- 20 May, 2016 40 commits
-
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Later chipsets require setting this up both in FB and GR, so let's just move the allocation to FB. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Appears to more closely match what RM does. For GM20B, now also copying bit 12 from NV_PFB_MMU_CTRL as upcoming changes will require it. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
These are specified by PTOP on Maxwell GPUs. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
It appears these don't map to PBDMAs (at least on Kepler, it may or may be valid for Fermi - this hasn't been checked), but to runlists. This drops the NVKM_ENGINE_FIFO data from the entries too, as resetting all of PFIFO is *not* the way to handle such faults. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
These are now specified directly in the MC subdev. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Engine fields have been removed, as they're specified by PTOP. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
With the addition of PTOP-specified reset bits, it makes more sense to move the definitions here rather than in individual subdev implementations. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This will be later extended to handle PTOP-specified reset masks as well as the hardcoded ones. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
This will also be used to define NV_PMC_ENABLE <-> subdev mappings in an upcoming commit. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Ported from the code currently in engine/fifo/gk104.c. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Ben Skeggs authored
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Karol Herbst authored
v2: rename ina209/ina219 read function Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Karol Herbst authored
v2: add list_del call, reword error message Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Karol Herbst authored
v2: add list_del calls Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Karol Herbst authored
Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Karol Herbst authored
When we start communicating with the pmu a bit more, the current code is a real issue. I encountered a dead lock here, while testing my dynamic reclocking code Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-
Alexandre Courbot authored
In case of successful suspend, devinit will have to be run and this is the behavior currently hardcoded. However, as FD bug 94725 suggests, there might be cases where runtime suspend leaves the GPU powered, and in such cases devinit should not be run on resume. On GF100+ we have a reliable way to know whether we need to run devinit. Use it instead of blindly trusting the flag set by nvkm_devinit_fini(). The code around the NvForcePost also needs to be slightly reworked in order to keep working. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> Suggested-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Karol Herbst <nouveau@karolherbst.de> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
-