- 18 Jun, 2003 40 commits
-
-
Andrew Morton authored
Before taking the highly-taken j_list_lock, take a peek to seem if this buffer is already journalled and in the appropriate state.
-
Andrew Morton authored
ext3 no longer keeps the filesystem-wide free blocks counter and free inodes counter up to date all the time in the superblock. Because that requires fs-wide locking. These counters are only needed at runtime for the Orlov allocator heuristics, and we are now using a fuzzy per-cpu coutner for that. These counters are rather unnecessary: the same info is present in the file allocation maps and inode tables, the group descriptor blocks and the bitmaps. e2fsck will be changed to downgrade the seriousness of this inconsistency. The filesystem _will_ write these numbers out in the superblock on a clean unmount, based on the sum of the free block and inode counts in the group descriptors.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> This function can leak a posix_acl on an error path.
-
Andrew Morton authored
The ioctl handler can leave a transaction open on an error path. That will wedge up the filesystem.
-
Andrew Morton authored
add a dump_stack() to a can't-happen path which happened during development.
-
Andrew Morton authored
There is a race between transaction commit's attempt to free journal_heads and journal_try_to_free_buffers' attempt. Fix that by taking a ref against the journal_head in journal_try_to_free_buffers().
-
Andrew Morton authored
ext3's fully data-journalled mode has been broken for a year. This patch fixes it up. The prepare_write/commit_write/writepage implementations have been split up. Instead of having each function handle all three journalling mode we now have three separate sets of address_space_operations. The problematic part of data=journal is MAP_SHARED writepage traffic: pages which don't have buffers. In 2.4 these were cheatingly treated as data-ordered buffers and that caused several nasty problems. Here we do it properly: writepage traffic is fully journalled. This means that the various workarounds for the 2.4 scheme can be removed, when I remember where they all are. The PG_checked flag has been borrowed: it it set in the atomic set_page_dirty a_op to tell the subsequent writepage() that this page needs to have buffers attached, dirtied and journalled. This rather defines PG_checked as "fs-private info in page->flags" and it should be renamed sometime.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Avoid holding the journal's j_list_lock while copying the buffer_head's data. We hold jbd_lock_bh_state() during the copy, which is all that is needed.
-
Andrew Morton authored
In start_this_handle() the caller does not have a handle ref pinning the transaction open, and so the call to log_start_commit() is racy because some other CPU could take the transaction into commit state independently. Fix that by holding j_state_lock (which pins j_running_transaction) across the log_start_commit() call.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Plug a conceivable race with the freeing up of trasnactions, and add some more debug checks.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Drop in a few assertions to ensure that the locking rules are being adhered to.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Add a comment describing why a race isn't there.
-
Andrew Morton authored
After ext3_writepage() has called block_write_full_page() it will walk the page's buffer ring dropping the buffer_head refcounts. It does this wrong - on the final loop it will dereference the buffer_head which it just dropped the refcount on. Poisoned oopses have been seen against bh->b_this_page. Change it to take a local copy of b_this_page prior to dropping the bh's refcount.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We need to check that buffer is still journalled _after_ taking the right locks.
-
Andrew Morton authored
There's a bug: a caller tries to journal a buffer and then decides he didn't want to after all. He calls journal_release_buffer(). But journal_release_buffer() is only allowed to give the caller a buffer credit back if it was the caller who added the buffer in the first place. journal_release_buffer() currently looks at the buffer state to work that out, but gets it wrong: if the buffer has been moved onto a different list by some other part of ext3 the credit is bogusly not returned to the caller and the fs can later go BUG due to handle credit exhaustion. The fix: Change journal_get_undo_access() to return the number of buffers which the caller actually added to the journal. (one or zero). When the caller later calls journal_release_buffer(), he passes in that count, to tell journal_release_buffer() how many credits the caller should get back. For API consistency this change should also be made to journal_get_create_access() and journal_get_write_access(). But there is no requirement for that in ext3 at this time. The remaining bug: This logic effectively gives another transaction handle a free buffer credit. These could conceivably accumulate and cause a journal overflow. This is a separate problem and needs changes to the t_outstanding_credits accounting and the logic in start_this_handle.
-
Andrew Morton authored
This filesystem-wide sleeping lock is no longer needed. Remove it.
-
Andrew Morton authored
lock_kernel() is no longer needed in JBD. Remove all the lock_kernel() calls from fs/jbd/. Here is where I get to say "ex-parrot".
-
Andrew Morton authored
Remove the remaining sleep_on() calls from JBD.
-
Andrew Morton authored
From: Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru> We're about to remove lock_journal(), and it is lock_journal which separates the running and committing transaction's revokes on the single revoke table. So implement two revoke tables and rotate them at commit time.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Impement the designed locking around journal->j_commit_request.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around journal->j_commit_sequence.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around journal->j_free. Things get a lot better here, too.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around journal->j_tail.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around journal->j_head.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around j_checkpoint_transactions. It was all pretty much there actually.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Go through all sites which use j_committing_transaction and ensure that the deisgned locking is correctly implemented there.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking around journal->j_running_transaction. A lot more of the new locking scheme falls into place.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We now start to move onto the fields of the topmost JBD data structure: the journal. The patch implements the designed locking around the j_barrier_count member. And as a part of that, a lot of the new locking scheme is implemented. Several lock_kernel()s and sleep_on()s go away.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Provide the designed locking around the transaction's t_jcb callback list. It turns out that this is wholly redundant at present.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking for t_outstanding_credits
-
Andrew Morton authored
Provide the designating locking for transaction_t.t_updates.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Now we move more into the locking of the transaction_t fields. t_nr_buffers locking is just an audit-and-commentary job.
-
Andrew Morton authored
This was a system-wide spinlock. Simple transformation: make it a filesystem-wide spinlock, in the JBD journal. That's a bit lame, and later it might be nice to make it per-transaction_t. But there are interesting ranking and ordering problems with that, especially around __journal_refile_buffer().
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designated b_tnext locking. This also covers b_tprev locking.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Go through all b_next_transaction instances, implement locking rules. (Nothing to do here - b_transaction locking covered it)
-
Andrew Morton authored
Go through all use of b_transaction and implement the rules. Fairly straightforward.
-
Andrew Morton authored
Implement the designed locking schema around the journal_head.b_committed_data field.
-
Andrew Morton authored
We now start to move across the JBD data structure's fields, from "innermost" and outwards. Start with journal_head.b_frozen_data, because the locking for this field was partially implemented in jbd-010-b_committed_data-race-fix.patch. It is protected by jbd_lock_bh_state(). We keep the lock_journal() and spin_lock(&journal_datalist_lock) calls in place. Later, spin_lock(&journal_datalist_lock) is replaced by spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock). Of course, this completion of the locking around b_frozen_data also puts a lot of the locking for other fields in place.
-
Andrew Morton authored
journal_unlock_journal_head() is misnamed: what it does is to drop a ref on the journal_head and free it if that ref fell to zero. It doesn't actually unlock anything. Rename it to journal_put_journal_head().
-
Andrew Morton authored
buffer_heads and journal_heads are joined at the hip. We need a lock to protect the joint and its refcounts. JBD is currently using a global spinlock for that. Change it to use one bit in bh->b_state.
-