- 15 May, 2015 27 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
these guys are always declared next to each other; might as well put the former (pointer to previous instance) into the latter and simplify the calling conventions for {set,restore}_nameidata() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
now that struct filename is stashed in nameidata we have no need to pass it in Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
fewer arguments to pass around... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
they are always called next to each other; moreover, terminate_walk() is more symmetrical that way. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a) make it reject ERR_PTR() for name b) make it putname(name) on all other failure exits c) make it return name on success again, simplifies the callers Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a) make it reject ERR_PTR() for name b) make it putname(name) upon return in all other cases. seriously simplifies the callers... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
makes for much easier life in callers Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
pass root instead; non-NULL => copy to nd.root and set LOOKUP_ROOT in flags Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Otherwise we are risking a hard error where nonlazy restart would be the right thing to do; it's a very narrow race with mount --move and most of the time it ends up being completely harmless, but it's possible to construct a case when we'll get a bogus hard error instead of falling back to non-lazy walk... For one thing, when crossing _into_ overmount of parent we need to check for mount_lock bumps when we get NULL from __lookup_mnt() as well. For another, and less exotically, we need to make sure that the data fetched in follow_up_rcu() had been consistent. ->mnt_mountpoint is pinned for as long as it is a mountpoint, but we need to check mount_lock after fetching to verify that. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
NeilBrown authored
The guidelines for adding automount support to a filesystem in filesystems/automount-support.txt is out or date. filesystems/autofs4.txt contains more current text, so replace the out-of-date content with a reference to that. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
pointless forward declarations, stale comments Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
now that we have ->root_seq, legitimize_path(&nd->root, nd->root_seq) will do just fine... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
NeilBrown authored
touch_atime is not RCU-safe, and so cannot be called on an RCU walk. However, in situations where RCU-walk makes a difference, the symlink will likely to accessed much more often than it is useful to update the atime. So split out the test of "Does the atime actually need to be updated" into atime_needs_update(), and have get_link() unlazy if it finds that it will need to do that update. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
We are almost done - primitives for leaving RCU mode are aware of nd->stack now, a new primitive for going to non-RCU mode when we have a symlink on hands added. The thing we are heavily relying upon is that *any* unlazy failure will be shortly followed by terminate_walk(), with no access to nameidata in between. So it's enough to leave the things in a state terminate_walk() would cope with. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 11 May, 2015 13 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
we'll need them for unlazy_walk() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
same as legitimize_mnt(), except that it does *not* drop and regain rcu_read_lock; return values are 0 => grabbed a reference, we are fine 1 => failed, just go away -1 => failed, go away and mntput(bastard) when outside of rcu_read_lock Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
We *can't* call that audit garbage in RCU mode - it's doing a weird mix of allocations (GFP_NOFS, immediately followed by GFP_KERNEL) and I'm not touching that... thing again. So if this security sclero^Whardening feature gets triggered when we are in RCU mode, tough - we'll fail with -ECHILD and have everything restarted in non-RCU mode. Only to hit the same test and fail, this time with EACCES and with (oh, rapture) an audit spew produced. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
very simple - just make path_put() conditional on !RCU. Note that right now it doesn't get called in RCU mode - we leave it before getting anything into stack. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
similar to kfree_put_link() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
only one instance looks at that argument at all; that sole exception wants inode rather than dentry. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
NeilBrown authored
inode_follow_link now takes an inode and rcu flag as well as the dentry. inode is used in preference to d_backing_inode(dentry), particularly in RCU-walk mode. selinux_inode_follow_link() gets dentry_has_perm() and inode_has_perm() open-coded into it so that it can call avc_has_perm_flags() in way that is safe if LOOKUP_RCU is set. Calling avc_has_perm_flags() with rcu_read_lock() held means that when avc_has_perm_noaudit calls avc_compute_av(), the attempt to rcu_read_unlock() before calling security_compute_av() will not actually drop the RCU read-lock. However as security_compute_av() is completely in a read_lock()ed region, it should be safe with the RCU read-lock held. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
NeilBrown authored
This allows MAY_NOT_BLOCK to be passed, in RCU-walk mode, through the new avc_has_perm_flags() to avc_audit() and thence the slow_avc_audit. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
no need to refetch (and once we move unlazy out of there, recheck ->d_seq). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
David Howells authored
Make use of d_backing_inode() in pathwalk to gain access to an inode or dentry that's on a lower layer. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-