1. 03 Nov, 2015 12 commits
  2. 22 Oct, 2015 25 commits
  3. 21 Oct, 2015 3 commits
    • Elad Raz's avatar
      Adding switchdev ageing notification on port bridged · 6ac311ae
      Elad Raz authored
      Configure ageing time to the HW for newly bridged device
      
      CC: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
      CC: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarElad Raz <eladr@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarScott Feldman <sfeldma@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6ac311ae
    • David S. Miller's avatar
      Merge branch 'tcp-rack' · eb9fae32
      David S. Miller authored
      Yuchung Cheng says:
      
      ====================
      RACK loss detection
      
      RACK (Recent ACK) loss recovery uses the notion of time instead of
      packet sequence (FACK) or counts (dupthresh).
      
      It's inspired by the FACK heuristic in tcp_mark_lost_retrans(): when a
      limited transmit (new data packet) is sacked in recovery, then any
      retransmission sent before that newly sacked packet was sent must have
      been lost, since at least one round trip time has elapsed.
      
      But that existing heuristic from tcp_mark_lost_retrans()
      has several limitations:
        1) it can't detect tail drops since it depends on limited transmit
        2) it's disabled upon reordering (assumes no reordering)
        3) it's only enabled in fast recovery but not timeout recovery
      
      RACK addresses these limitations with a core idea: an unacknowledged
      packet P1 is deemed lost if a packet P2 that was sent later is is
      s/acked, since at least one round trip has passed.
      
      Since RACK cares about the time sequence instead of the data sequence
      of packets, it can detect tail drops when a later retransmission is
      s/acked, while FACK or dupthresh can't. For reordering RACK uses a
      dynamically adjusted reordering window ("reo_wnd") to reduce false
      positives on ever (small) degree of reordering, similar to the delayed
      Early Retransmit.
      
      In the current patch set RACK is only a supplemental loss detection
      and does not trigger fast recovery. However we are developing RACK
      to replace or consolidate FACK/dupthresh, early retransmit, and
      thin-dupack. These heuristics all implicitly bear the time notion.
      For example, the delayed Early Retransmit is simply applying RACK
      to trigger the fast recovery with small inflight.
      
      RACK requires measuring the minimum RTT. Tracking a global min is less
      robust due to traffic engineering pathing changes. Therefore it uses a
      windowed filter by Kathleen Nichols. The min RTT can also be useful
      for various other purposes like congestion control or stat monitoring.
      
      This patch has been used on Google servers for well over 1 year. RACK
      has also been implemented in the QUIC protocol. We are submitting an
      IETF draft as well.
      ====================
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      eb9fae32
    • Yuchung Cheng's avatar
      tcp: use RACK to detect losses · 4f41b1c5
      Yuchung Cheng authored
      This patch implements the second half of RACK that uses the the most
      recent transmit time among all delivered packets to detect losses.
      
      tcp_rack_mark_lost() is called upon receiving a dubious ACK.
      It then checks if an not-yet-sacked packet was sent at least
      "reo_wnd" prior to the sent time of the most recently delivered.
      If so the packet is deemed lost.
      
      The "reo_wnd" reordering window starts with 1msec for fast loss
      detection and changes to min-RTT/4 when reordering is observed.
      We found 1msec accommodates well on tiny degree of reordering
      (<3 pkts) on faster links. We use min-RTT instead of SRTT because
      reordering is more of a path property but SRTT can be inflated by
      self-inflicated congestion. The factor of 4 is borrowed from the
      delayed early retransmit and seems to work reasonably well.
      
      Since RACK is still experimental, it is now used as a supplemental
      loss detection on top of existing algorithms. It is only effective
      after the fast recovery starts or after the timeout occurs. The
      fast recovery is still triggered by FACK and/or dupack threshold
      instead of RACK.
      
      We introduce a new sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_recovery for future
      experiments of loss recoveries. For now RACK can be disabled by
      setting it to 0.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4f41b1c5