- 12 Sep, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Al Viro authored
-
- 10 Sep, 2013 39 commits
-
-
Glauber Costa authored
This patch adds the missing call to list_lru_destroy (spotted by Li Zhong) and moves the deletion to after the shrinker is unregistered, as correctly spotted by Dave Signed-off-by:
Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Glauber Costa authored
We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
There are no more users of this API, so kill it dead, dead, dead and quietly bury the corpse in a shallow, unmarked grave in a dark forest deep in the hills... [glommer@openvz.org: added flowers to the grave] Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by:
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert the remaining couple of random shrinkers in the tree to the new API. Signed-off-by:
-
Peng Tao authored
remove shrinker related wrappers. Signed-off-by:
Peng Tao <tao.peng@emc.com> Signed-off-by:
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Peng Tao authored
Convert sptlrpc encode pool shrinker to use scan/count API. Signed-off-by:
-
Peng Tao authored
convert lu_object shrinker to new count/scan API. Signed-off-by:
-
Peng Tao authored
convert ldlm shrinker to new count/scan API. Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
It consists of: * returning long instead of int * separating count from scan * returning the number of freed entities in scan Signed-off-by:
Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
The main shrinker driver will keep trying for a while to free objects if the returned value from the shrink scan procedure is 0. That means "no objects now", but a retry could very well succeed. But what we should say here is a different thing: that it is impossible to shrink, and we would better bail out soon. We find this behavior more appropriate for the case where the lock cannot be taken. Specially given the hammer behavior of the i915: if another thread is already shrinking, we are likely not to be able to shrink anything anyway when we finally acquire the mutex. Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert the driver shrinkers to the new API. Most changes are compile tested only because I either don't have the hardware or it's staging stuff. FWIW, the md and android code is pretty good, but the rest of it makes me want to claw my eyes out. The amount of broken code I just encountered is mind boggling. I've added comments explaining what is broken, but I fear that some of the code would be best dealt with by being dragged behind the bike shed, burying in mud up to it's neck and then run over repeatedly with a blunt lawn mower. Special mention goes to the zcache/zcache2 drivers. They can't co-exist in the build at the same time, they are under different menu options in menuconfig, they only show up when you've got the right set of mm subsystem options configured and so even compile testing is an exercise in pulling teeth. And that doesn't even take into account the horrible, broken code... [glommer@openvz.org: fixes for i915, android lowmem, zcache, bcache] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert the filesystem shrinkers to use the new API, and standardise some of the behaviours of the shrinkers at the same time. For example, nr_to_scan means the number of objects to scan, not the number of objects to free. I refactored the CIFS idmap shrinker a little - it really needs to be broken up into a shrinker per tree and keep an item count with the tree root so that we don't need to walk the tree every time the shrinker needs to count the number of objects in the tree (i.e. all the time under memory pressure). [glommer@openvz.org: fixes for ext4, ubifs, nfs, cifs and glock. Fixes are needed mainly due to new code merged in the tree] [assorted fixes folded in] Signed-off-by:
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Acked-by:
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
The new LRU list isolation code in xfs_qm_dquot_isolate() isn't completely up to date. Firstly, it needs conversion to return enum lru_status values, not raw numbers. Secondly - most importantly - it fails to unlock the dquot and relock the LRU in the LRU_RETRY path. This leads to deadlocks in xfstests generic/232. Fix them. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrew Morton authored
fix warnings Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert the XFS dquot lru to use the list_lru construct and convert the shrinker to being node aware. [glommer@openvz.org: edited for conflicts + warning fixes] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
In converting the buffer lru lists to use the generic code, the locking for marking the buffers as on the dispose list was lost. This results in confusion in LRU buffer tracking and acocunting, resulting in reference counts being mucked up and filesystem beig unmountable. To fix this, introduce an internal buffer spinlock to protect the state field that holds the dispose list information. Because there is now locking needed around xfs_buf_lru_add/del, and they are used in exactly one place each two lines apart, get rid of the wrappers and code the logic directly in place. Further, the LRU emptying code used on unmount is less than optimal. Convert it to use a dispose list as per a normal shrinker walk, and repeat the walk that fills the dispose list until the LRU is empty. Thi avoids needing to drop and regain the LRU lock for every item being freed, and allows the same logic as the shrinker isolate call to be used. Simpler, easier to understand. Signed-off-by:
-
Andrew Morton authored
fix warnings Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert the buftarg LRU to use the new generic LRU list and take advantage of the functionality it supplies to make the buffer cache shrinker node aware. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Now that the shrinker is passing a node in the scan control structure, we can pass this to the the generic LRU list code to isolate reclaim to the lists on matching nodes. Signed-off-by:
Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> Acked-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
The list_lru infrastructure already keeps per-node LRU lists in its node-specific list_lru_node arrays and provide us with a per-node API, and the shrinkers are properly equiped with node information. This means that we can now focus our shrinking effort in a single node, but the work that is deferred from one run to another is kept global at nr_in_batch. Work can be deferred, for instance, during direct reclaim under a GFP_NOFS allocation, where situation, all the filesystem shrinkers will be prevented from running and accumulate in nr_in_batch the amount of work they should have done, but could not. This creates an impedance problem, where upon node pressure, work deferred will accumulate and end up being flushed in other nodes. The problem we describe is particularly harmful in big machines, where many nodes can accumulate at the same time, all adding to the global counter nr_in_batch. As we accumulate more and more, we start to ask for the caches to flush even bigger numbers. The result is that the caches are depleted and do not stabilize. To achieve stable steady state behavior, we need to tackle it differently. In this patch we keep the deferred count per-node, in the new array nr_deferred[] (the name is also a bit more descriptive) and will never accumulate that to other nodes. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Pass the node of the current zone being reclaimed to shrink_slab(), allowing the shrinker control nodemask to be set appropriately for node aware shrinkers. Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
The list_lru implementation has one function, list_lru_dispose_all, with only one user (the dentry code). At first, such function appears to make sense because we are really not interested in the result of isolating each dentry separately - all of them are going away anyway. However, it's implementation is buggy in the following way: When we call list_lru_dispose_all in fs/dcache.c, we scan all dentries marking them with DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST. However, this is done without the nlru->lock taken. The imediate result of that is that someone else may add or remove the dentry from the LRU at the same time. When list_lru_del happens in that scenario we will see an element that is not yet marked with DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST (even though it will be in the future) and obviously remove it from an lru where the element no longer is. Since list_lru_dispose_all will in effect count down nlru's nr_items and list_lru_del will do the same, this will lead to an imbalance. The solution for this would not be so simple: we can obviously just keep the lru_lock taken, but then we have no guarantees that we will be able to acquire the dentry lock (dentry->d_lock). To properly solve this, we need a communication mechanism between the lru and dentry code, so they can coordinate this with each other. Such mechanism already exists in the form of the list_lru_walk_cb callback. So it is possible to construct a dcache-side prune function that does the right thing only by calling list_lru_walk in a loop until no more dentries are available. With only one user, plus the fact that a sane solution for the problem would involve boucing between dcache and list_lru anyway, I see little justification to keep the special case list_lru_dispose_all in tree. Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
This patch adapts the list_lru API to accept an optional node argument, to be used by NUMA aware shrinking functions. Code that does not care about the NUMA placement of objects can still call into the very same functions as before. They will simply iterate over all nodes. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
The LRU_RETRY code assumes that the list traversal status after we have dropped and regained the list lock. Unfortunately, this is not a valid assumption, and that can lead to racing traversals isolating objects that the other traversal expects to be the next item on the list. This is causing problems with the inode cache shrinker isolation, with races resulting in an inode on a dispose list being "isolated" because a racing traversal still thinks it is on the LRU. The inode is then never reclaimed and that causes hangs if a subsequent lookup on that inode occurs. Fix it by always restarting the list walk on a LRU_RETRY return from the isolate callback. Avoid the possibility of livelocks the current code was trying to avoid by always decrementing the nr_to_walk counter on retries so that even if we keep hitting the same item on the list we'll eventually stop trying to walk and exit out of the situation causing the problem. Reported-by:
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
[glommer@openvz.org: don't reintroduce double decrement of nr_unused_dentries, adapted for new LRU return codes] Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
When removing an element from the lru, this will be done today after the lock is released. This is a clear mistake, although we are not sure if the bugs we are seeing are related to this. All list manipulations are done inside the lock, and so should this one. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
[glommer@openvz.org: adapted for new LRU return codes] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Convert superblock shrinker to use the new count/scan API, and propagate the API changes through to the filesystem callouts. The filesystem callouts already use a count/scan API, so it's just changing counters to longs to match the VM API. This requires the dentry and inode shrinker callouts to be converted to the count/scan API. This is mainly a mechanical change. [glommer@openvz.org: use mult_frac for fractional proportions, build fixes] Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
The current shrinker callout API uses an a single shrinker call for multiple functions. To determine the function, a special magical value is passed in a parameter to change the behaviour. This complicates the implementation and return value specification for the different behaviours. Separate the two different behaviours into separate operations, one to return a count of freeable objects in the cache, and another to scan a certain number of objects in the cache for freeing. In defining these new operations, ensure the return values and resultant behaviours are clearly defined and documented. Modify shrink_slab() to use the new API and implement the callouts for all the existing shrinkers. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
One of the big problems with modifying the way the dcache shrinker and LRU implementation works is that the LRU is abused in several ways. One of these is shrink_dentry_list(). Basically, we can move a dentry off the LRU onto a different list without doing any accounting changes, and then use dentry_lru_prune() to remove it from what-ever list it is now on to do the LRU accounting at that point. This makes it -really hard- to change the LRU implementation. The use of the per-sb LRU lock serialises movement of the dentries between the different lists and the removal of them, and this is the only reason that it works. If we want to break up the dentry LRU lock and lists into, say, per-node lists, we remove the only serialisation that allows this lru list/dispose list abuse to work. To make this work effectively, the dispose list has to be isolated from the LRU list - dentries have to be removed from the LRU *before* being placed on the dispose list. This means that the LRU accounting and isolation is completed before disposal is started, and that means we can change the LRU implementation freely in future. This means that dentries *must* be marked with DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST when they are placed on the dispose list so that we don't think that parent dentries found in try_prune_one_dentry() are on the LRU when the are actually on the dispose list. This would result in accounting the dentry to the LRU a second time. Hence dentry_lru_del() has to handle the DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST case Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
With the dentry LRUs being per-sb structures, there is no real need for a global dentry_lru_lock. The locking can be made more fine-grained by moving to a per-sb LRU lock, isolating the LRU operations of different filesytsems completely from each other. The need for this is independent of any performance consideration that may arise: in the interest of abstracting the lru operations away, it is mandatory that each lru works around its own lock instead of a global lock for all of them. [glommer@openvz.org: updated changelog ] Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by:
-
Dave Chinner authored
Before we split up the dcache_lru_lock, the unused dentry counter needs to be made independent of the global dcache_lru_lock. Convert it to per-cpu counters to do this. Signed-off-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
The sysctl knob sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure is used to determine which percentage of the shrinkable objects in our cache we should actively try to shrink. It works great in situations in which we have many objects (at least more than 100), because the aproximation errors will be negligible. But if this is not the case, specially when total_objects < 100, we may end up concluding that we have no objects at all (total / 100 = 0, if total < 100). This is certainly not the biggest killer in the world, but may matter in very low kernel memory situations. Signed-off-by:
Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Acked-by:
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by:
-
Glauber Costa authored
This series reworks our current object cache shrinking infrastructure in two main ways: * Noticing that a lot of users copy and paste their own version of LRU lists for objects, we put some effort in providing a generic version. It is modeled after the filesystem users: dentries, inodes, and xfs (for various tasks), but we expect that other users could benefit in the near future with little or no modification. Let us know if you have any issues. * The underlying list_lru being proposed automatically and transparently keeps the elements in per-node lists, and is able to manipulate the node lists individually. Given this infrastructure, we are able to modify the up-to-now hammer called shrink_slab to proceed with node-reclaim instead of always searching memory from all over like it has been doing. Per-node lru lists are also expected to lead to less contention in the lru locks on multi-node scans, since we are now no longer fighting for a global lock. The locks usually disappear from the profilers with this change. Although we have no official benchmarks for this version - be our guest to independently evaluate this - earlier versions of this series were performance tested (details at http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/100537) yielding no visible performance regressions while yielding a better qualitative behavior in NUMA machines. With this infrastructure in place, we can use the list_lru entry point to provide memcg isolation and per-memcg targeted reclaim. Historically, those two pieces of work have been posted together. This version presents only the infrastructure work, deferring the memcg work for a later time, so we can focus on getting this part tested. You can see more about the history of such work at http://lwn.net/Articles/552769/ Dave Chinner (18): dcache: convert dentry_stat.nr_unused to per-cpu counters dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks dcache: remove dentries from LRU before putting on dispose list mm: new shrinker API shrinker: convert superblock shrinkers to new API list: add a new LRU list type inode: convert inode lru list to generic lru list code. dcache: convert to use new lru list infrastructure list_lru: per-node list infrastructure shrinker: add node awareness fs: convert inode and dentry shrinking to be node aware xfs: convert buftarg LRU to generic code xfs: rework buffer dispose list tracking xfs: convert dquot cache lru to list_lru fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API drivers: convert shrinkers to new count/scan API shrinker: convert remaining shrinkers to count/scan API shrinker: Kill old ->shrink API. Glauber Costa (7): fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long super: fix calculation of shrinkable objects for small numbers list_lru: per-node API vmscan: per-node deferred work i915: bail out earlier when shrinker cannot acquire mutex hugepage: convert huge zero page shrinker to new shrinker API list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays This patch: There are situations in very large machines in which we can have a large quantity of dirty inodes, unused dentries, etc. This is particularly true when umounting a filesystem, where eventually since every live object will eventually be discarded. Dave Chinner reported a problem with this while experimenting with the shrinker revamp patchset. So we believe it is time for a change. This patch just moves int to longs. Machines where it matters should have a big long anyway. Signed-off-by:
-
Dave Jones authored
Signed-off-by:
Dave Jones <davej@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: -
Christoph Hellwig authored
For a long time no filesystem has been using vfs_follow_link, and as seen by recent filesystem submissions any new use is accidental as well. Remove vfs_follow_link, document the replacement in Documentation/filesystems/porting and also rename __vfs_follow_link to match its only caller better. Signed-off-by:
-
