Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 06 Jul, 2018 12 commits
  3. 05 Jul, 2018 8 commits
  5. 04 Jul, 2018 4 commits
  7. 03 Jul, 2018 2 commits
  9. 02 Jul, 2018 6 commits
  11. 29 Jun, 2018 5 commits
  13. 28 Jun, 2018 3 commits
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/execlists: Direct submission of new requests (avoid tasklet/ksoftirqd) · 9512f985
      Chris Wilson authored 
      Back in commit 27af5eea ("drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a
bottom half"), we came to the conclusion that running our CSB processing
and ELSP submission from inside the irq handler was a bad idea. A really
bad idea as we could impose nearly 1s latency on other users of the
system, on average! Deferring our work to a tasklet allowed us to do the
processing with irqs enabled, reducing the impact to an average of about
50us.

We have since eradicated the use of forcewaked mmio from inside the CSB
processing and ELSP submission, bringing the impact down to around 5us
(on Kabylake); an order of magnitude better than our measurements 2
years ago on Broadwell and only about 2x worse on average than the
gem_syslatency on an unladen system.

In this iteration of the tasklet-vs-direct submission debate, we seek a
compromise where by we submit new requests immediately to the HW but
defer processing the CS interrupt onto a tasklet. We gain the advantage
of low-latency and ksoftirqd avoidance when waking up the HW, while
avoiding the system-wide starvation of our CS irq-storms.

Comparing the impact on the maximum latency observed (that is the time
stolen from an RT process) over a 120s interval, repeated several times
(using gem_syslatency, similar to RT's cyclictest) while the system is
fully laden with i915 nops, we see that direct submission an actually
improve the worse case.

Maximum latency in microseconds of a third party RT thread
(gem_syslatency -t 120 -f 2)
  x Always using tasklets (a couple of >1000us outliers removed)
  + Only using tasklets from CS irq, direct submission of requests
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|          +                                                             |
|          +                                                             |
|          +                                                             |
|          +       +                                                     |
|          + +     +                                                     |
|       +  + +     +  x     x     x                                      |
|      +++ + +     +  x  x  x  x  x  x                                   |
|      +++ + ++  + +  *x x  x  x  x  x                                   |
|      +++ + ++  + *  *x x  *  x  x  x                                   |
|    + +++ + ++  * * +*xxx  *  x  x  xx                                  |
|    * +++ + ++++* *x+**xx+ *  x  x xxxx x                               |
|   **x++++*++**+*x*x****x+ * +x xx xxxx x          x                    |
|x* ******+***************++*+***xxxxxx* xx*x     xxx +                x+|
|             |__________MA___________|                                  |
|      |______M__A________|                                              |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    N           Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
x 118            91           186           124     125.28814     16.279137
+ 120            92           187           109     112.00833     13.458617
Difference at 95.0% confidence
	-13.2798 +/- 3.79219
	-10.5994% +/- 3.02677%
	(Student's t, pooled s = 14.9237)

However the mean latency is adversely affected:

Mean latency in microseconds of a third party RT thread
(gem_syslatency -t 120 -f 1)
  x Always using tasklets
  + Only using tasklets from CS irq, direct submission of requests
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|           xxxxxx                                        +   ++         |
|           xxxxxx                                        +   ++         |
|           xxxxxx                                      + +++ ++         |
|           xxxxxxx                                     +++++ ++         |
|           xxxxxxx                                     +++++ ++         |
|           xxxxxxx                                     +++++ +++        |
|           xxxxxxx                                   + ++++++++++       |
|           xxxxxxxx                                 ++ ++++++++++       |
|           xxxxxxxx                                 ++ ++++++++++       |
|          xxxxxxxxxx                                +++++++++++++++     |
|         xxxxxxxxxxx    x                           +++++++++++++++     |
|x       xxxxxxxxxxxxx   x           +            + ++++++++++++++++++  +|
|           |__A__|                                                      |
|                                                      |____A___|        |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    N           Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
x 120         3.506         3.727         3.631     3.6321417    0.02773109
+ 120         3.834         4.149         4.039     4.0375167   0.041221676
Difference at 95.0% confidence
	0.405375 +/- 0.00888913
	11.1608% +/- 0.244735%
	(Student's t, pooled s = 0.03513)

However, since the mean latency corresponds to the amount of irqsoff
processing we have to do for a CS interrupt, we only need to speed that
up to benefit not just system latency but our own throughput.

v2: Remember to defer submissions when under reset.
v4: Only use direct submission for new requests
v5: Be aware that with mixing direct tasklet evaluation and deferred
tasklets, we may end up idling before running the deferred tasklet.
v6: Remove the redudant likely() from tasklet_is_enabled(), restrict the
annotation to reset_in_progress().
v7: Take the full timeline.lock when enabling perf_pmu stats as the
tasklet is no longer a valid guard. A consequence is that the stats are
now only valid for engines also using the timeline.lock to process
state.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_latency/*rthog*
References: 27af5eea ("drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a bottom half")
Suggested-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180628201211.13837-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      9512f985
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/execlists: Trust the CSB · fd8526e5
      Chris Wilson authored 
      Now that we use the CSB stored in the CPU friendly HWSP, we do not need
to track interrupts for when the mmio CSB registers are valid and can
just check where we read up to last from the cached HWSP. This means we
can forgo the atomic bit tracking from interrupt, and in the next patch
it means we can check the CSB at any time.

v2: Change the splitting inside reset_prepare, we only want to lose
testing the interrupt in this patch, the next patch requires the change
in locking
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180628201211.13837-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      fd8526e5
    • Chris Wilson's avatar
      drm/i915/execlists: Stop storing the CSB read pointer in the mmio register · 3800cd19
      Chris Wilson authored 
      As we now never read back our current head position from the CSB
pointers register, and the HW itself doesn't use it to prevent
overwriting unread CSB entries, we do not need to keep updating the
register. As it turns out this register is not listed as being shadowed,
and so requires forcewake -- but we haven't been taking forcewake around
it so the writes has probably been regularly dropped. Fortuitously, we
only read the value after a reset where it did not matter, and zero was
the right answer (well, close enough).

Mika pointed out that this was how we used to do it (accidentally!)
before he fixed it in commit cc53699b ("drm/i915: Use masked write
for Context Status Buffer Pointer").

References: cc53699b ("drm/i915: Use masked write for Context Status Buffer Pointer")
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180628201211.13837-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      3800cd19
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7