- 07 Oct, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Omar Sandoval authored
send_write()/fill_read_buf() have some logic for avoiding reading past i_size. However, everywhere that we call send_write()/send_extent_data(), we've already clamped the length down to i_size. Get rid of the i_size handling, which simplifies the next change. Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
Now that we use the same mechanism to replace all the extents in a file range with either a hole, an existing extent (when cloning) or a new extent (when using fallocate), the name of btrfs_insert_clone_extent() no longer reflects its genericity. So rename it to btrfs_insert_replace_extent(), since what it does is to either insert an existing extent or a new extent into a file range. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The function btrfs_punch_hole_range() is now used to replace all the file extents in a given file range with an extent described in the given struct btrfs_replace_extent_info argument. This extent can either be an existing extent that is being cloned or it can be a new extent (namely a prealloc extent). When that argument is NULL it only punches a hole (drops all the existing extents) in the file range. So rename the function to btrfs_replace_file_extents(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
Now that we can use btrfs_clone_extent_info to convey information for a new prealloc extent as well, and not just for existing extents that are being cloned, rename it to btrfs_replace_extent_info, which reflects the fact that this is now more generic and it is used to replace all existing extents in a file range with the extent described by the structure. Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The value of item_size of struct btrfs_clone_extent_info is always set to the size of a non-inline file extent item, and in fact the infrastructure that uses this structure (btrfs_punch_hole_range()) does not work with inline file extents at all (and it is not supposed to). So just remove that field from the structure and use directly sizeof(struct btrfs_file_extent_item) instead. Also assert that the file extent type is not inline at btrfs_insert_clone_extent(). Reviewed-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an fallocate(), specially a zero range operation, we assume that reserving 3 units of metadata space is enough, that at most we touch one leaf in subvolume/fs tree for removing existing file extent items and inserting a new file extent item. This assumption is generally true for most common use cases. However when we end up needing to remove file extent items from multiple leaves, we can end up failing with -ENOSPC and abort the current transaction, turning the filesystem to RO mode. When this happens a stack trace like the following is dumped in dmesg/syslog: [ 1500.620934] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 1500.620938] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) [ 1500.620973] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 30807 at fs/btrfs/inode.c:9724 __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs] [ 1500.620974] Modules linked in: btrfs intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common kvm_intel (...) [ 1500.621010] CPU: 2 PID: 30807 Comm: xfs_io Tainted: G W 5.9.0-rc3-btrfs-next-67 #1 [ 1500.621012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1500.621023] RIP: 0010:__btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x512/0x570 [btrfs] [ 1500.621026] Code: 8b 40 50 f0 48 (...) [ 1500.621028] RSP: 0018:ffffb05fc8803ca0 EFLAGS: 00010286 [ 1500.621030] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9608af276488 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621032] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: 00000000ffffffff [ 1500.621033] RBP: ffffb05fc8803d90 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 [ 1500.621035] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000003200000 [ 1500.621037] R13: 00000000ffffffe4 R14: ffff9608af275fe8 R15: ffff9608af275f60 [ 1500.621039] FS: 00007fb5b2368ec0(0000) GS:ffff9608b6600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 1500.621041] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 1500.621043] CR2: 00007fb5b2366fb8 CR3: 0000000202d38005 CR4: 00000000003706e0 [ 1500.621046] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621047] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 1500.621049] Call Trace: [ 1500.621076] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x10/0x20 [btrfs] [ 1500.621087] btrfs_fallocate+0xccd/0x1280 [btrfs] [ 1500.621108] vfs_fallocate+0x14d/0x290 [ 1500.621112] ksys_fallocate+0x3a/0x70 [ 1500.621117] __x64_sys_fallocate+0x1a/0x20 [ 1500.621120] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x80 [ 1500.621123] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 1500.621126] RIP: 0033:0x7fb5b248c477 [ 1500.621128] Code: 89 7c 24 08 (...) [ 1500.621130] RSP: 002b:00007ffc7bee9060 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000011d [ 1500.621132] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000002 RCX: 00007fb5b248c477 [ 1500.621134] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 1500.621136] RBP: 0000557718faafd0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 1500.621137] R10: 0000000003200000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: 0000000000000010 [ 1500.621139] R13: 0000557718faafb0 R14: 0000557718faa480 R15: 0000000000000003 [ 1500.621151] irq event stamp: 1026217 [ 1500.621154] hardirqs last enabled at (1026223): [<ffffffffba965570>] console_unlock+0x500/0x5c0 [ 1500.621156] hardirqs last disabled at (1026228): [<ffffffffba9654c7>] console_unlock+0x457/0x5c0 [ 1500.621159] softirqs last enabled at (1022486): [<ffffffffbb6003dc>] __do_softirq+0x3dc/0x606 [ 1500.621161] softirqs last disabled at (1022477): [<ffffffffbb4010b2>] asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20 [ 1500.621162] ---[ end trace 2955b08408d8b9d4 ]--- [ 1500.621167] BTRFS: error (device sdj) in __btrfs_prealloc_file_range:9724: errno=-28 No space left When we use fallocate() internally, for reserving an extent for a space cache, inode cache or relocation, we can't hit this problem since either there aren't any file extent items to remove from the subvolume tree or there is at most one. When using plain fallocate() it's very unlikely, since that would require having many file extent items representing holes for the target range and crossing multiple leafs - we attempt to increase the range (merge) of such file extent items when punching holes, so at most we end up with 2 file extent items for holes at leaf boundaries. However when using the zero range operation of fallocate() for a large range (100+ MiB for example) that's fairly easy to trigger. The following example reproducer triggers the issue: $ cat reproducer.sh #!/bin/bash umount /dev/sdj &> /dev/null mkfs.btrfs -f -n 16384 -O ^no-holes /dev/sdj > /dev/null mount /dev/sdj /mnt/sdj # Create a 100M file with many file extent items. Punch a hole every 8K # just to speedup the file creation - we could do 4K sequential writes # followed by fsync (or O_SYNC) as well, but that takes a lot of time. file_size=$((100 * 1024 * 1024)) xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xab -b 10M 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar for ((i = 0; i < $file_size; i += 8192)); do xfs_io -c "fpunch $i 4096" /mnt/sdj/foobar done # Force a transaction commit, so the zero range operation will be forced # to COW all metadata extents it need to touch. sync xfs_io -c "fzero 0 $file_size" /mnt/sdj/foobar umount /mnt/sdj $ ./reproducer.sh wrote 104857600/104857600 bytes at offset 0 100 MiB, 10 ops; 0.0669 sec (1.458 GiB/sec and 149.3117 ops/sec) fallocate: No space left on device $ dmesg <shows the same stack trace pasted before> To fix this use the existing infrastructure that hole punching and extent cloning use for replacing a file range with another extent. This deals with doing the removal of file extent items and inserting the new one using an incremental approach, reserving more space when needed and always ensuring we don't leave an implicit hole in the range in case we need to do multiple iterations and a crash happens between iterations. A test case for fstests will follow up soon. Reviewed-by: -
YueHaibing authored
It is not used since commit 0096420a ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit"). Reviewed-by:
Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by:
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The function is short and simple, we can get rid of the declaration as it's not necessary for a static function. Move it before its first caller. No functional changes. Reviewed-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
The function does not have a common exit block and returns immediatelly so there's no point having the goto. Remove the two cases. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
We can check the argument value directly, no need for the temporary variable. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
In the function btrfs_init_dev_replace_tgtdev(), the local variable devices is used only once, we can remove it. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
On a mounted sprout filesystem, all threads now are using the sprout::device_list_mutex, and this is the only code using the seed::device_list_mutex. This patch converts to use the sprouts fs_info->fs_devices->device_list_mutex. The same reasoning holds true here, that device delete is holding the sprout::device_list_mutex. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
On an fs mounted using a sprout device, the seed fs_devices are maintained in a linked list under fs_info->fs_devices. Each seeds fs_devices also has device_list_mutex initialized to protect against the potential race with delete threads. But the delete thread (at btrfs_rm_device()) is holding the fs_info::fs_devices::device_list_mutex mutex which belongs to sprout device_list_mutex instead of seed device_list_mutex. Moreover, there aren't any significient benefits in using the seed::device_list_mutex instead of sprout::device_list_mutex. So this patch converts them of using the seed::device_list_mutex to sprout::device_list_mutex. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_sysfs_add_fs_devices() is called by btrfs_sysfs_add_mounted(). btrfs_sysfs_add_mounted() assumes that btrfs_sysfs_add_fs_devices() will either add sysfs entries for all the devices or none. So this patch keeps up to its caller expecatation and cleans up the created sysfs entries if it has to fail at some device in the list. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
We don't initialize the sysfs devid kobject and device-link yet for the seed devices in an sprouted filesystem. So this patch initializes the seed device devid kobject and the device link in the sysfs. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Similar to btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir()'s refactoring, split btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() so that we don't have to use the device argument to indicate whether to free all devices or just one device. Export btrfs_sysfs_remove_device() as device operations outside of sysfs.c now calls this instead of btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir(). btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() is renamed to btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices() to suite its new role. Now, no one outside of sysfs.c calls btrfs_sysfs_remove_fs_devices() so it is redeclared s static. And the same function had to be moved before its first caller. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
When we add a device we need to add it to sysfs, so instead of using the btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir() fs_devices argument to specify whether to add a device or all of fs_devices, call the helper function directly btrfs_sysfs_add_device() and thus make it non-static. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() return value is unused declare it as void. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_sysfs_remove_devices_dir() removes device link and devid kobject (sysfs entries) for a device or all the devices in the btrfs_fs_devices. In preparation to remove these sysfs entries for the seed as well, add a btrfs_sysfs_remove_device() helper function and avoid code duplication. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir() adds device link and devid kobject (sysfs entries) for a device or all the devices in the btrfs_fs_devices. In preparation to add these sysfs entries for the seed as well, add a btrfs_sysfs_add_device() helper function and avoid code duplication. Reviewed-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
If you replace a seed device in a sprouted fs, it appears to have successfully replaced the seed device, but if you look closely, it didn't. Here is an example. $ mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda $ btrfstune -S1 /dev/sda $ mount /dev/sda /btrfs $ btrfs device add /dev/sdb /btrfs $ umount /btrfs $ btrfs device scan --forget $ mount -o device=/dev/sda /dev/sdb /btrfs $ btrfs replace start -f /dev/sda /dev/sdc /btrfs $ echo $? 0 BTRFS info (device sdb): dev_replace from /dev/sda (devid 1) to /dev/sdc started BTRFS info (device sdb): dev_replace from /dev/sda (devid 1) to /dev/sdc finished $ btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-c3666e7f9f4f Total devices 2 FS bytes used 256.00KiB devid 1 size 3.00GiB used 520.00MiB path /dev/sdc devid 2 size 3.00GiB used 896.00MiB path /dev/sdb Label: none uuid: 10bd3202-0415-43af-96a8-d5409f310a7e Total devices 1 FS bytes used 128.00KiB devid 1 size 3.00GiB used 536.00MiB path /dev/sda So as per the replace start command and kernel log replace was successful. Now let's try to clean mount. $ umount /btrfs $ btrfs device scan --forget $ mount -o device=/dev/sdc /dev/sdb /btrfs mount: /btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. [ 636.157517] BTRFS error (device sdc): failed to read chunk tree: -2 [ 636.180177] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed That's because per dev items it is still looking for the original seed device. $ btrfs inspect-internal dump-tree -d /dev/sdb item 0 key (DEV_ITEMS DEV_ITEM 1) itemoff 16185 itemsize 98 devid 1 total_bytes 3221225472 bytes_used 545259520 io_align 4096 io_width 4096 sector_size 4096 type 0 generation 6 start_offset 0 dev_group 0 seek_speed 0 bandwidth 0 uuid 59368f50-9af2-4b17-91da-8a783cc418d4 <--- seed uuid fsid 10bd3202-0415-43af-96a8-d5409f310a7e <--- seed fsid item 1 key (DEV_ITEMS DEV_ITEM 2) itemoff 16087 itemsize 98 devid 2 total_bytes 3221225472 bytes_used 939524096 io_align 4096 io_width 4096 sector_size 4096 type 0 generation 0 start_offset 0 dev_group 0 seek_speed 0 bandwidth 0 uuid 56a0a6bc-4630-4998-8daf-3c3030c4256a <- sprout uuid fsid ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-c3666e7f9f4f <- sprout fsid But the replaced target has the following uuid+fsid in its superblock which doesn't match with the expected uuid+fsid in its devitem. $ btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdc | egrep '^generation|dev_item.uuid|dev_item.fsid|devid' generation 20 dev_item.uuid 59368f50-9af2-4b17-91da-8a783cc418d4 dev_item.fsid ab2c88b7-be81-4a7e-9849-c3666e7f9f4f [match] dev_item.devid 1 So if you provide the original seed device the mount shall be successful. Which so long happening in the test case btrfs/163. $ btrfs device scan --forget $ mount -o device=/dev/sda /dev/sdb /btrfs Fix in this patch: If a seed is not sprouted then there is no replacement of it, because of its read-only filesystem with a read-only device. Similarly, in the case of a sprouted filesystem, the seed device is still read only. So, mark it as you can't replace a seed device, you can only add a new device and then delete the seed device. If replace is attempted then returns -EINVAL. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
Systems booting without the initramfs seems to scan an unusual kind of device path (/dev/root). And at a later time, the device is updated to the correct path. We generally print the process name and PID of the process scanning the device but we don't capture the same information if the device path is rescanned with a different pathname. The current message is too long, so drop the unnecessary UUID and add process name and PID. While at this also update the duplicate device warning to include the process name and PID so the messages are consistent CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89721Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I'm a actual human being so am incapable of converting u64 to s64 in my head, so add a helper to get the pretty name of a root objectid and use that helper to spit out the name for any special roots for leaked roots, so I don't have to scratch my head and figure out which root I messed up the refs for. Signed-off-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
/sys/fs/<fsid>/exclusive_operation contains the currently executing exclusive operation. Add a sysfs_notify() when operation end, so userspace can be notified of exclusive operation is finished. Reviewed-by:
Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Goldwyn Rodrigues authored
Instead of using a flag bit for exclusive operation, use a variable to store which exclusive operation is being performed. Introduce an API to start and finish an exclusive operation. This would enable another way for tools to check which operation is running on why starting an exclusive operation failed. The followup patch adds a sysfs_notify() to alert userspace when the state changes, so userspace can perform select() on it to get notified of the change. This would enable us to enqueue a command which will wait for current exclusive operation to complete before issuing the next exclusive operation. This has been done synchronously as opposed to a background process, or else error collection (if any) will become difficult. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
While running btrfs/061, btrfs/073, btrfs/078, or btrfs/178 we hit the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/100 is trying to acquire lock: ffff96ecc22ef4a0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire+0x65/0x80 slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x20/0x200 kmem_cache_alloc+0x37/0x270 alloc_inode+0x82/0xb0 iget_locked+0x10d/0x2c0 kernfs_get_inode+0x1b/0x130 kernfs_get_tree+0x136/0x240 sysfs_get_tree+0x16/0x40 vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 path_mount+0x434/0xc00 __x64_sys_mount+0xe3/0x120 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #2 (kernfs_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 kernfs_add_one+0x23/0x150 kernfs_create_link+0x63/0xa0 sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x5e/0xd0 btrfs_sysfs_add_devices_dir+0x81/0x130 btrfs_init_new_device+0x67f/0x1250 btrfs_ioctl+0x1ef/0x2e20 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #1 (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x125/0x3a0 find_free_extent+0xdf6/0x1210 btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb3/0x1b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb0/0x310 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0x4a/0x60 __btrfs_cow_block+0x11a/0x530 btrfs_cow_block+0x104/0x220 btrfs_search_slot+0x52e/0x9d0 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x64/0xb0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x90/0x4f0 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0x93/0x140 btrfs_log_inode+0x5de/0x2020 btrfs_log_inode_parent+0x429/0xc90 btrfs_log_new_name+0x95/0x9b btrfs_rename2+0xbb9/0x1800 vfs_rename+0x64f/0x9f0 do_renameat2+0x320/0x4e0 __x64_sys_rename+0x1f/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 kthread+0x138/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &delayed_node->mutex --> kernfs_mutex --> fs_reclaim Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(kernfs_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/100: #0: ffffffff8dd74700 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8dd65c50 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x115/0x290 #2: ffff96ed2ade30e0 (&type->s_umount_key#36){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1e0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 100 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x8b/0xb8 check_noncircular+0x12d/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x119c/0x1fc0 lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 __mutex_lock+0x7e/0x7e0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 ? lock_acquire+0xa7/0x3d0 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 __btrfs_release_delayed_node.part.0+0x3f/0x330 btrfs_evict_inode+0x24c/0x500 evict+0xcf/0x1f0 dispose_list+0x48/0x70 prune_icache_sb+0x44/0x50 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1e0 do_shrink_slab+0x178/0x3c0 shrink_slab+0x17c/0x290 shrink_node+0x2b2/0x6d0 balance_pgdat+0x30a/0x670 kswapd+0x213/0x4c0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x41/0x50 ? add_wait_queue_exclusive+0x70/0x70 ? balance_pgdat+0x670/0x670 kthread+0x138/0x160 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 This happens because we are holding the chunk_mutex at the time of adding in a new device. However we only need to hold the device_list_mutex, as we're going to iterate over the fs_devices devices. Move the sysfs init stuff outside of the chunk_mutex to get rid of this lockdep splat. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x: f3cd2c58: btrfs: sysfs, rename device_link add/remove functions CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4.x Reported-by: -
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
It's counterintuitive to have a function named btrfs_inode_xxx which takes a generic inode. Also move the function to btrfs_inode.h so that it has access to the definition of struct btrfs_inode. Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I've made this change separate since it requires both of the newly added NESTED flags and I didn't want to slip it into one of those changes. If we do a double split of a node we can end up doing a BTRFS_NESTED_SPLIT on level 0, which throws lockdep off because it appears as a double lock. Since we're maxed out on subclasses, use BTRFS_NESTED_NEW_ROOT if we had to do a double split. This is OK because we won't have to do a double split if we had to insert a new root, and the new root would be at a higher level anyway. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
The way we add new roots is confusing from a locking perspective for lockdep. We generally have the rule that we lock things in order from highest level to lowest, but in the case of adding a new level to the tree we actually allocate a new block for the root, which makes the locking go in reverse. A similar issue exists for snapshotting, we cow the original root for the root of a new tree, however they're at the same level. Address this by using BTRFS_NESTING_NEW_ROOT for these operations. Signed-off-by:
-
