- 23 Jun, 2015 40 commits
-
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Must have missed the transition. Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
The frontbuffer code gives us accurate information about activity, let's use it. Again this should avoid unecessary updates when multiple screens are on. Also realign function paramaters, I couldn't resist that bit of OCD. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
The current code tracks business across all pipes, but we're only really interested in the one pipe DRRS is enabled on. Fairly tiny optimization, but something I noticed while reading the code. But it might matter a bit when e.g. showing a video or something only on the external screen, while the panel is kept static. Also regroup the code slightly: First compute new bitmasks, then take appropriate actions. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
The current code tracks business across all pipes, but we're only really interested in the one pipe DRRS is enabled on. Fairly tiny optimization, but something I noticed while reading the code. But it might matter a bit when e.g. showing a video or something only on the external screen, while the panel is kept static. Also regroup the code slightly: First compute new bitmasks, then take appropriate actions. Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> Cc: Sivakumar Thulasimani <sivakumar.thulasimani@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
I was momentarily confused until I've double-checked that these functions really only compute state and don't update the hardware state. They once did that, but since Ander's rework of the dpll computation flow that's no longer the case. Rename them to avoid further confusion. Note that the ilk code already follows the compute_dpll naming scheme for computing the actual register value. DDI code goes with _calc_, but that is close enough. Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Useful to figure out whether stuck bits are due to the frontbuffer tracking code as opposed to individual consumers (who have their own bitmask tracking). Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
Paulo noticed that the fbc frontbuffer tracking flush callback occasionally gets a call without any bit set. This can happen when we have to filter flush calls due to e.g. gpu rendering. Filter these out. Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Daniel Vetter authored
The current/old frontbuffer might still have gpu frontbuffer rendering pending. But once flipped it won't have the corresponding frontbuffer bits any more and hence the request retire function won't ever clear the corresponding busy bits. The async flip tracking (with the flip_prepare and flip_complete functions) already does this, but somehow I've forgotten to do this for synchronous flips. Note that we don't track outstanding rendering of the new framebuffer with busy_bits since all our plane update code waits for previous rendering to complete before displaying a new buffer. Hence a new buffer will never be busy. v2: Drop the spurious inline Ville spotted. v3: Don't touch flip_bits in the synchronsou frontbuffer_flip function, noticed by Paulo. v4: Remove one more inline that slipped through (Paulo). Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Testcase: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking/fbc-modesetfrombusy Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
Arun Siluvery authored
To initialize WA batch, at the moment we first allocate batch and then check whether we have any WA to be initialized for the given Gen; if we don't have any WA then we WARN the user, destroy the batch and return but this is causing another WARN in cleanup code complaining about sleeping in atomic context. Till we understand this better and to keep things simpler, bail out early if we don't have WA. Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
Arun Siluvery authored
Kernel 0-day framework reported warnings with WA batch patches, this patch fixes those warnings and an additional warning reported in intel_lrc.c file. Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
As there is no OLR to check, the check_olr() function is now a no-op and can be removed. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
A bunch of the low level LRC functions were passing around ringbuf and ctx pairs. In a few cases, they took the r/c pair and a request as well. This is all quite messy and unnecesary. The context_queue() call is especially bad since the fake request code got removed - it takes a request and three extra things that must be extracted from the request and then it checks them against what it finds in the request. Removing all the derivable data makes the code much simpler all round. This patch updates those functions to just take the request structure. Note that logical_ring_wait_for_space now takes a request structure but already had a local request pointer that it uses to scan for something to wait on. To avoid confusion the local variable has been renamed 'target' (it is searching for a target request to do something with) and the parameter has been called req (to guarantee anything accidentally missed gets a compiler error). v2: Updated commit message re wait_for_space (Tomas Elf review comment). For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
The LRC submission code requires a request for tracking purposes. It does not actually require that request to 'complete' it simply uses it for keeping hold of reference counts on contexts and such like. Previously, the fall back path of polling for space in the ring would start by submitting any outstanding work that was sat in the buffer. This submission was not done as part of the request that that work was owned by because that would lead to complications with the request being submitted twice. Instead, a null request structure was passed in to the submit call and a fake one was created. That fall back path has long since been obsoleted and has now been removed. Thus there is never any need to fake up a request structure. This patch removes that code. A couple of sanity check warnings are added as well, just in case. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <thomas.daniel@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
In _i915_add_request(), the request is associated with a userland client. Specifically it is linked to the 'file' structure and the current user process is recorded. One problem here is that the current user process is not necessarily the same as when the request was submitted to the driver. This is especially true when the GPU scheduler arrives and decouples driver submission from hardware submission. Note also that it is only in the case where the add request comes from an execbuff call that there is a client to associate. Any other add request call is kernel only so does not need to do it. This patch moves the client association into a separate function. This is then called from the execbuffer code path itself at a sensible time. It also removes the now redundant 'file' pointer from the add request parameter list. An extra cleanup of the client association is also added to the request clean up code for the eventuality where the request is killed after association but before being submitted (e.g. due to out of memory error somewhere). Once the submission has happened, the request is on the request list and the regular request list removal will clear the association. Note that this still needs to happen at this point in time because the request might be kept floating around much longer (due to someone holding a reference count) and the client should not be worrying about this request after it has been retired. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
The outstanding_lazy_request is no longer used anywhere in the driver. Everything that was looking at it now has a request explicitly passed in from on high. Everything that was relying upon it behind the scenes is now explicitly creating/passing/submitting its own private request. Thus the OLR can be removed. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Much of the driver has now been converted to passing requests around instead of rings/ringbufs/contexts. Thus the function for retreiving the request from a ring (i.e. the OLR) is no longer used and can be removed. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Now that the *_ring_begin() functions no longer call the request allocation code, it is finally safe for the request allocation code to call *_ring_begin(). This is important to guarantee that the space reserved for the subsequent i915_add_request() call does actually get reserved. v2: Renamed functions according to review feedback (Tomas Elf). For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, intel_logical_ring_begin() can be updated to take a request instead of a ringbuf/context pair. This also means that it no longer needs to lazily allocate a request if no-one happens to have done it earlier. Note that this change makes the execlist signature the same as the legacy version. Thus the two functions could be merged into a ring->begin() wrapper if required. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Now that everything above has been converted to use requests, intel_ring_begin() can be updated to take a request instead of a ring. This also means that it no longer needs to lazily allocate a request if no-one happens to have done it earlier. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated intel_ring_cacheline_align() to take a request instead of a ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the various ring->signal() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR to obtain the seqno value that should be used for the signal. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the ring->sync_to() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. Also updated the tracer to include the request id. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> [danvet: Rebase since I didn't merge the patch which added ->uniq.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the ring->emit_bb_start() implementation to take a request instead of a ringbuf/context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the various ring->dispatch_execbuffer() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the ring->emit_request() implementation to take a request instead of a ringbuf/request pair. Also removed its use of the OLR for obtaining the request's seqno. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the various ring->add_request() implementations to take a request instead of a ring. This removes their reliance on the OLR to obtain the seqno value that the request should be tagged with. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the various ring->emit_flush() implementations to take a request instead of a ringbuf/context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated intel_emit_post_sync_nonzero_flush(), gen7_render_ring_cs_stall_wa() and gen8_emit_pipe_control() to take requests instead of rings. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the various ring->flush() functions to take a request instead of a ring. Also updated the tracer to include the request id. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> [danvet: Rebase since I didn't merge the addition of req->uniq.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the switch_mm() code paths to take a request instead of a ring. This includes the myriad *_mm_switch functions themselves and a bunch of PDP related helper functions. v2: Rebased to newer tree. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the *_ring_flush_all_caches() functions to take requests instead of rings or ringbuf/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the *_ring_workarounds_emit() functions to take requests instead of ring/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated *_ring_invalidate_all_caches(), i915_reset_gen7_sol_offsets() and i915_emit_box() to take request structures instead of ring or ringbuf/context pairs. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated mi_set_context() to take a request structure instead of a ring and context pair. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Converted i915_gem_l3_remap() to take a request structure instead of a ring. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Now that everything above has been converted to use request structures, it is possible to update the lower level move_to_active() functions to be request based as well. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Now that all callers of i915_add_request() have a request pointer to hand, it is possible to update the add request function to take a request pointer rather than pulling it out of the OLR. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
Updated the display page flip code to do explicit request creation and submission rather than relying on the OLR and just hoping that the request actually gets submitted at some random point. The sequence is now to create a request, queue the work to the ring, assign the known request to the flip queue work item then actually submit the work and post the request. Note that every single flip function used to finish with '__intel_ring_advance(ring);'. However, immediately after they return there is now an add request call which will do the advance anyway. Thus the many duplicate advance calls have been removed. v2: Updated commit message with comment about advance removal. v3: The request can now be allocated by the _sync() code earlier on. Thus the page flip path does not necessarily need to allocate a new request, it may be able to re-use one. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
The overlay update code path to do explicit request creation and submission rather than relying on the OLR to do the right thing. For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
John Harrison authored
The plan is to pass requests around as the basic submission tracking structure rather than rings and contexts. This patch updates the i915_gem_object_sync() code path. v2: Much more complex patch to share a single request between the sync and the page flip. The _sync() function now supports lazy allocation of the request structure. That is, if one is passed in then that will be used. If one is not, then a request will be allocated and passed back out. Note that the _sync() code does not necessarily require a request. Thus one will only be created until certain situations. The reason the lazy allocation must be done within the _sync() code itself is because the decision to need one or not is not really something that code above can second guess (except in the case where one is definitely not required because no ring is passed in). The call chains above _sync() now support passing a request through which most callers passing in NULL and assuming that no request will be required (because they also pass in NULL for the ring and therefore can't be generating any ring code). The exeception is intel_crtc_page_flip() which now supports having a request returned from _sync(). If one is, then that request is shared by the page flip (if the page flip is of a type to need a request). If _sync() does not generate a request but the page flip does need one, then the page flip path will create its own request. v3: Updated comment description to be clearer about 'to_req' parameter (Tomas Elf review request). Rebased onto newer tree that significantly changed the synchronisation code. v4: Updated comments from review feedback (Tomas Elf) For: VIZ-5115 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Elf <tomas.elf@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-