Commit 3b658d07 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Tru64 cxx compiler fix

    cxx does not include -I/ust/include.dtk as it should
    removed dependency on ndb_types


configure.in:
  Tru64 cxx compiler fix
  cxx does not include -I/ust/include.dtk as it should
ndb/include/ndbapi/ndbapi_limits.h:
  removed dependency on ndb_types
sql/ha_ndbcluster.h:
  removed dependency on ndb_types
parent 8ee12417
...@@ -1144,7 +1144,8 @@ dnl Is this the right match for DEC OSF on alpha? ...@@ -1144,7 +1144,8 @@ dnl Is this the right match for DEC OSF on alpha?
# gethostbyname_r is deprecated and doesn't work ok on OSF1 # gethostbyname_r is deprecated and doesn't work ok on OSF1
CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DUNDEF_HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R" CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -DUNDEF_HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R"
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -DUNDEF_HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R" CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -DUNDEF_HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R"
ndb_cxxflags_fix="$ndb_cxxflags_fix -I/usr/include.dtk" # fix to handle include of <stdint.h> correctly on OSF1 with cxx compiler
CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -I/usr/include/cxx -I/usr/include/cxx_cname -I/usr/include.dtk"
;; ;;
*netware*) *netware*)
# No need for curses library so set it to null # No need for curses library so set it to null
......
...@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ ...@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@
#define NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE_IN_WORDS 1023 #define NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE_IN_WORDS 1023
#define NDB_MAX_KEYSIZE_IN_WORDS 1023 #define NDB_MAX_KEYSIZE_IN_WORDS 1023
#define NDB_MAX_KEY_SIZE NDB_MAX_KEYSIZE_IN_WORDS*sizeof(Uint32) #define NDB_MAX_KEY_SIZE (NDB_MAX_KEYSIZE_IN_WORDS*4)
#define NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE_IN_WORDS*sizeof(uint32) #define NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE (NDB_MAX_TUPLE_SIZE_IN_WORDS*4)
#define NDB_MAX_ACTIVE_EVENTS 100 #define NDB_MAX_ACTIVE_EVENTS 100
#endif #endif
...@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ ...@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#endif #endif
#include <ndbapi_limits.h> #include <ndbapi_limits.h>
#include <ndb_types.h>
class Ndb; // Forward declaration class Ndb; // Forward declaration
class NdbOperation; // Forward declaration class NdbOperation; // Forward declaration
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment