- 07 Apr, 2014 17 commits
-
-
Wang Shilong authored
This patch fix a regression caused by the following patch: Btrfs: don't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock break while loop will make us call @spin_unlock() without calling @spin_lock() before, fix it. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Wang Shilong authored
Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda[8-11] -m raid5 -d raid5 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt # btrfs scrub start -BR /mnt # echo $? <--unverified errors make return value be 3 This is because we don't setup right mapping between physical and logical address for raid56, which makes checksum mismatch. But we will find everthing is fine later when rechecking using btrfs_map_block(). This patch fixed the problem by settuping right mappings and we only verify data stripes' checksums. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
To compress a small file range(<=blocksize) that is not an inline extent can not save disk space at all. skip it can save us some cpu time. This patch can also fix wrong setting nocompression flag for inode, say a case when @total_in is 4096, and then we get @total_compressed 52,because we do aligment to page cache size firstly, and then we get into conclusion @total_in=@total_compressed thus we will clear this inode's compression flag. An exception comes from inserting inline extent failure but we still have @total_compressed < @total_in,so we will still reset inode's flag, this is ok, because we don't have good compression effect. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we don't reschedule use rb_next to find the next extent state instead of a full tree search, which is more efficient and safe since we didn't release the io tree's lock. Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
There's no point building the path string in each iteration of the send_hole loop, as it produces always the same string. Signed-off-by:
-
Gui Hecheng authored
Originally following cmds will work: # btrfs fi resize -10A <mnt> # btrfs fi resize -10Gaha <mnt> Filter the arg by checking the return pointer of memparse. Signed-off-by:
Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
During an incremental send, when we finish processing an inode (corresponding to a regular file) we would assume the gap between the end of the last processed file extent and the file's size corresponded to a file hole, and therefore incorrectly send a bunch of zero bytes to overwrite that region in the file. This affects only kernel 3.14. Reproducer: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt xfs_io -f -c "falloc -k 0 268435456" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap0 xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x01 -b 9216 16190218 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x02 -b 1121 198720104 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x05 -b 9216 107887439 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 9216 225520207 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x07 -b 67584 102138300 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x08 -b 7000 94897484 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x09 -b 113664 245083212 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x10 -b 123 17937788 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x11 -b 39936 229573311 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x12 -b 67584 174792222 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x13 -b 9216 249253213 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x16 -b 67584 150046083 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x17 -b 39936 118246040 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x18 -b 67584 215965442 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x19 -b 33792 97096725 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x20 -b 125952 166300596 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x21 -b 123 1078957 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x25 -b 9216 212044492 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x26 -b 7000 265037146 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x27 -b 42757 215922685 42757" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x28 -b 7000 69865411 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x29 -b 67584 67948958 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x30 -b 39936 266967019 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x31 -b 1121 19582453 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x32 -b 17408 257710255 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x33 -b 39936 3895518 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x34 -b 125952 12045847 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x35 -b 17408 19156379 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x36 -b 39936 50160066 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x37 -b 113664 9549793 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x38 -b 105472 94391506 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x39 -b 23552 143632863 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x40 -b 39936 241283845 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x41 -b 113664 199937606 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x42 -b 67584 67380093 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x43 -b 67584 26793129 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x44 -b 39936 14421913 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x45 -b 123 253097405 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x46 -b 1121 128233424 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x47 -b 105472 91577959 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x48 -b 1121 7245381 1121" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x49 -b 113664 182414694 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x50 -b 9216 32750608 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x51 -b 67584 266546049 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x52 -b 67584 87969398 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x53 -b 9216 260848797 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x54 -b 39936 119461243 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x55 -b 7000 200178693 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x56 -b 9216 243316029 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x57 -b 7000 209658229 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x58 -b 101376 179745192 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x59 -b 9216 64012300 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x60 -b 125952 181705139 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x61 -b 23552 235737348 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x62 -b 113664 106021355 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x63 -b 67584 135753552 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x64 -b 23552 95730888 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x65 -b 11 17311415 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x66 -b 33792 120695553 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x67 -b 9216 17164631 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x68 -b 9216 136065853 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x69 -b 67584 37752198 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x70 -b 101376 189717473 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x71 -b 7000 227463698 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x72 -b 9216 12655137 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x73 -b 7000 7488866 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x74 -b 113664 87813649 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x75 -b 33792 25802183 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x76 -b 39936 93524024 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x77 -b 33792 113336388 33792" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x78 -b 105472 184955320 105472" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x79 -b 101376 225691598 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x80 -b 23552 77023155 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x81 -b 11 201888192 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x82 -b 11 115332492 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x83 -b 67584 230278015 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x84 -b 11 120589073 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x85 -b 125952 202207819 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x86 -b 113664 86672080 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x87 -b 17408 208459603 17408" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x88 -b 7000 73372211 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x89 -b 7000 42252122 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x90 -b 23552 46784881 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x91 -b 101376 63172351 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x92 -b 23552 59341931 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x93 -b 39936 239599283 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x94 -b 67584 175643105 67584" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x97 -b 23552 105534880 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x98 -b 113664 8236844 113664" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0x99 -b 125952 144489686 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa0 -b 7000 73273112 7000" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa1 -b 125952 194580243 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa2 -b 123 56296779 123" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa3 -b 11 233066845 11" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa4 -b 39936 197727090 39936" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa5 -b 101376 53579812 101376" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa6 -b 9216 85669738 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa7 -b 125952 21266322 125952" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa8 -b 23552 125726568 23552" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xa9 -b 9216 18423680 9216" /mnt/foo xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xb0 -b 1121 165901483 1121" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10 16190218 10" /mnt/foo btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 md5sum /mnt/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 79e53f1466bfc09fd82b450689e6119e too btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc mount /dev/sdc /mnt btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/1.snap btrfs receive /mnt -f /tmp/2.snap md5sum /mnt/mysnap2/foo # returns 2bb414c5155767cedccd7063e51beabd !! A testcase for xfstests follows soon too. Signed-off-by: -
Dan Carpenter authored
The error handling was copy and pasted from memdup_user(). It should be checking for NULL obviously. Fixes: abccd00f ('btrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl') Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
While running fsstress and snapshots concurrently, we will hit something like followings: Thread 1 Thread 2 |->fallocate |->write pages |->join transaction |->add ordered extent |->end transaction |->flushing data |->creating pending snapshots |->write data into src root's fallocated space After above work flows finished, we will get a state that source and snapshot root share same space, but source root have written data into fallocated space, this will make fsck fail to verify checksums for snapshot root's preallocating file extent data.Nocow writting also has this same problem. Fix this problem by syncing snapshots with nocow writting: 1.for nocow writting,if there are pending snapshots, we will fall into COW way. 2.if there are pending nocow writes, snapshots for this root will be blocked until nocow writting finish. Reported-by: -
Qu Wenruo authored
When testing fsstress with snapshot making background, some snapshot following problem. Snapshot 270: inode 323: size 0 Snapshot 271: inode 323: size 349145 |-------Hole---|---------Empty gap-------|-------Hole-----| 0 122880 172032 349145 Snapshot 272: inode 323: size 349145 |-------Hole---|------------Data---------|-------Hole-----| 0 122880 172032 349145 The fsstress operation on inode 323 is the following: write: offset 126832 len 43124 truncate: size 349145 Since the write with offset is consist of 2 operations: 1. punch hole 2. write data Hole punching is faster than data write, so hole punching in write and truncate is done first and then buffered write, so the snapshot 271 got empty gap, which will not pass btrfsck. To fix the bug, this patch will change the write sequence which will first punch a hole covering the write end if a hole is needed. Reported-by:
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Print the message only when the device is seen for the first time. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
When encountering memory pressure, testers have run into the following lockdep warning. It was caused by __link_block_group calling kobject_add with the groups_sem held. kobject_add calls kvasprintf with GFP_KERNEL, which gets us into reclaim context. The kobject doesn't actually need to be added under the lock -- it just needs to ensure that it's only added for the first block group to be linked. ========================================================= [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] 3.14.0-rc8-default #1 Not tainted --------------------------------------------------------- kswapd0/169 just changed the state of lock: (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa018baea>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x3a/0x200 [btrfs] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past: (&found->groups_sem){+++++.} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&found->groups_sem); local_irq_disable(); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(&found->groups_sem); <Interrupt> lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kswapd0/169: #0: (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff81159e8a>] shrink_slab+0x3a/0x160 #1: (&type->s_umount_key#27){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff811bac6f>] grab_super_passive+0x3f/0x90 Signed-off-by:Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just accessing root->commit_root. We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access root->commit_root under the commit root sem. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Lets try this again. We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe. This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit which is being blocked by the send. So fix this by making sure looking at the commit roots is always going to be consistent. We do this by keeping track of which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once. Then make sure we take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots. Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the backref walking code to screw up sometimes. With this patch we no longer deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases. Thanks, Reportedy-by:
Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
So I have an awful exercise script that will run snapshot, balance and send/receive in parallel. This sometimes would crash spectacularly and when it came back up the fs would be completely hosed. Turns out this is because of a bad interaction of balance and send/receive. Send will hold onto its entire path for the whole send, but its blocks could get relocated out from underneath it, and because it doesn't old tree locks theres nothing to keep this from happening. So it will go to read in a slot with an old transid, and we could have re-allocated this block for something else and it could have a completely different transid. But because we think it is invalid we clear uptodate and re-read in the block. If we do this before we actually write out the new block we could write back stale data to the fs, and boom we're screwed. Now we definitely need to fix this disconnect between send and balance, but we really really need to not allow ourselves to accidently read in stale data over new data. So make sure we check if the extent buffer is not under io before clearing uptodate, this will kick back EIO to the caller instead of reading in stale data and keep us from corrupting the fs. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We could have possibly added an extent_op to the locked_ref while we dropped locked_ref->lock, so check for this case as well and loop around. Otherwise we could lose flag updates which would lead to extent tree corruption. Thanks, cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This was done to allow NO_COW to continue to be NO_COW after relocation but it is not right. When relocating we will convert blocks to FULL_BACKREF that we relocate. We can leave some of these full backref blocks behind if they are not cow'ed out during the relocation, like if we fail the relocation with ENOSPC and then just drop the reloc tree. Then when we go to cow the block again we won't lookup the extent flags because we won't think there has been a snapshot recently which means we will do our normal ref drop thing instead of adding back a tree ref and dropping the shared ref. This will cause btrfs_free_extent to blow up because it can't find the ref we are trying to free. This was found with my ref verifying tool. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 22 Mar, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Liu Bo authored
xfstests's btrfs/035 triggers a BUG_ON, which we use to detect the split of inline extents in __btrfs_drop_extents(). For inline extents, we cannot duplicate another EXTENT_DATA item, because it breaks the rule of inline extents, that is, 'start offset' needs to be 0. We have set limitations for the source inode's compressed inline extents, because it needs to decompress and recompress. Now the destination inode's inline extents also need similar limitations. With this, xfstests btrfs/035 doesn't run into panic. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 Mar, 2014 12 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
fs/btrfs/send.c:2926: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this function Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
I added an optimization for large files where we would stop searching for backrefs once we had looked at the number of references we currently had for this extent. This works great most of the time, but for snapshots that point to this extent and has changes in the original root this assumption falls on it face. So keep track of any delayed ref mods made and add in the actual ref count as reported by the extent item and use that to limit how far down an inode we'll search for extents. Thanks, Reportedy-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed. We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current directory's rename/move operation. Simple steps to reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/Z $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33 $ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed. A more complex scenario: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2 $ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/o $ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's rename/move. Steps to reproduce the issue: $ umount /mnt $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/A $ mkdir /mnt/B $ mkdir /mnt/C $ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A $ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C $ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2 $ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2 $ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when building the path string for directory C after its references are processed. The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest inode number, that is: inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D) The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2. A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
No need to search in the send tree for the generation number of the inode, we already have it in the recorded_ref structure passed to us. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
While we update an existing ref head's extent_op, we're not holding its spinlock, so while we're updating its extent_op contents (key, flags) we can have a task running __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() that holds the ref head's lock and sets its extent_op to NULL right after the task updating the ref head just checked its extent_op was not NULL. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since most of the btrfs_workqueue is printed as pointer address, for easier analysis, add trace for btrfs_workqueue alloc/destroy. So it is possible to determine the workqueue that a given work belongs to(by comparing the wq pointer address with alloc trace event). Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <quenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When finding new extents during an autodefrag, don't do so many fs tree lookups to find an extent with a size smaller then the target treshold. Instead, after each fs tree forward search immediately unlock upper levels and process the entire leaf while holding a read lock on the leaf, since our leaf processing is very fast. This reduces lock contention, allowing for higher concurrency when other tasks want to write/update items related to other inodes in the fs tree, as we're not holding read locks on upper tree levels while processing the leaf and we do less tree searches. Test: sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=16G \ --file-test-mode=rndrw --num-threads=32 --file-block-size=32768 \ --file-rw-ratio=3 --file-io-mode=sync --max-time=1800 \ --max-requests=10000000000 [prepare|run] (fileystem mounted with -o autodefrag, averages of 5 runs) Before this change: 58.852Mb/sec throughtput, read 77.589Gb, written 25.863Gb After this change: 63.034Mb/sec throughtput, read 83.102Gb, written 27.701Gb Test machine: quad core intel i5-3570K, 32Gb of RAM, SSD. Signed-off-by: -
Guangyu Sun authored
The error message is confusing: # btrfs sub delete /mnt/mysub/ Delete subvolume '/mnt/mysub' ERROR: cannot delete '/mnt/mysub' - Directory not empty The error message does not make sense to me: It's not about deleting a directory but it's a subvolume, and it doesn't matter if the subvolume is empty or not. Maybe EPERM or is more appropriate in this case, combined with an explanatory kernel log message. (e.g. "subvolume with ID 123 cannot be deleted because it is configured as default subvolume.") Reported-by:
Koen De Wit <koen.de.wit@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Guangyu Sun <guangyu.sun@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When locking file ranges in the inode's io_tree, cache the first extent state that belongs to the target range, so that when unlocking the range we don't need to search in the io_tree again, reducing cpu time and making and therefore holding the io_tree's lock for a shorter period. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Zach found this deadlock that would happen like this btrfs_end_transaction <- reduce trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs btrfs_cow_block find_free_extent btrfs_start_transaction <- increase trans->use_count to 1 allocate chunk btrfs_end_transaction <- decrease trans->use_count to 0 btrfs_run_delayed_refs lock tree block we are cowing above ^^ We need to only decrease trans->use_count if it is above 1, otherwise leave it alone. This will make nested trans be the only ones who decrease their added ref, and will let us get rid of the trans->use_count++ hack if we have to commit the transaction. Thanks, cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by:Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 10 Mar, 2014 10 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
We didn't have a lock to protect the access to the delalloc inodes list, that is we might access a empty delalloc inodes list if someone start flushing delalloc inodes because the delalloc inodes were moved into a other list temporarily. Fix it by wrapping the access with a lock. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
When we create a snapshot, we just need wait the ordered extents in the source fs/file root, but because we use the global mutex to protect this ordered extents list of the source fs/file root to avoid accessing a empty list, if someone got the mutex to access the ordered extents list of the other fs/file root, we had to wait. This patch splits the above global mutex, now every fs/file root has its own mutex to protect its own list. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
We needn't flush all delalloc inodes when we doesn't get s_umount lock, or we would make the tasks wait for a long time. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
generic/074 in xfstests failed sometimes because of the enospc error, the reason of this problem is that we just reclaimed the space we need from the reserved space for delalloc, and then tried to reserve the space, but if some task did no-flush reservation between the above reclamation and reservation, Task1 Task2 shrink_delalloc() reclaim 1 block (The space that can be reserved now is 1 block) do no-flush reservation reserve 1 block (The space that can be reserved now is 0 block) reserving 1 block failed the reservation of Task1 failed, but in fact, there was enough space to reserve if we could reclaim more space before. Fix this problem by the aggressive reclamation of the reserved delalloc metadata space. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The reason is: - The per-cpu counter has its own lock to protect itself. - Here we needn't get a exact value. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
As the comment in the btrfs_direct_IO says, only the compressed pages need be flush again to make sure they are on the disk, but the common pages needn't, so we add a if statement to check if the inode has compressed pages or not, if no, skip the flush. And in order to prevent the write ranges from intersecting, we need wait for the running ordered extents. But the current code waits for them twice, one is done before the direct IO starts (in btrfs_wait_ordered_range()), the other is before we get the blocks, it is unnecessary. because we can do the direct IO without holding i_mutex, it means that the intersected ordered extents may happen during the direct IO, the first wait can not avoid this problem. So we use filemap_fdatawrite_range() instead of btrfs_wait_ordered_range() to remove the first wait. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
The tasks that wait for the IO_DONE flag just care about the io of the dirty pages, so it is better to wake up them immediately after all the pages are written, not the whole process of the io completes. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
btrfs_wait_ordered_roots() moves all the list entries to a new list, and then deals with them one by one. But if the other task invokes this function at that time, it would get a empty list. It makes the enospc error happens more early. Fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
If the snapshot creation happened after the nocow write but before the dirty data flush, we would fail to flush the dirty data because of no space. So we must keep track of when those nocow write operations start and when they end, if there are nocow writers, the snapshot creators must wait. In order to implement this function, I introduce btrfs_{start, end}_nocow_write(), which is similar to mnt_{want,drop}_write(). These two functions are only used for nocow file write operations. Signed-off-by:
-
