write_record() when performing REPLACE has an optimization:
- if the unique violation happened in the last unique key, then do UPDATE
- otherwise, do DELETE+INSERT

This patch changes the way of detecting if this optimization
can be applied if the table has long (hash based) unique
(i.e. UNIQUE..USING HASH) constraints.

Problem:

The old condition did not take into account that
TABLE_SHARE and TABLE see long uniques differently:
- TABLE_SHARE sees as HA_KEY_ALG_LONG_HASH and HA_NOSAME
- TABLE sees as usual non-unique indexes
So the old condition could erroneously decide that the UPDATE optimization
is possible when there are still some unique hash constraints in the table.

Fix:

- If the current key is a long unique, it now works as follows:

  UPDATE can be done if the current long unique is the last
  long unique, and there are no in-engine (normal) uniques.

- For in-engine uniques nothing changes, it still works as before:

  If the current key is an in-engine (normal) unique:
  UPDATE can be done if it is the last normal unique.