• unknown's avatar
    Fix for BUG#11185. · 1a8c334b
    unknown authored
      
      The source of the problem is in Field_longlong::cmp. If 'this' is
      an unsigned number, the method casts both the current value, and
      the constant that we compare with to an unsigned number. As a
      result if the constant we compare with is a negative number, it
      wraps to some unsigned number, and the comparison is incorrect.
      
      When the optimizer chooses the "range" access method, this problem
      causes handler::read_range_next to reject the current key when the
      upper bound key is a negative number because handler::compare_key
      incorrectly considers the positive and negative keys to be equal.
      
      The current patch does not correct the source of the problem in
      Field_longlong::cmp because it is not easy to propagate sign
      information about the constant at query execution time. Instead
      the patch changes the range optimizer so that it never compares
      unsiged fields with negative constants. As an added benefit,
      queries that do such comparisons will execute faster because
      the range optimizer replaces conditions like:
      (a) (unsigned_int [< | <=] negative_constant) == FALSE
      (b) (unsigned_int [> | >=] negative_constant) == TRUE
      with the corresponding constants.
      In some cases this may even result in constant time execution.
    
    
    mysql-test/r/range.result:
      - Added test for BUG#11185
      - Added missing test from 4.1. This test also tests the fix for BUG#11185.
    mysql-test/t/range.test:
      - Added test for BUG#11185
      - Added missing test from 4.1. This test also tests the fix for BUG#11185.
    sql/opt_range.cc:
      Added a new optimization to the range optimizer where we detect that
      an UNSIGNED field is compared with a negative constant. Depending on
      the comparison operator, we know directly that the result of the
      comparison is either TRUE or FALSE for all input values, and we need
      not check each value.
          
      This optimization is also necessary so that the index range access
      method produces correct results when comparing unsigned fields with
      negative constants.
    1a8c334b
range.result 26.9 KB