoned. take_page_off_buddy will be used to take a page meant to be poisoned off the buddy allocator. take_page_off_buddy calls break_down_buddy_pages, which splits a higher-order page in case our page belongs to one. Once the page is under our control, we call page_handle_poison to set it as poisoned and grab a refcount on it. Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Place the THP's page handling in a helper and use it from both hard and soft-offline machinery, so we get rid of some duplicated code. Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
After commit 4e41a30c ("mm: hwpoison: adjust for new thp refcounting"), put_hwpoison_page got reduced to a put_page. Let us just use put_page instead. Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Make a proper if-else condition for {hard,soft}-offline. Signed-off-by:Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oscar Salvador authored
Since get_hwpoison_page is only used in memory-failure code now, let us un-export it and make it private to that code. Signed-off-by:
-
Naoya Horiguchi authored
Another memory error injection interface debugfs:hwpoison/corrupt-pfn also takes bogus refcount for hwpoison_filter(). It's justified because this does a coarse filter, expecting that memory_failure() redoes the check for sure. Signed-off-by:
-
Naoya Horiguchi authored
hpage is never used after try_to_split_thp_page() in memory_failure(), so we don't have to update hpage. So let's not recalculate/use hpage. Suggested-by:
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@ruivo.org> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Dmitry Yakunin <zeil@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200922135650.1634-3-osalvador@suse.deSigned-off-by:
-
Naoya Horiguchi authored
Patch series "HWPOISON: soft offline rework", v7. This patchset fixes a couple of issues that the patchset Naoya sent [1] contained due to rebasing problems and a misunterdansting. Main focus of this series is to stabilize soft offline. Historically soft offlined pages have suffered from racy conditions because PageHWPoison is used to a little too aggressively, which (directly or indirectly) invades other mm code which cares little about hwpoison. This results in unexpected behavior or kernel panic, which is very far from soft offline's "do not disturb userspace or other kernel component" policy. An example of this can be found here [2]. Along with several cleanups, this code refactors and changes the way soft offline work. Main point of this change set is to contain target page "via buddy allocator" or in migrating path. For ther former we first free the target page as we do for normal pages, and once it has reached buddy and it has been taken off the freelists, we flag it as HWpoison. For the latter we never get to release the page in unmap_and_move, so the page is under our control and we can handle it in hwpoison code. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11704083/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190826104144.GA7849@linux/T/#u This patch (of 14): Drop the PageHuge check, which is dead code since memory_failure() forks into memory_failure_hugetlb() for hugetlb pages. memory_failure() and memory_failure_hugetlb() shares some functions like hwpoison_user_mappings() and identify_page_state(), so they should properly handle 4kB page, thp, and hugetlb. Signed-off-by:
-
David Howells authored
The file_ra_state being passed into page_cache_sync_readahead() was being ignored in favour of using the one embedded in the struct file. The only caller for which this makes a difference is the fsverity code if the file has been marked as POSIX_FADV_RANDOM, but it's confusing and worth fixing. Signed-off-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
-
David Howells authored
Fold ra_submit() into its last remaining user and pass the readahead_control struct to both do_page_cache_ra() and page_cache_sync_ra(). Signed-off-by:
-
